Publication: Georgia : Winds of Optimism
Loading...
Date
2014-09
ISSN
Published
2014-09
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
The signing of the Association Agreement with the European Union in June 2014 and the coming into effect of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area in September are landmark achievements for Georgia. The Association Agreement (AA) is focused on improvements in the areas of democracy and the rule of law, human rights, good governance, and economic development. The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) is likely to enhance Georgia's trade prospects and boost economic growth by enhancing the country’s export potential, especially to developed markets. This will be facilitated through improvements in quality standards and by bringing Georgia’s legislation closer to that of the European Union (EU). The DCFTA will also remove the existing barriers on the trade of goods and services with the EU. While Georgia can now export duty-free to the EU, Georgian products will have to meet certain EU requirements not only when exported but also when being consumed within the country. This marks the beginning of a long process to improve sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards, intellectual property rights protection, competition, technical regulations on industrial products, and customs and trade facilitation and this process will involve short- to medium-term costs.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank Group. 2014. Georgia : Winds of Optimism. Georgia economic report;no. 6. © http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20671 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Mongolia Economic Update, December 2014(World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2014-12)In 2014, economic growth slowed as it began to adjust to unsustainable economic imbalances. Real GDP growth softened to 7 percent in the first 9 months, from 12.8 percent in the previous year. Despite strong mining production growth of 26 percent, the growth of the non-mining sector of the economy dropped to 2 percent in the third quarter from 17.4 percent a year ago. Investment sharply fell amidst declining FDI and weakening business prospects. Consumption remains relatively strong but is also gradually softening. The growth effect from stimulus measures of the last year is also wearing off in 2014 as large liquidity support from the central bank cannot be sustained in the wake of high inflation and external vulnerabilities. The current account deficit is narrowing significantly to around 11 percent of GDP from almost 30 percent in the previous three years, due to import contraction over 16 percent and stronger copper exports. However, a significant external financing gap continues amidst declining foreign investment, reducing internal reserves to less than three months import cover. Inflation remains in double digits after a strong credit boom in 2014 and continuous currency depreciation. Economic growth is likely to continue to soften in 2015 as the economy remains under pressure from the external imbalance and high inflation. To help achieve the goal of the new Solutions-oriented Government to overcome economic challenges and build a sound economic management system, the following policy actions are recommended to be considered in the economic policy framework: (1) Consolidate the off-budget spending made through the DBM into the budget; (2) prepare a credible and realistic fiscal consolidation plan to reduce the deficit; (3) monetary policy should be tightened; (4) further quasi-fiscal activities need to be avoided; and (5) the exchange rate should be left flexible.Publication Lebanon Economic Monitor, Spring 2013(Washington, DC, 2013-04)The Lebanon Economic Monitor provides an update on key economic developments and policies over the past six months. It also presents findings from recent World Bank work on Lebanon. The political standoff combined with an escalating Syrian conflict hampered growth in 2012, and is projected to continue doing so through the first half of 2013. Economic growth in 2012 is estimated to have decelerated to 1.4 percent due to a weak second half of 2012 following a downturn in the security situation. The major fiscal expansion that took place in 2012 is creating fiscal challenges for 2013, particularly in the context of a promised increase in public salaries. The fiscal expansion, measured by the change in the central government s primary fiscal balance, reached a staggering 4.6 percentage points of GDP in 2012. The overall fiscal deficit reached 9.4 percent of GDP in 2012. Inflationary pressures rose despite tepid economic activity. Headline inflation accelerated notably in the second half of 2012. Core inflation has also been on an upward trend, reaching 5.3 percent by end-2012. Domestically, inflationary pressures can primarily be attributed to (i) increases in disposable income in early 2012 due to the increase in the minimum wage and public sector salaries cost of living adjustment; and (ii) a cumulative output gap that remains positive following above-potential growth in 2007-2010. The conflict in Syria, a country that is closely linked, both through historical, social and economic ties to Lebanon has created a humanitarian crisis of enormous scale. While Lebanon is to be commended for its openness to Syrian refugees, the conflict is severely and negatively impacting the Lebanese economy. The largest impact arises through the insecurity and uncertainty spillovers and touches at the heart of Lebanon s societal fabric.Publication Russia Economic Report, No. 32, September 2014 : Policy Uncertainty Clouds Medium-Term Prospects(Washington, DC, 2014-09)Russia's economy is stagnating. Seasonally adjusted growth for the first two quarters of 2014 was near zero. Consumer and business sentiments were already weak in 2013 due to lingering structural problems and contributed to the wait-and-see attitudes of households and companies. Heightened market volatility and policy uncertainty due to geopolitical tensions during the first half of this year exacerbated this confidence crisis. The Russian economy needed to internalize several rounds of sanctions, countersanctions and measures to stabilize the economy; this environment of higher risk lowered domestic demand. While the macroeconomic stabilization measures were timely and successful, medium term policy objectives are still being defined. This continued policy uncertainty about the economic course of the country is casting a shadow on Russia's medium-term prospects. Prospects for further poverty reduction and shared prosperity are limited. In the past, rising wages and pension transfers allowed Russia to reduce poverty significantly and to expand the ranks of the middle-class. Unless structural reforms to expand the economy s potential are pursued, low investment makes it less likely that plentiful well-paying jobs will be created. High inflation, moreover, will slow real income growth and hurt consumption growth, dimming the likelihood for further poverty reduction and limiting the ability of the bottom 40 percent of the population to share in prosperity.Publication Georgia : Adjusting in the Face of Uncertainty(Washington, DC, 2014-03-01)Economic growth picked up in the final quarter of 2013 as policy uncertainty was reduced, confidence strengthened, and budget execution substantially increased. Surge in spending in the last quarter of the year partially offset sluggish outlays earlier to leave the fiscal deficit for 2013 as a whole at 2.6 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), a marginal improvement from 2012. There was a substantial increase in spending in the fourth quarter, although annual expenditures continued to be 8 percent below the budgeted amount. Revenue collections were also low due to subdued economic activity. Although the fiscal deficit is expected to increase to 3.8 percent of GDP in 2014, it should decline thereafter given the government's commitment to fiscal consolidation. The current account deficit narrowed in 2013 as exports picked up, especially to Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), while imports languished due to weak investment and consumption. The unemployment problem persisted with a net decline in business sector jobs by 5 percent during the first three quarters of 2013. In this context, the report presents political developments; recent economic developments; and economic and structural policies.Publication South East Europe Regular Economic Report No. 6 : Brittle recovery(Washington, DC, 2014-05)This report covers economic developments, prospects, and policies in six South Eastern European countries (SEE6): Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, FYR Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia. South East Europe (SEE6)'s economy recovered from the 2012 recession, growing by 2.2 percent on average in 2013. Each of the SEE6 countries marked positive growth rates in 2013, with growth at or exceeding 3 percent in Kosovo, FYR Macedonia and Montenegro. External demand for SEE6 exports, especially by the European Union (EU), was the key driver of the recovery. On the production side, SEE6 drivers of growth were mixed, but in all countries a good agricultural year supported economic activity. An export-led recovery combined with depressed domestic demand resulted in a significant narrowing of current account imbalances in all SEE6 countries. Foreign direct investment (FDI) and portfolio investment financed most of the current account deficits in SEE6. Overall, SEE6 countries are having limited success in translating the economic recovery into job creation. SEE6 countries reduced their fiscal deficits to 3.8 percent of GDP in 2013 from 4.3 percent of GDP in 2012. The pace of fiscal adjustment and still nascent economic growth were insufficient to reverse public debt dynamics in SEE6. In a low-inflation environment, SEE6 central banks moderately loosened monetary policy. The financial sector remained broadly stable, albeit fragile, in the course of 2013. The SEE region is projected to grow at 1.9 percent in 2014 and 2.6 percent in 2015 on the back of external demand. The positive growth since mid-2013 and the still accommodative monetary conditions of the Euro Area are likely to continue help SEE6 exports to grow, despite notable risks related to the outlook for the Euro Area (related to the slow reform implementation and prolonged period of low inflation or risk of deflation).
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016-10-02)Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016 is the first of an annual flagship report that will inform a global audience comprising development practitioners, policy makers, researchers, advocates, and citizens in general with the latest and most accurate estimates on trends in global poverty and shared prosperity. This edition will also document trends in inequality and identify recent country experiences that have been successful in reducing inequalities, provide key lessons from those experiences, and synthesize the rigorous evidence on public policies that can shift inequality in a way that bolsters poverty reduction and shared prosperity in a sustainable manner. Specifically, the report will address the following questions: • What is the latest evidence on the levels and evolution of extreme poverty and shared prosperity? • Which countries and regions have been more successful in terms of progress toward the twin goals and which are lagging behind? • What does the global context of lower economic growth mean for achieving the twin goals? • How can inequality reduction contribute to achieving the twin goals? • What does the evidence show concerning global and between- and within-country inequality trends? • Which interventions and countries have used the most innovative approaches to achieving the twin goals through reductions in inequality? The report will make four main contributions. First, it will present the most recent numbers on poverty, shared prosperity, and inequality. Second, it will stress the importance of inequality reduction in ending poverty and boosting shared prosperity by 2030 in a context of weaker growth. Third, it will highlight the diversity of within-country inequality reduction experiences and will synthesize experiences of successful countries and policies, addressing the roots of inequality without compromising economic growth. In doing so, the report will shatter some myths and sharpen our knowledge of what works in reducing inequalities. Finally, it will also advocate for the need to expand and improve data collection—for example, data availability, comparability, and quality—and rigorous evidence on inequality impacts in order to deliver high-quality poverty and shared prosperity monitoring.Publication Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020-10-07)Previous Poverty and Shared Prosperity Reports have conveyed the difficult message that the world is not on track to meet the global goal of reducing extreme poverty to 3 percent by 2030. This edition brings the unwelcome news that COVID-19, along with conflict and climate change, has not merely slowed global poverty reduction but reversed it for first time in over twenty years. With COVID-19 predicted to push up to 100 million additional people into extreme poverty in 2020, trends in global poverty rates will be set back at least three years over the next decade. Today, 40 percent of the global poor live in fragile or conflict-affected situations, a share that could reach two-thirds by 2030. Multiple effects of climate change could drive an estimated 65 to 129 million people into poverty in the same period. “Reversing the reversal” will require responding effectively to COVID-19, conflict, and climate change while not losing focus on the challenges that most poor people continue to face most of the time. Though these are distinctive types of challenges, there is much to be learned from the initial response to COVID-19 that has broader implications for development policy and practice, just as decades of addressing more familiar development challenges yield insights that can inform responses to today’s unfamiliar but daunting ones. Solving novel problems requires rapid learning, open cooperation, and strategic coordination by everyone: from political leaders and scientists to practitioners and citizens.Publication The African Continental Free Trade Area(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020-07-27)The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement will create the largest free trade area in the world, measured by the number of countries participating. The pact will connect 1.3 billion people across 55 countries with a combined GDP valued at $3.4 trillion. It has the potential to lift 30 million people out of extreme poverty by 2035. But achieving its full potential will depend on putting in place significant policy reforms and trade facilitation measures. The scope of the agreement is considerable. It will reduce tariffs among member countries and cover policy areas, such as trade facilitation and services, as well as regulatory measures, such as sanitary standards and technical barriers to trade. It will complement existing subregional economic communities and trade agreements by offering a continent-wide regulatory framework and by regulating policy areas—such as investment and intellectual property rights protection—that have not been covered in most subregional agreements. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Economic and Distributional Effects quantifies the long-term implications of the agreement for growth, trade, poverty reduction, and employment. Its analysis goes beyond that in previous studies that have largely focused on tariff and nontariff barriers in goods—by including the effects of services and trade facilitation measures, as well as the distributional impacts on poverty, employment, and wages of female and male workers. It is designed to guide policy makers as they develop and implement the extensive range of reforms needed to realize the substantial rewards that the agreement offers. The analysis shows that full implementation of AfCFTA could boost income by 7 percent, or nearly $450 billion, in 2014 prices and market exchange rates. The agreement would also significantly expand African trade—particularly intraregional trade in manufacturing. In addition, it would increase employment opportunities and wages for unskilled workers and help close the wage gap between men and women.Publication Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018-10-17)The World Bank Group has two overarching goals: End extreme poverty by 2030 and promote shared prosperity by boosting the incomes of the bottom 40 percent of the population in each economy. As this year’s Poverty and Shared Prosperity report documents, the world continues to make progress toward these goals. In 2015, approximately one-tenth of the world’s population lived in extreme poverty, and the incomes of the bottom 40 percent rose in 77 percent of economies studied. But success cannot be taken for granted. Poverty remains high in Sub- Saharan Africa, as well as in fragile and conflict-affected states. At the same time, most of the world’s poor now live in middle-income countries, which tend to have higher national poverty lines. This year’s report tracks poverty comparisons at two higher poverty thresholds—$3.20 and $5.50 per day—which are typical of standards in lower- and upper-middle-income countries. In addition, the report introduces a societal poverty line based on each economy’s median income or consumption. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018: Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle also recognizes that poverty is not only about income and consumption—and it introduces a multidimensional poverty measure that adds other factors, such as access to education, electricity, drinking water, and sanitation. It also explores how inequality within households could affect the global profile of the poor. All these additional pieces enrich our understanding of the poverty puzzle, bringing us closer to solving it. For more information, please visit worldbank.org/PSPPublication Doing Business 2020(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020)Doing Business 2020 is the 17th in a series of annual studies investigating the regulations that enhance business activity and those that constrain it. It provides quantitative indicators covering 12 areas of the business environment in 190 economies. The goal of the Doing Business series is to provide objective data for use by governments in designing sound business regulatory policies and to encourage research on the important dimensions of the regulatory environment for firms.