Publication: Management of Earthquake Risk in the European Union
Loading...
Published
2025-09-29
ISSN
Date
2025-10-09
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Several countries in the European Union (EU) face significant earthquake risk, primarily due to seismic hazard levels and aging infrastructure. Unlike many other natural hazards, earthquakes occur without warning, limiting the ability to evacuate people and protect lives. At the same time, decades can pass between large earthquakes, leading to a decline in public awareness and policy attention to the risk. When large earthquakes do occur, they can cause significant damage and loss, often requiring several decades for the affected areas to recover. Between 2000 and 2020, earthquakes caused more than Euro 60 billion in direct damage to EU Member States, confirming their status as one of the costliest natural hazards in the region. All these factors make long-term planning, risk reduction, prevention, and preparedness efforts essential to reducing the impacts of earthquakes. This report summarizes the results of a rapid review of earthquake risk and risk management capacity in the EU, highlighting potential risk management priorities to inform policy dialogue and future research. The review considers capacity across multiple dimensions, including governance, understanding of earthquake risk, risk reduction and mitigation, early warning and public awareness, preparedness and emergency response, recovery and post-disaster financing, and cross-cutting topics such as social resilience and the role of the private sector. Each chapter reviews the current arrangements, key challenges, and opportunities across the EU for each of these dimensions, drawing on available information. This review aims to provide an EU-wide perspective on earthquake risk management, using EU Member States as examples but not providing an in-depth analysis of each EU Member State.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. Management of Earthquake Risk in the European Union. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43825 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Citations
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication GDLN Seminar on Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in East Asia and the Pacific : Volume 1 . Post‐disaster recovery procedures of the Great Hanshin (Kobe earthquake) earthquake and the Great Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake(Washington, DC, 2008-12)In the GLDN seminar, the recovery procedures in the aftermath of the Kobe earthquake and the Asian tsunami were discussed. This introduction to Catastrophe Risk Financing Frameworks seminar provided participants with an understanding of catastrophe risk financing frameworks. In addition, it informed participants of new product lines in risk mitigation and risk finance and transfer and shared experiences of Bank-financed projects, including Turkey's Catastrophic Insurance Pool.Publication Cyprus - Management of Earthquake Risk(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-09-29)The Republic of Cyprus (hereafter referred to as ‘Cyprus’) faces various natural hazards, including earthquakes. According to the National Risk Assessment (NRA) for the Republic of Cyprus, earthquakes pose the second greatest risk of high impact, following wildfires. Based on national and European-wide seismic hazard assessments, Cyprus is classified as a high-hazard seismic area, with the highest risk concentrated in the southern part of the island. Since it has been many decades since the last deadly large earthquake (the 1953 Mw 6.3 Paphos earthquake), public awareness of the earthquake risk and its consequences is relatively limited. Thus, risk reduction, prevention, and preparedness efforts are essential to mitigating the impacts of future earthquakes. This report summarizes the results of a rapid review of earthquake risk and management capacity in Cyprus, highlighting potential risk management actions and investment opportunities to inform policy dialogue and future research. The review considers capacity across multiple dimensions, including governance, understanding earthquake risk, risk reduction and mitigation, early warning and public awareness, preparedness and emergency response, recovery and post-disaster financing, and cross-cutting topics such as social resilience and the role of the private sector. Drawing on available information, each chapter reviews the general context, current arrangements, and key challenges and opportunities to enhance earthquake resilience in Cyprus.Publication Earthquake Risk Insurance(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-09)The March 2011 earthquake that hit east Japan was the fourth-largest ever recorded. It was not only a human tragedy but an economic shock with losses estimated in excess of 16,900 billion Chinese yuan, making it the costliest disaster in history. Despite this, the Japanese insurance industry is expected to emerge without significant financial impairment, thanks to a well-developed residential earthquake risk insurance dual program (with private nonlife insurers and cooperative mutual insurers) based on conservative control of insurers' liabilities (through insurance policy structures and reinsurance). Meanwhile, more than half of Japanese homeowners are still uninsured, creating a significant fiscal burden for the government. This report gives findings; lessons; and recommendations for developing countries.Publication Romania - Management of Earthquake Risk(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-09-29)Romania is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the European Union (EU). The national risk assessment (NRA, RO-RISK) identifies earthquakes as the country's top hazard, potentially affecting over half of the country. Romania’s capital city, Bucharest, with its dense population and aging building stock, is among Europe's most vulnerable urban areas. With estimated annual average losses of Euro 512 million and potential large-scale damage and long-term impact on society, Romania’s earthquake risk underscores the urgent need to assess evolving risk trends and strengthen national earthquake response capacity. Romania has made several important efforts in seismic risk management. These include developing a national strategic framework in line with international standards, reinforcing the legislative framework, updating building codes, and streamlining the institutional set-up to foster greater cooperation among key stakeholders. Building on progress and lessons learned, Romania is intensifying efforts to enhance the resilience of its built environment and communities to earthquakes while strengthening response. To further strengthen seismic risk management in Romania, opportunities exist in enhancing legal frameworks, improving coordination, updating risk assessments, strengthening public administration, developing disaster risk financing strategies, and creating a multi-hazard recovery framework integrating the ‘build back better’ (BBB) principle. Strengthening cross-sectoral coordination and accountability through clear mandates, guidance, and performance monitoring can help embed risk reduction more effectively into all relevant sectors. To address all types of infrastructure, sectoral ministries must develop specific strategies, programs, or action plans, including strategic or nationally significant infrastructures. This report offers a rapid review of earthquake risks and risk management capacity, investment needs, and recommendations to inform policy dialogue and future research. Capacity considers earthquake risk governance, risk understanding, risk reduction and mitigation, preparedness and early warning, readiness and response, recovery and post-disaster financing, and cross-cutting topics such as social resilience and the private sector. Each section reviews the current arrangements, key challenges, and opportunities for improvements relevant to Romania. The findings aim to inform national and EU decision-making and contribute to ongoing policy and investment dialogue as well as future research.Publication Natural Disaster Risk Management in the Philippines : Enhancing Poverty Alleviation Through Disaster Reduction(Washington, DC, 2005-10)The Philippines by virtue of its geographic circumstances is highly prone to natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tropical cyclones and floods, making it one of the most disaster prone countries in the world. This report seeks to document the impacts of natural disasters on the social and economic development of the Philippines; assess the country's current capacity to reduce and manage disaster risk; and identify options for more effective management of that risk. The Philippine institutional arrangements and disaster management systems tend to rely on a response, or reactive approach, in contrast to a more effective proactive approach, in which disasters are avoided, by appropriate land-use planning, construction and other pre-event measures which avoid the creation of disaster-prone conditions. To evolve to a more proactive role, it is important that a national framework for comprehensive disaster risk management be prepared and implemented. The framework should incorporate the essential steps of integrated risk management, which include risk identification, risk reduction, and risk sharing/financing. The study identified some specific areas under these key themes that would need to be addressed to improve the current system, discussed through the study. The study also found that currently, the Government and individual households bear the majority of costs caused by natural disasters. More effective options for financing disaster risk, and relieving the burden of disasters from the public sector should be explored, including the idea of a catastrophe insurance pool, and/or contingent credit facilities. Also found was that, despite the high hazard risk in the Philippines, the insurance coverage for residential dwellings' catastrophes is almost non-existent. It is stipulated the Bank should examine the ongoing portfolio to identify how its projects can support the goal of disaster risk reduction. In addition, the Bank should consider more direct support to the development of an integrated disaster management risk approach, through the provision of technical assistance and lending.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.