Publication: Ethiopia Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions
Loading...
Published
2025-07-15
ISSN
Date
2025-07-15
Editor(s)
Abstract
Ethiopia achieves a high overall rate of execution of its health budget. From 2016 to 2021 the health budget execution rate averaged 95 percent of the original budget allocation. The health budget execution rate was higher than the execution rates for overall government spending. The execution rate also increased each year. Nonetheless, the execution rate for regions was lower than for the federal government. The execution of the capital budget was also weaker, particularly at the regional and woreda levels. Data on execution rates for specific government programs are not available and may involve much more volatility than aggregated execution rates. Development partner spending managed outside of the federal Treasury also had much higher volatility in execution. Good practices that underpin Ethiopia's high execution rates include relatively low levels of arrears; reasonable turnaround times for payroll changes and high accuracy of payroll expenditures; timeliness and good communication of budgeting processes; and shortening of timeframes for transfers from federal to decentralized levels. Areas that hold back the quality of budget execution include limited transparency on execution data; capacity constraints at the facility and woreda levels; external resources being managed outside of government systems; limited flexibility of spending for health facilities; and overly simplified procurement processes that prioritise only the lowest price.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“Cros, Marion Jane; Guracha, Tseganeh Amsalu; Schramm, Noemi; Adugna, Mideksa. 2025. Ethiopia Budget Execution in Health: From Bottlenecks to Solutions. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43459 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Democratic Republic of the Congo Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Democratic Republic of Congo is committed to achieving Universal Health Care by 2030. Progress toward this goal faces challenges due to limitations in the execution and allocation of the country's health budget. This contributes to health spending being predominantly financed by households and donors rather than the government. The only part of the government health budget that is consistently executed in line with allocations is for health worker payments. Execution rates for other spending categories are volatile and generally low. Many parts of the budget are not executed at all, while some activities are implemented without having been included in the budget. Budget execution within the Ministry of Health is influenced by both internal and external factors. Inconsistencies between strategic planning, budget preparation, and execution processes hinder effective financial management; inaccurate cost estimations; heavy reliance on exceptional procedures for spending and over-execution of specific budget lines to the detriment of otherwise planned activities. External challenges include a systematic over-estimation of national revenue; the highly centralized nature of budget execution processes; the dominance of health worker payments in budget allocations; the non-respect of budget management rules and cumbersome procurement and expenditure execution procedures.Publication Lao PDR Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Lao People's Democratic Republic has a high execution rate for its overall health budget, ranging from 89 to 104 percent from 2015 to 2019. Aggregated execution rates are generally high across the main categories of spending - wage, non-wage recurrent and capital with only a couple of outliers during the period of analysis. Some of the public financial management practices employed that enable these high execution rates may, nonetheless, risk lowering the quality of spending. There is also greater variation in execution rates when considering more disaggregated levels of budget spending, including between the central and provincial level of government. Good practices that have helped budget execution include the ringfencing of spending on health and flexibility in budget laws enabling high execution of capital budgets. Key bottlenecks holding back budget execution performance include the lack of a mechanism linking spending to the delivery of outputs; weaknesses in how budget allocations are set for health worker payments; delays in payments reaching health facilities; a lack of transparency in disaggregated spending data, no publication of audits and no reporting on the stock of arrears; inefficiencies in the availability of resources for health facilities; and the widespread use of manual reporting which delays reporting processes and is prone to errors and inconsistencies.Publication Budget Execution in Health(World Health Organization and the World Bank, 2025-03-11)This report builds on a joint WHO-World Bank initiative on budget execution challenges (described in more detail in Appendix 1). Following the introduction, section 2 provides an overview of core concepts from both a public financial management perspective and a health financing perspective and discusses how budget execution challenges can differ in countries with a separate purchasing agency, varying degrees of decentralization and significant donor funding. The trends and patterns in health budget execution data are analyzed and discussed in section 3. The analytical approach is detailed in Appendix 2. Section 4 identifies challenges that hinder good budget execution in health. These are drawn from an extensive literature review and a set of case studies. A summary of the case studies is provided in Appendix 3. Policy responses to these challenges are offered in section 5. This section lays out a pragmatic approach that Ministries of Finance, Ministries of Health and local governments can take to address six of the most frequently encountered budget execution challenges and points to examples from cases studies. Section 6 offers an engagement approach to address budget execution challenges. A four step diagnostic-to-solution model is proposed that guides an analyst through the process of identifying the right questions, data, and policy options in a structured manner. Section 7 concludes with a call to action for countries to embrace a more purposeful and collaborative budget implementation approach that involves finance, health and local government stakeholders. The compiled dataset used for the analysis is being released jointly with this report to support complementary analytical efforts.Publication Solomon Islands Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)The Solomon Islands government plays key roles in the health sector, as a funder, regulator, and provider of nearly all health services. Health services are funded, managed, and delivered by the Ministry of Health and Medical Services (MHMS). The MHMS also allocates resources (such as funding, staff, and supplies) to its provincial health services, which are part of the MHMS rather than the provincial governments, to deliver health services in the provinces on behalf of the MHMS. Most health facilities are government-owned, with a few operated by churches. However, church-owned facilities receive annual budget allocations, human resources, medical supplies, and capital investments from the government. There are privately owned outpatient facilities, but these are mainly found in urban areas. There is no social health insurance or separate agency for buying healthcare services.Publication Pakistan Budget Execution in Health(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-15)Pakistan’s overall national health budget had a high rate of execution from 2016 to 2019, averaging 95 percent. However, execution rates between provinces as well as between categories of spending varied significantly. At the health facility level, execution of spending is notably challenging, particularly for non-wage expenditure. Good practices that facilitated better budget execution included strong integration of payroll and personnel records in most provinces as well as the contracting out of the provision of primary healthcare services to the private sector in Sindh, Baluchistan, and Punjab Provinces. This approach has facilitated more consistent budget execution rates and evidence of resources reaching the facility level. There remain challenges, however, with ensuring the accountability of how these resources are used. The main bottlenecks holding back the quality of budget execution include an inability to track primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare budgets and their execution; systematic over-estimation of resources by the provinces; weaknesses in budget preparation processes; inefficiency in spending control processes; lack of autonomy for primary healthcare facilities; insufficient integration of vertical programs in local health systems; and lack of a process for capturing spending arrears.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication The Container Port Performance Index 2023(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-07-18)The Container Port Performance Index (CPPI) measures the time container ships spend in port, making it an important point of reference for stakeholders in the global economy. These stakeholders include port authorities and operators, national governments, supranational organizations, development agencies, and other public and private players in trade and logistics. The index highlights where vessel time in container ports could be improved. Streamlining these processes would benefit all parties involved, including shipping lines, national governments, and consumers. This fourth edition of the CPPI relies on data from 405 container ports with at least 24 container ship port calls in the calendar year 2023. As in earlier editions of the CPPI, the ranking employs two different methodological approaches: an administrative (technical) approach and a statistical approach (using matrix factorization). Combining these two approaches ensures that the overall ranking of container ports reflects actual port performance as closely as possible while also being statistically robust. The CPPI methodology assesses the sequential steps of a container ship port call. ‘Total port hours’ refers to the total time elapsed from the moment a ship arrives at the port until the vessel leaves the berth after completing its cargo operations. The CPPI uses time as an indicator because time is very important to shipping lines, ports, and the entire logistics chain. However, time, as captured by the CPPI, is not the only way to measure port efficiency, so it does not tell the entire story of a port’s performance. Factors that can influence the time vessels spend in ports can be location-specific and under the port’s control (endogenous) or external and beyond the control of the port (exogenous). The CPPI measures time spent in container ports, strictly based on quantitative data only, which do not reveal the underlying factors or root causes of extended port times. A detailed port-specific diagnostic would be required to assess the contribution of underlying factors to the time a vessel spends in port. A very low ranking or a significant change in ranking may warrant special attention, for which the World Bank generally recommends a detailed diagnostic.Publication Digital Progress and Trends Report 2023(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-03-05)Digitalization is the transformational opportunity of our time. The digital sector has become a powerhouse of innovation, economic growth, and job creation. Value added in the IT services sector grew at 8 percent annually during 2000–22, nearly twice as fast as the global economy. Employment growth in IT services reached 7 percent annually, six times higher than total employment growth. The diffusion and adoption of digital technologies are just as critical as their invention. Digital uptake has accelerated since the COVID-19 pandemic, with 1.5 billion new internet users added from 2018 to 2022. The share of firms investing in digital solutions around the world has more than doubled from 2020 to 2022. Low-income countries, vulnerable populations, and small firms, however, have been falling behind, while transformative digital innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) have been accelerating in higher-income countries. Although more than 90 percent of the population in high-income countries was online in 2022, only one in four people in low-income countries used the internet, and the speed of their connection was typically only a small fraction of that in wealthier countries. As businesses in technologically advanced countries integrate generative AI into their products and services, less than half of the businesses in many low- and middle-income countries have an internet connection. The growing digital divide is exacerbating the poverty and productivity gaps between richer and poorer economies. The Digital Progress and Trends Report series will track global digitalization progress and highlight policy trends, debates, and implications for low- and middle-income countries. The series adds to the global efforts to study the progress and trends of digitalization in two main ways: · By compiling, curating, and analyzing data from diverse sources to present a comprehensive picture of digitalization in low- and middle-income countries, including in-depth analyses on understudied topics. · By developing insights on policy opportunities, challenges, and debates and reflecting the perspectives of various stakeholders and the World Bank’s operational experiences. This report, the first in the series, aims to inform evidence-based policy making and motivate action among internal and external audiences and stakeholders. The report will bring global attention to high-performing countries that have valuable experience to share as well as to areas where efforts will need to be redoubled.Publication Global Economic Prospects, January 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-01-16)Global growth is expected to hold steady at 2.7 percent in 2025-26. However, the global economy appears to be settling at a low growth rate that will be insufficient to foster sustained economic development—with the possibility of further headwinds from heightened policy uncertainty and adverse trade policy shifts, geopolitical tensions, persistent inflation, and climate-related natural disasters. Against this backdrop, emerging market and developing economies are set to enter the second quarter of the twenty-first century with per capita incomes on a trajectory that implies substantially slower catch-up toward advanced-economy living standards than they previously experienced. Without course corrections, most low-income countries are unlikely to graduate to middle-income status by the middle of the century. Policy action at both global and national levels is needed to foster a more favorable external environment, enhance macroeconomic stability, reduce structural constraints, address the effects of climate change, and thus accelerate long-term growth and development.Publication Business Ready 2024(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-03)Business Ready (B-READY) is a new World Bank Group corporate flagship report that evaluates the business and investment climate worldwide. It replaces and improves upon the Doing Business project. B-READY provides a comprehensive data set and description of the factors that strengthen the private sector, not only by advancing the interests of individual firms but also by elevating the interests of workers, consumers, potential new enterprises, and the natural environment. This 2024 report introduces a new analytical framework that benchmarks economies based on three pillars: Regulatory Framework, Public Services, and Operational Efficiency. The analysis centers on 10 topics essential for private sector development that correspond to various stages of the life cycle of a firm. The report also offers insights into three cross-cutting themes that are relevant for modern economies: digital adoption, environmental sustainability, and gender. B-READY draws on a robust data collection process that includes specially tailored expert questionnaires and firm-level surveys. The 2024 report, which covers 50 economies, serves as the first in a series that will expand in geographical coverage and refine its methodology over time, supporting reform advocacy, policy guidance, and further analysis and research.Publication Global Economic Prospects, June 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-10)The global economy is facing another substantial headwind, emanating largely from an increase in trade tensions and heightened global policy uncertainty. For emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), the ability to boost job creation and reduce extreme poverty has declined. Key downside risks include a further escalation of trade barriers and continued policy uncertainty. These challenges are exacerbated by subdued foreign direct investment into EMDEs. Global cooperation is needed to restore a more stable international trade environment and scale up support for vulnerable countries grappling with conflict, debt burdens, and climate change. Domestic policy action is also critical to contain inflation risks and strengthen fiscal resilience. To accelerate job creation and long-term growth, structural reforms must focus on raising institutional quality, attracting private investment, and strengthening human capital and labor markets. Countries in fragile and conflict situations face daunting development challenges that will require tailored domestic policy reforms and well-coordinated multilateral support.