Publication:
Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files in English
English PDF (1.03 MB)
1,196 downloads
English Text (117.69 KB)
31 downloads
Date
2018-06
ISSN
Published
2018-06
Author(s)
Laget, Edith
Osnago, Alberto
Rocha, Nadia
Abstract
Preferential trade agreements have become deeper over time, often encompassing policy areas that go beyond traditional trade policy, such as investment, competition, and intellectual property rights protection. In the literature, a prominent argument why countries sign "deep" agreements is to promote and facilitate the operation of global value chains. This paper exploits a new data set on the content of trade agreements and data on trade in value added and in parts and components, to quantify the impact of the depth of trade agreements on bilateral cross-border production linkages. The results show that adding a policy area to a trade agreement increases the domestic value added of intermediates (forward global value chain linkages) and the foreign value added of intermediates (backward global value chain linkages) by 0.48 and 0.38 percent, respectively. At the sectoral level, the positive impact of deep trade agreements is higher for higher value-added industries, suggesting that deep agreements help countries to integrate in industries with higher levels of value added. For a larger sample of countries and years, the results confirm that an additional provision in a trade agreement increases bilateral trade in parts and components by 0.3 percent. The content of trade agreements also matters for global value chain integration, but the impact varies by income group. Provisions outside the current mandate of the World Trade Organization (investment and competition policy) drive the effect of trade agreements on North-South trade in parts and components. Provisions under the current World Trade Organization mandate (tariff reduction and customs facilitation) drive the effect of trade agreements on South-South trade in parts and components.
Link to Data Set
Citation
Laget, Edith; Osnago, Alberto; Rocha, Nadia; Ruta, Michele. 2018. Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains. Policy Research Working Paper;No. 8491. © World Bank, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29945 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Report Series
Report Series
Other publications in this report series
  • Publication
    Should Farm Input Subsidy Programs Target Poor or Non-Poor Farmers? Evidence from Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Program
    (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-25) Darko, Francis Addeah
    This paper addresses the question of whether farm input subsidy programs should be targeted at non-poor farmers instead of poor farmers, using a two-wave, nationally representative panel data from Malawi. The question is addressed by estimating the net gain in maize yield for targeting non-poor farmers instead of poor farmers after accounting for the difference in inorganic fertilizer use efficiency and the difference in crowding-out of commercial fertilizer by subsidized fertilizer between the poor and non-poor farmers. Consumption expenditure is used to classify households into consumption poor and non-poor households, and an asset-based wealth index is used to classify households into asset poor and non-poor households. The difference in inorganic fertilizer use efficiency is estimated with a multilevel model of maize yield, and the difference in crowding out is estimated with a double hurdle model of demand for commercial, inorganic fertilizer. The results indicate that non-poor farmers are significantly more efficient in the use of inorganic fertilizer but have significantly higher levels of crowding out, compared to poor farmers. This suggests that there is a trade-off between targeting non-poor farmers and targeting poor farmers. However, further analysis of the trade-off indicates that targeting non-poor farmers instead of poor farmers, even after accounting for the difference in crowding out, would result in an overall gain in yield of 3.14 to 4.33 kilograms of maize per kilogram of nitrogen distributed by the subsidy program. Therefore, the productivity enhancing objective of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program would be better served by targeting non-poor farmers instead of poor farmers.
  • Publication
    Do Psychosocial Stimulation, Parental Distress and Early Childhood Education Enrollment Show Different Associations with Early Childhood Development Outcomes for Boys and Girls? Findings from a Phone Survey in Pakistan
    (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-25) Franchett, Emily; Hasan, Amer; Hentschel, Elizabeth; Tahir-Chowdhry, Mahreen; Tomlinson, Heather; Yousafzai, Aisha; Zamand, Mina
    This study examined whether psychosocial stimulation, parental distress, and enrollment in pre- primary education had different associations with early child development outcomes for boys and girls in Pakistan. Using data from a nationally representative phone survey in Pakistan, it assessed these relationships for two cohorts of children—those aged 0–35 months and those aged 36–72 months. The study found that among very young children (0–35 months), lower parental distress and higher psychosocial stimulation were strongly associated with better child development for both boys and girls. Girls were more sensitive to higher levels of parental distress and lower levels of psychosocial stimulation than boys. On average, girls in the sample fared worse compared to boys in their developmental outcomes in the context of low levels of stimulation and high levels of parental distress. Among the older age cohort (36–72 months), lower psychosocial stimulation and higher parental distress were each similarly associated with lower child development outcomes, regardless of child gender. Access to early childhood education was associated with better child development outcomes for both genders. The results confirm existing evidence that early learning opportunities in the first six years of life are important supports for promoting early child development for all children and suggest that girls aged 0–35 months in this sample may be uniquely sensitive to psychosocial stimulation and parental distress.
  • Publication
    Does Climbing the Jobs Ladder Promote Poverty Reduction ?
    (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-24) Choi, Yunji; Gronert, Mario; Honorati, Maddalena; Merfeld,, Joshua D,; Newhouse, David
    This paper explores trends in and the potential determinants of the types of jobs held by workers, and their relationship with poverty reduction, in an unbalanced panel of 89 countries over the past 30 years. Jobs are classified into five categories according to formality, occupation or level of skills required, and wage work versus self-employment. Net shifts into "upper tier" or skilled informal wage jobs, defined as professionals, managers, technicians, or clerks, from "lower tier" or lower skilled informal jobs were strongly associated with poverty reduction at the $1.90 and $3.20 lines. In contrast, net shifts into formal wage jobs from lower tier informal jobs were associated with modest poverty reductions at the $5.50 poverty line. The share of workers in informal upper tier jobs represents less than 2 percent of the workforce and has increased little over the past 30 years in low- and middle-income countries. The findings show that increases in upper tier informal wage jobs are associated with shifts of the workforce from microenterprises to small firms in lower- and upper-middle-income countries, but they are not discernibly associated with higher educational attainment or urbanization. In contrast, increases in the share of formal wage jobs are strongly associated with increases in the share of workers with post-secondary education, driven by high-income countries. The results suggest that upper tier informal wage jobs and the skills they require play a potentially important role in poverty reduction but are not automatically generated by increased educational attainment, urbanization, or firm size.
  • Publication
    Assessing Power System Disruptions and Associated Economic Impacts from Increasing Extreme Heat Events in Southeast Europe Using an Idealized Design Methodology Design Methodology
    (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-24) Farnham, David; Eisenberg, Ross; Bonnafous, Luc
    As the world endeavors to decarbonize and shift toward sustainable energy sources, power systems will become increasingly dependent on weather conditions. This dependence creates the challenge of managing fluctuations in both power supply and demand (particularly for cooling), which can jeopardize system reliability, particularly during extreme weather events. To what extent will the increases in peak cooling demands manifest more frequent power system disruptions, posing risks to human health and economic activity This paper focuses on urban centers in Southeast Europe and utilizes state-of-the-art climate simulations to estimate changes in the magnitude of extreme heat events. It also estimates the frequency of potential associated power system disruptions and their ensuing impacts on economic activity by assuming an idealized design methodology. The analysis reveals that between 2021 and 2070, urban centers in Southeast Europe may be at risk of an estimated four to nine power system disruptions per decade due to increasing trends in extreme heat events. These disruptions have the potential to incur annual economic costs of up to tens of millions of dollars in some cities. The projected disruptions highlight the challenges of adapting power systems to climate change, even with idealized regular redesign and maintenance efforts. To mitigate power system fragility during heat waves, the paper recommends implementing measures such as securing reserve power capacity, promoting urban cooling through greening initiatives, adopting demand-side management with smart-grid infrastructure, and increasing the deployment of solar power, which typically has high generation potential during heat waves.
  • Publication
    Trade Policies Mix and Match
    (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-24) Kee, Hiau Looi; Xie, Enze
    This paper studies the relationship between tariffs and non-tariff measures (NTMs) to understand the recent trade tensions with governments mixing trade policies, such as the European Union imposing NTMs on top of the tariffs on China’s electric vehicles. Results based on the latest bilateral-product-level NTMs show that overall tariffs and NTMs are policy substitutes. The substitutions are higher for high-income importing countries, low-income exporting countries, country pairs with deep trade agreements, and products with consumption externalities. A simple terms-of-trade model demonstrates how the welfare-maximizing government may mix trade policies to reduce consumption externalities from imports. Structural estimations confirm the results.
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Associated URLs
Associated content
Citations