Publication: Pakistan Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions
Loading...
Date
2025-07-15
ISSN
Published
2025-07-15
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Pakistan’s overall national health budget had a high rate of execution from 2016 to 2019, averaging 95 percent. However, execution rates between provinces as well as between categories of spending varied significantly. At the health facility level, execution of spending is notably challenging, particularly for non-wage expenditure. Good practices that facilitated better budget execution included strong integration of payroll and personnel records in most provinces as well as the contracting out of the provision of primary healthcare services to the private sector in Sindh, Baluchistan, and Punjab Provinces. This approach has facilitated more consistent budget execution rates and evidence of resources reaching the facility level. There remain challenges, however, with ensuring the accountability of how these resources are used. The main bottlenecks holding back the quality of budget execution include an inability to track primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare budgets and their execution; systematic over-estimation of resources by the provinces; weaknesses in budget preparation processes; inefficiency in spending control processes; lack of autonomy for primary healthcare facilities; insufficient integration of vertical programs in local health systems; and lack of a process for capturing spending arrears.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“Hadi, Qurat ul Ain; Verhaghe, Johan; Yunus, Hammad. 2025. Pakistan Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43460 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Democratic Republic of the Congo Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Democratic Republic of Congo is committed to achieving Universal Health Care by 2030. Progress toward this goal faces challenges due to limitations in the execution and allocation of the country's health budget. This contributes to health spending being predominantly financed by households and donors rather than the government. The only part of the government health budget that is consistently executed in line with allocations is for health worker payments. Execution rates for other spending categories are volatile and generally low. Many parts of the budget are not executed at all, while some activities are implemented without having been included in the budget. Budget execution within the Ministry of Health is influenced by both internal and external factors. Inconsistencies between strategic planning, budget preparation, and execution processes hinder effective financial management; inaccurate cost estimations; heavy reliance on exceptional procedures for spending and over-execution of specific budget lines to the detriment of otherwise planned activities. External challenges include a systematic over-estimation of national revenue; the highly centralized nature of budget execution processes; the dominance of health worker payments in budget allocations; the non-respect of budget management rules and cumbersome procurement and expenditure execution procedures.Publication Budget Execution in Health(World Health Organization and the World Bank, 2025-03-11)This report builds on a joint WHO-World Bank initiative on budget execution challenges (described in more detail in Appendix 1). Following the introduction, section 2 provides an overview of core concepts from both a public financial management perspective and a health financing perspective and discusses how budget execution challenges can differ in countries with a separate purchasing agency, varying degrees of decentralization and significant donor funding. The trends and patterns in health budget execution data are analyzed and discussed in section 3. The analytical approach is detailed in Appendix 2. Section 4 identifies challenges that hinder good budget execution in health. These are drawn from an extensive literature review and a set of case studies. A summary of the case studies is provided in Appendix 3. Policy responses to these challenges are offered in section 5. This section lays out a pragmatic approach that Ministries of Finance, Ministries of Health and local governments can take to address six of the most frequently encountered budget execution challenges and points to examples from cases studies. Section 6 offers an engagement approach to address budget execution challenges. A four step diagnostic-to-solution model is proposed that guides an analyst through the process of identifying the right questions, data, and policy options in a structured manner. Section 7 concludes with a call to action for countries to embrace a more purposeful and collaborative budget implementation approach that involves finance, health and local government stakeholders. The compiled dataset used for the analysis is being released jointly with this report to support complementary analytical efforts.Publication Ethiopia Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)Ethiopia achieves a high overall rate of execution of its health budget. From 2016 to 2021 the health budget execution rate averaged 95 percent of the original budget allocation. The health budget execution rate was higher than the execution rates for overall government spending. The execution rate also increased each year. Nonetheless, the execution rate for regions was lower than for the federal government. The execution of the capital budget was also weaker, particularly at the regional and woreda levels. Data on execution rates for specific government programs are not available and may involve much more volatility than aggregated execution rates. Development partner spending managed outside of the federal Treasury also had much higher volatility in execution. Good practices that underpin Ethiopia's high execution rates include relatively low levels of arrears; reasonable turnaround times for payroll changes and high accuracy of payroll expenditures; timeliness and good communication of budgeting processes; and shortening of timeframes for transfers from federal to decentralized levels. Areas that hold back the quality of budget execution include limited transparency on execution data; capacity constraints at the facility and woreda levels; external resources being managed outside of government systems; limited flexibility of spending for health facilities; and overly simplified procurement processes that prioritise only the lowest price.Publication Solomon Islands Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Solomon Islands government plays key roles in the health sector, as a funder, regulator, and provider of nearly all health services. Health services are funded, managed, and delivered by the Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS). The MHMS also allocates resources (such as funding, staff, and supplies) to its provincial health services, which are part of the MHMS rather than the provincial governments, to deliver health services in the provinces on behalf of the MHMS. Most health facilities are government-owned, with a few operated by churches. However, church-owned facilities receive annual budget allocations, human resources, medical supplies, and capital investments from the government. There are privately owned outpatient facilities, but these are mainly found in urban areas. There is no social health insurance or separate agency for buying healthcare services.Publication Lao PDR Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Lao People's Democratic Republic has a high execution rate for its overall health budget, ranging from 89 to 104 percent from 2015 to 2019. Aggregated execution rates are generally high across the main categories of spending - wage, non-wage recurrent and capital with only a couple of outliers during the period of analysis. Some of the public financial management practices employed that enable these high execution rates may, nonetheless, risk lowering the quality of spending. There is also greater variation in execution rates when considering more disaggregated levels of budget spending, including between the central and provincial level of government. Good practices that have helped budget execution include the ringfencing of spending on health and flexibility in budget laws enabling high execution of capital budgets. Key bottlenecks holding back budget execution performance include the lack of a mechanism linking spending to the delivery of outputs; weaknesses in how budget allocations are set for health worker payments; delays in payments reaching health facilities; a lack of transparency in disaggregated spending data, no publication of audits and no reporting on the stock of arrears; inefficiencies in the availability of resources for health facilities; and the widespread use of manual reporting which delays reporting processes and is prone to errors and inconsistencies.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Budget Execution in Health(World Health Organization and the World Bank, 2025-03-11)This report builds on a joint WHO-World Bank initiative on budget execution challenges (described in more detail in Appendix 1). Following the introduction, section 2 provides an overview of core concepts from both a public financial management perspective and a health financing perspective and discusses how budget execution challenges can differ in countries with a separate purchasing agency, varying degrees of decentralization and significant donor funding. The trends and patterns in health budget execution data are analyzed and discussed in section 3. The analytical approach is detailed in Appendix 2. Section 4 identifies challenges that hinder good budget execution in health. These are drawn from an extensive literature review and a set of case studies. A summary of the case studies is provided in Appendix 3. Policy responses to these challenges are offered in section 5. This section lays out a pragmatic approach that Ministries of Finance, Ministries of Health and local governments can take to address six of the most frequently encountered budget execution challenges and points to examples from cases studies. Section 6 offers an engagement approach to address budget execution challenges. A four step diagnostic-to-solution model is proposed that guides an analyst through the process of identifying the right questions, data, and policy options in a structured manner. Section 7 concludes with a call to action for countries to embrace a more purposeful and collaborative budget implementation approach that involves finance, health and local government stakeholders. The compiled dataset used for the analysis is being released jointly with this report to support complementary analytical efforts.Publication Port Reform Toolkit(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-31)Ports are undergoing constant transformation, induced by changes in the global economy, technology, or the environment. Port reform is influenced by factors that include aspirations for change underpinned by complex internal and external drivers. In a sector where public and private interests must work together, closely managing change is important. Having the right tools is key for a successful port reform and improvement process which enables economic growth, creates jobs, and fosters sustainable development. For over two decades, the Port Reform Toolkit has been one of the most comprehensive guides for implementing port reforms. Along the way, the Toolkit has evolved in response to changing sectoral trends. The first edition, published in 2001, established a common language for policymakers and port industry stakeholders. It has since become the established reference for port privatization, labor, and modernization programs. Further experiences from a first wave of port reforms in Latin America, Africa, and Asia in the 1990s and early 2000s informed the second edition of the Toolkit, which was released in 2007. By that time, ports in developing economies had attracted over 21 billion dollars in investments from over 200 public-private partnership projects. In this context, the Port Reform Toolkit enabled port stakeholders to provide strategic advice to governments and the private sector.Publication Mapping Impact In Chad(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-25)In the Sahel, Adaptive Social Protection (ASP) is a set of social protection policies, systems, and programs that promote human capital, productivity, and resilience of the poorest and strengthen their capacity to prepare for, cope with, and adapt to shocks. Through the delivery of regular social safety nets, productive inclusion interventions, and shock-responsive programs, ASP has demonstrated strong positive impacts on various dimensions in the Sahel. For the poorest and most vulnerable, it has resulted in improvements in household welfare and food security, productivity, and resilience. More broadly, it has shown significant positive impacts on the economy, society, and future generations.Publication Indonesia Economic Prospects, June 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-23)Indonesia’s economy remains resilient amid worsening global conditions. GDP grew at 4.9 percent year-on-year (yoy) in Q1-2025, slightly lower than previous post-pandemic quarters. Domestic demand was impacted by reduced government consumption and lower investment. Budget efficiency measures led to a contraction in public consumption, while investment in the construction and manufacturing sectors dipped due to investors’ concerns over domestic and global policy uncertainty. Meanwhile, declining commodity prices worsened Indonesia’s terms of trade. The supply side showed notable contributions from the agriculture and services sectors. Businesses and households are adjusting to economic uncertainty, but weak consumption of middle-class households has been persistent since the pandemic. The GOI structural reform agenda could accelerate growth further. In response to rising global policy uncertainty, the GOI devised a program of deregulation including reforms to the business environment and licensing, investment liberalization, trade and logistics reforms, and digital services. These reforms complement other reforms currently in play, like those related to financial sector deepening, and accompany the demand stimulus that the GOI is targeting through its priority programs. If implemented, these reforms could gradually expand the economy’s capacity, unlock further FDI, boost investment returns, and ensure productivity gains. The report suggests that this will translate into better job creation and raise GDP growth to 5.3-5.5 percent in 2026-2027. This report identifies the necessary steps to reach the target of providing 3 million housing units each year. In short, to meet the housing target and supercharge current efforts, the government needs to act as both a housing provider and a housing facilitator: instituting housing regulation reforms, accelerating public-funded housing programs, and creating an enabling environment that attracts private investment in Indonesia. Directly, 3.8 billion dollars in annual public investments can create an estimated 2.3 million jobs and mobilize 2.8 billion dollars in private capital. Reforms can create an enabling environment for housing investments and indirectly help multiply this impact.Publication Algeria Economic Update, Spring 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-20)Algeria’s economic growth remained robust in 2024 but is expected to slow moderately in 2025. Strong investment momentum and robust growth in household consumption, both fueled by government spending, supported manufacturing and services activity, while agricultural production accelerated. However, growth in domestic demand boosted imports, which, combined with lower hydrocarbon production and exports, weighed on growth. Overall, non-hydrocarbon GDP grew at a pace of 4.8 percent, offsetting the 1.4 percent contraction in GDP from hydrocarbons. Real GDP growth is projected at 3.3 percent in 2025, driven by the rebound in growth in the hydrocarbon sectors (+1.6 percent), boosted by the recovery of OPEC production quotas and gas production. Non-hydrocarbon growth is expected to slow (+3.6 percent), driven by the expected consolidation of public spending, which would be more marked for investment. Agricultural production is expected to remain robust despite limited rainfall, offsetting the slowdown in industry and services. The analysis of productivity trends in different sectors offers avenues for reflection to accelerate the structural transformation of the Algerian economy. The public-spending-led growth model resulted in important economic and social achievements in the 2000s, before slowing down in the last decade as the pace of spending growth became unsustainable. In doing so, this growth model has steered employment to low-value-added sectors, including non-commercial services and construction. In addition, a comparative analysis of Algerian productivity suggests a heterogeneous performance, with strong momentum in the agricultural sector contrasting with limited gains in the manufacturing sector. Thus, a growth acceleration could be achieved by increasing productivity gains in the manufacturing and services sectors, on the one hand, and a gradual reallocation of employment to high-value-added sectors on the other, combined with a gradual rebalancing of public spending. Such an economic transformation calls for targeted cross-cutting and sectoral policies to support growth and jobs in the private sector, while equipping workers with the necessary skills.