Publication:
Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?

dc.contributor.authorChen, Maggie Xiaoyang
dc.contributor.authorMattoo, Aaditya
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-30T07:33:12Z
dc.date.available2012-03-30T07:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractRegional agreements on standards have been largely ignored by economists and blessed by multilateral trade rules. Using a constructed panel data that identifies the different types of agreements at the industry level, we find that such agreements increase the trade between participating countries but not necessarily with the rest of the world. Harmonization of standards may reduce the exports of excluded countries, especially in markets that have raised the stringency of standards. Mutual recognition agreements are more uniformly trade promoting unless they contain restrictive rules of origin, in which case intra-regional trade increases at the expense of imports from other countries.en
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Journal of Economics
dc.identifier.issn00084085
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/5515
dc.language.isoEN
dc.relation.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo
dc.rights.holderWorld Bank
dc.subjectTrade Policy
dc.subjectInternational Trade Organizations F130
dc.subjectCountry and Industry Studies of Trade F140
dc.subjectInternational Linkages to Development
dc.subjectRole of International Organizations O190
dc.titleRegionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?en
dc.title.alternativeCanadian Journal of Economicsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeArticle de journalfr
dc.typeArtículo de revistaes
dspace.entity.typePublication
okr.doctypeJournal Article
okr.externalcontentExternal Content
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum401
okr.journal.nbpages838-863
okr.language.supporteden
okr.peerreviewAcademic Peer Review
okr.relation.associatedurlhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=0994943&site=ehost-live
okr.relation.associatedurlhttp://economics.ca/cje/
okr.volume41
Files