Publication:
Croatia - Management of Earthquake Risk

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files in English
English PDF (3.26 MB)
3 downloads
English Text (334.22 KB)
1 downloads
Published
2025-09-29
ISSN
Date
2025-10-08
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Croatia faces significant earthquake risk due to its moderate to high seismic activity and its vulnerable, aging buildings and other infrastructure. Although earthquakes are comparatively rare in Croatia, they nonetheless pose considerable risk. In 2020, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the country experienced a series of earthquakes, some of the strongest since 1880: earthquakes in March (M5.5) and December (M6.2) caused an estimated Euro 16.1 billion in damage and economic losses, according to the Rapid Damage and Needs Assessments (RDNAs) carried out in their aftermath.10 The reconstruction and recovery needs were extensive, with estimated costs of Euro 25.9 billion (Euro 17.5 billion for the March earthquake and Euro 8.4 billion for the December earthquake). These recent events highlight the urgent need to proactively manage earthquake risk. This report summarizes the results of a rapid review of earthquake risk and risk management capacity in Croatia, highlighting potential risk management actions and investment opportunities to inform policy dialogue and future research. The review considers capacity across multiple dimensions, including governance, understanding of earthquake risk, risk reduction and mitigation, early warning and public awareness, preparedness and emergency response, recovery and post-disaster financing, and cross-cutting topics such as social resilience and the role of the private sector. For each of these dimensions, the report draws on available information to review the general context and current situation, including key challenges and opportunities for improvement relevant to Croatia.
Link to Data Set
Citation
World Bank. 2025. Croatia - Management of Earthquake Risk. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43816 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.
Associated URLs
Associated content
Report Series
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Citations

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Publication
    Natural Disaster Risk Management in the Philippines : Enhancing Poverty Alleviation Through Disaster Reduction
    (Washington, DC, 2005-10) World Bank
    The Philippines by virtue of its geographic circumstances is highly prone to natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tropical cyclones and floods, making it one of the most disaster prone countries in the world. This report seeks to document the impacts of natural disasters on the social and economic development of the Philippines; assess the country's current capacity to reduce and manage disaster risk; and identify options for more effective management of that risk. The Philippine institutional arrangements and disaster management systems tend to rely on a response, or reactive approach, in contrast to a more effective proactive approach, in which disasters are avoided, by appropriate land-use planning, construction and other pre-event measures which avoid the creation of disaster-prone conditions. To evolve to a more proactive role, it is important that a national framework for comprehensive disaster risk management be prepared and implemented. The framework should incorporate the essential steps of integrated risk management, which include risk identification, risk reduction, and risk sharing/financing. The study identified some specific areas under these key themes that would need to be addressed to improve the current system, discussed through the study. The study also found that currently, the Government and individual households bear the majority of costs caused by natural disasters. More effective options for financing disaster risk, and relieving the burden of disasters from the public sector should be explored, including the idea of a catastrophe insurance pool, and/or contingent credit facilities. Also found was that, despite the high hazard risk in the Philippines, the insurance coverage for residential dwellings' catastrophes is almost non-existent. It is stipulated the Bank should examine the ongoing portfolio to identify how its projects can support the goal of disaster risk reduction. In addition, the Bank should consider more direct support to the development of an integrated disaster management risk approach, through the provision of technical assistance and lending.
  • Publication
    GDLN Seminar on Strengthening Disaster Risk Management in East Asia and the Pacific : Volume 1 . Post‐disaster recovery procedures of the Great Hanshin (Kobe earthquake) earthquake and the Great Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake
    (Washington, DC, 2008-12) World Bank
    In the GLDN seminar, the recovery procedures in the aftermath of the Kobe earthquake and the Asian tsunami were discussed. This introduction to Catastrophe Risk Financing Frameworks seminar provided participants with an understanding of catastrophe risk financing frameworks. In addition, it informed participants of new product lines in risk mitigation and risk finance and transfer and shared experiences of Bank-financed projects, including Turkey's Catastrophic Insurance Pool.
  • Publication
    The Great East Japan Earthquake--Learning from Megadisasters : Knowledge Notes, Executive Summary
    (Washington, DC, 2012) World Bank
    The Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE) was the first disaster ever recorded that included an earthquake, a tsunami, a nuclear power plant accident, a power supply failure, and a large-scale disruption of supply chains. On March 11, 2011 earthquake of magnitude 9.0 occurred in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Japan's Tohoku region. The quake shook the ground as far away as western Japan and lasted for several minutes. A half hour later, a tsunami of unprecedented force broke over 650 kilometers of coastline, toppling sea walls and other defenses, flooding more than 500 km of land, and washing away entire towns and villages. This learning from Megadisasters, a knowledge sharing project is sponsored by the Government of Japan and the World Bank. The successes of Japan's Disaster Risk Management (DRM) system, as well as the ways in which that system could be improved, are reflected in the lessons drawn from the GEJE and presented in the initial reports from the Learning from megadisasters project: extreme disasters underscore the need for a holistic approach to DRM, preventive Investments pay, but be prepared for the unexpected, learning from disaster is key, as Japan has shown for the past 2,000 years, DRM is everyone's business, assessing risks and communicating them clearly and widely helps citizens make timely decisions to protect themselves, hazard maps can give the public a false sense of safety, if not properly communicated, Better management of information and communication is crucial in emergencies and recovery operations, coordination mechanisms must be developed and tested in normal times, so that they are ready for use in an emergency, and vulnerable groups must be protected and engaged.
  • Publication
    Earthquake Recovery and Revitalization in Sisak-Moslavina County
    (Washington, DC, 2022-07) World Bank
    In March and December 2020, Croatia was hit by series of earthquakes that caused substantial damage and losses to people, infrastructure, and the economy. In the aftermath, the World Bank supported the government of Croatia with technical assistance and funding, including analytics that focused on local government recovery and the revitalization of Sisak-Moslavina County, where the effects of the December earthquakes were severe. These analytics are reflected in two technical notes Rapid Damage and Needs assessment for the cities of Sisak, Petrinja, and Glina – December 2020 Earthquake and Municipal Finance Assessment (both concluded in 2022). This policy brief presents the summary findings and policy recommendations produced in these two notes. The customized information and recommendations generated by the analytics can guide the ongoing recovery and reconstruction process of the local and regional authorities in Sisak-Moslavina County and inform the financial management and governance decisions of authorities at the central level.
  • Publication
    India Earthquake 8th October 2005, Jammu and Kashmir : Preliminary Damage and Needs Assessment
    (New Delhi, 2006-01-16) Asian Development Bank; United Nations; World Bank
    This report provides an assessment of damages and needs resulting from the earthquake that struck India on the 8m of October 2005. It provides a preliminary estimate of the total cost of damage identifies the needs for reconstruction and discusses strategies and guiding principles for the implementation for a program of reconstruction, the whole based on a need to mitigate future impact of natural disasters through the strengthening of disaster risk management. The report was prepared in response to the Government of India (Department of Economic Affairs) and was undertaken by the United Nations, World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. A team of experts drawn from the three institutions visited the worst affected areas of Jammu and Kashmir to undertake the assessment. The assessment mission comprised experts and specialists drawn from all relevant disciplines so as to be able to prepare a multi-sectoral report of damage, loss, recovery and reconstruction options, as comprehensive as possible given the very limited amount of time able to conduct field visits. The assessment team expresses its appreciation to all authorities for their support and assistance in terms of access to information and availability for discussion. Particular thanks are expressed to the Divisional Commissioner and his team for facilitating logistics and security during our stay in Srinagar and for transportation to the affected areas, as well as to District Commissioners and their teams at a local level for providing information and support during the visits themselves. The findings of the assessment, conducted between December 15th and 2200 are presented in this report. They analysis of the team is based on discussions with all relevant authorities and the limited visits to the worst-affected areas as well as analysis of figures provided by authorities on key pre-earthquake data. Given that not all information is even to date available to the assessment team members, and the limited amount of time present in the affected areas themselves, the figures for damage and needs are to be considered as the best estimate possible.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.