Publication: Democratic Republic of the Congo Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions
Loading...
Published
2025-07-15
ISSN
Date
2025-07-15
Editor(s)
Abstract
The Democratic Republic of Congo is committed to achieving Universal Health Care by 2030. Progress toward this goal faces challenges due to limitations in the execution and allocation of the country's health budget. This contributes to health spending being predominantly financed by households and donors rather than the government. The only part of the government health budget that is consistently executed in line with allocations is for health worker payments. Execution rates for other spending categories are volatile and generally low. Many parts of the budget are not executed at all, while some activities are implemented without having been included in the budget. Budget execution within the Ministry of Health is influenced by both internal and external factors. Inconsistencies between strategic planning, budget preparation, and execution processes hinder effective financial management; inaccurate cost estimations; heavy reliance on exceptional procedures for spending and over-execution of specific budget lines to the detriment of otherwise planned activities. External challenges include a systematic over-estimation of national revenue; the highly centralized nature of budget execution processes; the dominance of health worker payments in budget allocations; the non-respect of budget management rules and cumbersome procurement and expenditure execution procedures.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“Cros, Marion Jane; El Kadiri El Yamani, Fatima; Muvudi, Michel; Nana, Aminata TOU. 2025. Democratic Republic of the Congo Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43458 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Ethiopia Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)Ethiopia achieves a high overall rate of execution of its health budget. From 2016 to 2021 the health budget execution rate averaged 95 percent of the original budget allocation. The health budget execution rate was higher than the execution rates for overall government spending. The execution rate also increased each year. Nonetheless, the execution rate for regions was lower than for the federal government. The execution of the capital budget was also weaker, particularly at the regional and woreda levels. Data on execution rates for specific government programs are not available and may involve much more volatility than aggregated execution rates. Development partner spending managed outside of the federal Treasury also had much higher volatility in execution. Good practices that underpin Ethiopia's high execution rates include relatively low levels of arrears; reasonable turnaround times for payroll changes and high accuracy of payroll expenditures; timeliness and good communication of budgeting processes; and shortening of timeframes for transfers from federal to decentralized levels. Areas that hold back the quality of budget execution include limited transparency on execution data; capacity constraints at the facility and woreda levels; external resources being managed outside of government systems; limited flexibility of spending for health facilities; and overly simplified procurement processes that prioritise only the lowest price.Publication Pakistan Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)Pakistan’s overall national health budget had a high rate of execution from 2016 to 2019, averaging 95 percent. However, execution rates between provinces as well as between categories of spending varied significantly. At the health facility level, execution of spending is notably challenging, particularly for non-wage expenditure. Good practices that facilitated better budget execution included strong integration of payroll and personnel records in most provinces as well as the contracting out of the provision of primary healthcare services to the private sector in Sindh, Baluchistan, and Punjab Provinces. This approach has facilitated more consistent budget execution rates and evidence of resources reaching the facility level. There remain challenges, however, with ensuring the accountability of how these resources are used. The main bottlenecks holding back the quality of budget execution include an inability to track primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare budgets and their execution; systematic over-estimation of resources by the provinces; weaknesses in budget preparation processes; inefficiency in spending control processes; lack of autonomy for primary healthcare facilities; insufficient integration of vertical programs in local health systems; and lack of a process for capturing spending arrears.Publication Solomon Islands Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Solomon Islands government plays key roles in the health sector, as a funder, regulator, and provider of nearly all health services. Health services are funded, managed, and delivered by the Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS). The MHMS also allocates resources (such as funding, staff, and supplies) to its provincial health services, which are part of the MHMS rather than the provincial governments, to deliver health services in the provinces on behalf of the MHMS. Most health facilities are government-owned, with a few operated by churches. However, church-owned facilities receive annual budget allocations, human resources, medical supplies, and capital investments from the government. There are privately owned outpatient facilities, but these are mainly found in urban areas. There is no social health insurance or separate agency for buying healthcare services.Publication Lao PDR Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Lao People's Democratic Republic has a high execution rate for its overall health budget, ranging from 89 to 104 percent from 2015 to 2019. Aggregated execution rates are generally high across the main categories of spending - wage, non-wage recurrent and capital with only a couple of outliers during the period of analysis. Some of the public financial management practices employed that enable these high execution rates may, nonetheless, risk lowering the quality of spending. There is also greater variation in execution rates when considering more disaggregated levels of budget spending, including between the central and provincial level of government. Good practices that have helped budget execution include the ringfencing of spending on health and flexibility in budget laws enabling high execution of capital budgets. Key bottlenecks holding back budget execution performance include the lack of a mechanism linking spending to the delivery of outputs; weaknesses in how budget allocations are set for health worker payments; delays in payments reaching health facilities; a lack of transparency in disaggregated spending data, no publication of audits and no reporting on the stock of arrears; inefficiencies in the availability of resources for health facilities; and the widespread use of manual reporting which delays reporting processes and is prone to errors and inconsistencies.Publication Budget Execution in Health(World Health Organization and the World Bank, 2025-03-11)This report builds on a joint WHO-World Bank initiative on budget execution challenges (described in more detail in Appendix 1). Following the introduction, section 2 provides an overview of core concepts from both a public financial management perspective and a health financing perspective and discusses how budget execution challenges can differ in countries with a separate purchasing agency, varying degrees of decentralization and significant donor funding. The trends and patterns in health budget execution data are analyzed and discussed in section 3. The analytical approach is detailed in Appendix 2. Section 4 identifies challenges that hinder good budget execution in health. These are drawn from an extensive literature review and a set of case studies. A summary of the case studies is provided in Appendix 3. Policy responses to these challenges are offered in section 5. This section lays out a pragmatic approach that Ministries of Finance, Ministries of Health and local governments can take to address six of the most frequently encountered budget execution challenges and points to examples from cases studies. Section 6 offers an engagement approach to address budget execution challenges. A four step diagnostic-to-solution model is proposed that guides an analyst through the process of identifying the right questions, data, and policy options in a structured manner. Section 7 concludes with a call to action for countries to embrace a more purposeful and collaborative budget implementation approach that involves finance, health and local government stakeholders. The compiled dataset used for the analysis is being released jointly with this report to support complementary analytical efforts.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Global Economic Prospects, June 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-10)The global economy is facing another substantial headwind, emanating largely from an increase in trade tensions and heightened global policy uncertainty. For emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), the ability to boost job creation and reduce extreme poverty has declined. Key downside risks include a further escalation of trade barriers and continued policy uncertainty. These challenges are exacerbated by subdued foreign direct investment into EMDEs. Global cooperation is needed to restore a more stable international trade environment and scale up support for vulnerable countries grappling with conflict, debt burdens, and climate change. Domestic policy action is also critical to contain inflation risks and strengthen fiscal resilience. To accelerate job creation and long-term growth, structural reforms must focus on raising institutional quality, attracting private investment, and strengthening human capital and labor markets. Countries in fragile and conflict situations face daunting development challenges that will require tailored domestic policy reforms and well-coordinated multilateral support.Publication Business Ready 2024(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-03)Business Ready (B-READY) is a new World Bank Group corporate flagship report that evaluates the business and investment climate worldwide. It replaces and improves upon the Doing Business project. B-READY provides a comprehensive data set and description of the factors that strengthen the private sector, not only by advancing the interests of individual firms but also by elevating the interests of workers, consumers, potential new enterprises, and the natural environment. This 2024 report introduces a new analytical framework that benchmarks economies based on three pillars: Regulatory Framework, Public Services, and Operational Efficiency. The analysis centers on 10 topics essential for private sector development that correspond to various stages of the life cycle of a firm. The report also offers insights into three cross-cutting themes that are relevant for modern economies: digital adoption, environmental sustainability, and gender. B-READY draws on a robust data collection process that includes specially tailored expert questionnaires and firm-level surveys. The 2024 report, which covers 50 economies, serves as the first in a series that will expand in geographical coverage and refine its methodology over time, supporting reform advocacy, policy guidance, and further analysis and research.Publication Disentangling the Key Economic Channels through Which Infrastructure Affects Jobs(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-04-03)This paper takes stock of the literature on infrastructure and jobs published since the early 2000s, using a conceptual framework to identify the key channels through which different types of infrastructure impact jobs. Where relevant, it highlights the different approaches and findings in the cases of energy, digital, and transport infrastructure. Overall, the literature review provides strong evidence of infrastructure’s positive impact on employment, particularly for women. In the case of electricity, this impact arises from freeing time that would otherwise be spent on household tasks. Similarly, digital infrastructure, particularly mobile phone coverage, has demonstrated positive labor market effects, often driven by private sector investments rather than large public expenditures, which are typically required for other large-scale infrastructure projects. The evidence on structural transformation is also positive, with some notable exceptions, such as studies that find no significant impact on structural transformation in rural India in the cases of electricity and roads. Even with better market connections, remote areas may continue to lack economic opportunities, due to the absence of agglomeration economies and complementary inputs such as human capital. Accordingly, reducing transport costs alone may not be sufficient to drive economic transformation in rural areas. The spatial dimension of transformation is particularly relevant for transport, both internationally—by enhancing trade integration—and within countries, where economic development tends to drive firms and jobs toward urban centers, benefitting from economies scale and network effects. Turning to organizational transformation, evidence on skill bias in developing countries is more mixed than in developed countries and may vary considerably by context. Further research, especially on the possible reasons explaining the differences between developed and developing economies, is needed.Publication State of Social Protection Report 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-04-07)Social protection goes well beyond cash transfers; it includes policies and programs that bridge skill, financial, and information gaps, aiding people in securing better jobs. The three pillars of social protection—social assistance, social insurance, and labor market programs—support households and workers in handling crises, escaping poverty, facing transitions, and seizing employment opportunities. But despite a substantial expansion over the past decade, 2 billion people remain uncovered or inadequately covered across low- and middle-income countries. Drawing from administrative and household survey data from the World Bank’s Atlas of Social Protection Indicators of Resilience and Equity (ASPIRE), the "State of Social Protection Report 2025: The 2-Billion-Person Challenge" documents advances and challenges to strengthening social protection and labor systems across low- and middle-income countries, analyzing the evolution of expenditure, coverage, and adequacy of support. This report details four policy action areas governments can embrace to maximize the benefits of adequate social protection for all: extending social protection to those in need; strengthening the adequacy of social protection support; building shock-proof social protection systems; and optimizing social protection financing. The report discusses how the path of reforms will depend on country context, capacity, and fiscal space. The rising frequency of shocks and crises calls for major investments in the adaptability and preparedness of social protection and labor systems. Amid a world in transition, social protection is more important and necessary than ever.Publication Global Economic Prospects, January 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-01-16)Global growth is expected to hold steady at 2.7 percent in 2025-26. However, the global economy appears to be settling at a low growth rate that will be insufficient to foster sustained economic development—with the possibility of further headwinds from heightened policy uncertainty and adverse trade policy shifts, geopolitical tensions, persistent inflation, and climate-related natural disasters. Against this backdrop, emerging market and developing economies are set to enter the second quarter of the twenty-first century with per capita incomes on a trajectory that implies substantially slower catch-up toward advanced-economy living standards than they previously experienced. Without course corrections, most low-income countries are unlikely to graduate to middle-income status by the middle of the century. Policy action at both global and national levels is needed to foster a more favorable external environment, enhance macroeconomic stability, reduce structural constraints, address the effects of climate change, and thus accelerate long-term growth and development.