Publication: Laying the Foundations for a Sustainable Blue Economy in Ecuador: Assessing the Conservation Priorities and Gaps in the Territorial Sea of Ecuador to Support Marine Spatial Planning and Maximize the Blue Economy
Loading...
Date
2025-06-20
ISSN
Published
2025-06-20
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This report aims to support Ecuador in identifying priority marine and coastal areas for conservation within its territorial sea, considering its strategic goals as described in its 2015–2030 National Biodiversity Strategy and its commitment to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework’s “30 x 30 target” of 30 percent of land and marine areas conserved by 2030. The report also offers recommendations and actions that can be taken in the short, middle, and long term to achieve these recommendations.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. Laying the Foundations for a Sustainable Blue Economy in Ecuador: Assessing the Conservation Priorities and Gaps in the Territorial Sea of Ecuador to Support Marine Spatial Planning and Maximize the Blue Economy. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43360 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Senegal : Country Environmental Analysis(Washington, DC, 2008-11-12)The main objective of the Senegal Country Environmental Analysis (CEA) is to reinforce the ongoing dialogue on environmental issues between the World Bank and the Government of Senegal. The CEA also aims to support the ongoing Government implementation of a strategic results-based planning process at the Environment Ministry (MEPNBRLA). The main goal is to enable Senegal to have the necessary tools to attain the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and manage its natural resources and environment in a sustainable manner that contributes sharing wealth and reducing poverty. The CEA presents a review of national environmental priorities and the institutional framework for managing these priorities. The CEA also proposes recommendations about reforms that could be implemented with the support of international development partners. This final CEA report includes three sections to encourage discussion on the observations made from the analysis and the suggested recommendations: a) section one summarizes the main environmental issues identified in the CEA (institutional framework for environmental management, sustainable management of terrestrial ecosystems, management of water resources, management of fisheries, and urban environmental management in Dakar. Other environmental issues are also tackled in this section, urban environmental management in regions, waste management, management of coastal zones, and management of retention basins and artificial lakes; b) section two analyzes each of the issues and singles out specific observations and recommendations about institutional and legal reforms and ways to improve management; and c) section three summarizes the operational recommendations drawn from the previous section according to the main environmental issues identified in the CEA framework.Publication Indispensable Ocean : Aligning Ocean Health and Human Well-Being(Global Partnership for Oceans, Washington, DC, 2013-10-16)A healthy ocean is fundamental to human wellbeing and an indispensable part of the Earth's life-support system, which sustains the species and the ecosystems upon which we depend. The ocean regulates our climate and, as part of the hydrological cycle, drives weather patterns that determine rainfall, droughts, and floods. The ocean has also reduced the impact of human-induced climate change by absorbing 25 percent of the carbon dioxide released by human activities and over 90 percent of the extra heat trapped by rising concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases. The ocean also provides food and sustains livelihoods. The size and growth of the human population is putting unprecedented pressure on natural resources, both on land and in the sea. The ocean may play an increasing role in supplying those resources and will, in this regard, play a critical role in global efforts to reduce poverty and improve livelihoods. Comprehensive global estimates of the economic activity associated with the ocean have only recently been attempted and a published consensus estimate has not yet emerged. The global economic benefits derived from the ocean's goods and services are, however, undeniably important, especially for coastal states and island nations. The ocean generates hundreds of millions of jobs in biotechnology, energy, fishing, shipping, tourism, and other sectors. Most current economic assessments do not yet fully account for the innumerable non-market ecosystem services that can deeply influence well-being, traditions, cultures, faith, and recreation and enjoyment for many millions of people.Publication Expanding Financing for Biodiversity Conservation : Experiences from Latin America and the Caribbean(Washington, DC, 2013-01)The Latin America and Caribbean Region has been at the forefront of global biodiversity conservation, dedicating 20 percent of its land to protected areas compared to 13 percent in the rest of the developing world. This progress has stretched available budgets for conservation with estimates indicating that a twofold increase would be necessary to achieve optimal management of existing protected areas based on 2008 data. Recognizing the importance of this financing challenge, this document presents examples of how the region is successfully exploring news ways and sources of finance for biodiversity conservation. It is intended as an input to the global discussions on biodiversity financing drawing from a selective review of concrete experiences where governments are tapping nonpublic finance sources in effective partnerships. The cases reviewed point to common features contributing to their success: (i) variety in arrangements; (ii) enabling legal and institutional support; (iii) capacity based on record of experience; (iv) building social capital; (v) clarity about conservation objectives; (vi) strong government leadership in guiding biodiversity conservation policies and programs.Publication Natural Resources Governance : Way Forward Action Plan(Washington, DC, 2005-06)A 2003 World Bank study, "Governance of Natural Resources in the Philippines," analyzed natural resources management and governance in the Philippines. It assessed sector policies, particularly property rights, institutions, and financing mechanisms as well as program implementation. The study concluded that implementation failures in the Department arose from: (a) Unclear institutional mandates between national and local governments; (b) Lack of sustained financing at the national level and limited generation of revenues at the local level for natural resources management; (c) Protracted procedures in the issuance of forestry tenure instruments and difficulties in the enforcement of provisions of agreements; (d) Lack of equivalent tenure instruments for coastal waters and resources; (e) Administrative constraints, such as inadequate funds and personnel to carry out sustainable natural resources management; and, (f) Insufficient capacity, accountability and transparency in public and private institutions responsible for natural resources management. Because the Governance study stopped short of proposing a way forward, this follow-on activity was designed to develop an actionable follow-on plan that could be translated into short-term to medium-term investments. This follow-on study had the following specific objectives: (a) A Policy Review of the various legislations, such as acts and executive orders that govern the management of resources; and (b) An Institutional Environment Review. Activities to promote integrated community-based watershed management would focus on developing management plans for the major watersheds; strengthening institutional arrangements; providing incentives for good governance; generating adequate funding for river basin management; reclassifying forestlands and taking into account the rights of indigenous people; developing a land use policy and preparing land use mapping; and consolidating all databases and lessons learned. Activities are also proposed to fully develop integrated coastal zones management and to promote community-based protected area management.Publication Putting Tanzania's Hidden Economy to Work : Reform, Management, and Protection of its Natural Resource Sector(Washington, DC : World Bank, 2008)This paper tells a story about conditions in Tanzania's hidden economy, the parts of the natural resource sector often ignored in conventional economic analyses and studies, and makes recommendations for future policy actions. The paper draws primarily from extensive background studies undertaken of the forestry, fishery, wildlife, mining, and tourism sub sectors (COWI 2005) as well as a wide range of complementary studies undertaken by the World Bank and others. It de-emphasizes those sectors with factors of production that are not readily traded or exported (such as land and water), although some examples are given relating to soil quality and water management based on extensive studies undertaken within the agriculture and water sectors. The story is relatively simple: pricing distortions, coupled with institutional weakness and the lack of rule of law, have created an environment that undermines economic growth. This paper also acknowledges that Tanzania has already taken positive steps to making some of the needed corrections to protect its natural resources. In recent analyses of corruption indicators world-wide (World Bank Institute 2006), Tanzanian stands out among those nations as having made significant progress towards improving accountability and reducing economic leakages. Anti-corruption legislation was drafted for parliament attention in early 2007. Revisions to the Deep Sea Fishing Authority Act were passed into law in early 2007. Moreover, changes in institutional arrangements, taxation, and general management of the resource sector show promise and have contributed positively to general economic growth. Yet, the sector remains fragile and vulnerable in other respects: perceptions of unequal income distribution, impacts of climate change, and other external influences must also be addressed to build on past successes.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Technical Guidance Note on Enhancing Data and Systems Interoperability for Carbon Markets: Current Landscape and Strategic Recommendations(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-06)The "Technical Guidance Note on Enhancing Data and Systems Interoperability for Carbon Markets: Current Landscape and Strategic Recommendations" is one of five guidance notes prepared by the Carbon Markets Infrastructure Working Group (CMI WG). This note aims to inform ongoing efforts to improve data interoperability across carbon market systems—enabling consistent, transparent exchange of data between registries, programs, and jurisdictions. It outlines key challenges such as data fragmentation and inconsistent reporting; offers a stocktake of global initiatives to standardize carbon credit data; and provides targeted recommendations for aligning registry systems and data practices. Designed for modular adoption, the note aims to help stakeholders enhance comparability, support Article 6 implementation, and build connected, interoperable carbon markets infrastructure.Publication June 2025 Update to the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP)(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-11)The June 2025 update to the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) introduces several important changes to the data underlying the global poverty estimates. The most important change is the adoption of the 2021 Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs). In addition, new data for India has been incorporated and the existing series adjusted for comparability. This document details the changes to underlying data and the methodological reasons behind them. Depending on the availability of recent survey data, global and regional poverty estimates are reported up to 2023, together with nowcasts up to 2025. The PIP database now includes 74 new country-years, bringing the total number of surveys to over 2,400, for 172 economies.Publication Viet Nam 2045 - Breaking Through(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-05-22)While Viet Nam’s institutions may not have the forms that exist in other countries, it is the functions of institutions, rather than specific forms, that are important. This study adopts a framework based on the functions of institutions in the quest to support an evolving role of the state: market-creating, market-stabilizing, market-regulating, market-complementing, and market-legitimizing institutions, as well as the institutions for a capable and accountable state. Part I of this study will first survey the landscape of institutions in Viet Nam according to this framework. Some institutions may be essential for growth in the long term, but do not seem to be binding constraints to Viet Nam’s growth. Others are more foundational and will be the subject of deeper dives in Parts II and III of this report: those for a growth-supporting state (market-complementing and market-regulating) and those for the state’s capability to deliver with efficiency and accountability. This emphasis is also consistent with the experience of countries that escaped the middle-income trap—many of which did so by improving the predictability of the implementation of laws, by boosting quality and quantity of public investment, and by improving the quality and motivation of their public administration.Publication Transforming Economic Inclusion(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-11)Adoption of economic inclusion programs (bundles of coordinated, multidimensional interventions that support individuals, households, and communities to sustainably increase their incomes and assets) is expanding rapidly, with a global increase of more than 50 percent in the reach of such programs since 2021. By 2024, these programs were supporting over 15 million households, benefiting more than 70 million people directly and indirectly . Governments are increasingly leading these scale-up efforts. About 43 percent of 405 surveyed programs are government led, accounting for about 74 percent of all participants. Economic inclusion initiatives must be highly adaptable and tailored to the contexts of regions and communities; innovation and strong accountability mechanisms can ensure that programs are implemented effectively and resources used efficiently. Outcomes-based financing (OBF) is an approach to results-based funding in which payments are at least partially linked to the achievement of outcomes. It can potentially transform government-led economic inclusion programs by aligning stakeholder interests with the interests of the communities the programs are meant to serve and creating space and incentive for innovation. By shifting the focus from what goes into a program to what comes out of it, OBF can offer a more strategic and results-driven approach to program implementation. This paper draws on global experience with OBF and defines OBF and its principles; provides an overview of the OBF landscape; presents case studies of OBF projects in Colombia, India, and East Africa; and examines the contextual challenges to consider when determining whether OBF is the right approach for government-led programs. Finally, the authors offer practical guidance on addressing the risks and challenges, suggests strategies for scaling outcomes-based finance initiatives, and identifies the research gaps.Publication Making Refugee Self-Reliance Work: From Aid to Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-09)"Making Refugee Self-Reliance Work: From Aid to Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa" advocates for the enhancement of refugee self-reliance as a strategic, humane, development approach to refugee assistance. Facilitating refugees’ capacity to support themselves through gainful work not only upholds their dignity and autonomy but also offers socioeconomic benefits to host communities by unlocking opportunities for shared investment and development. The report demonstrates how refugee self-reliance in Sub-Saharan Africa remains elusive and identifies various reasons why this is the case: encampment limits the scope for self-reliance; restrictions on refugees’ right to work hinder self-sufficiency; small allocations of infertile land make even subsistence farming impossible; aid delivery in specific areas contributes to settlement patterns in which skills and economic opportunities do not match; economic development in remote, resource-scarce regions is unsustainable; and dependence on aid shifts funding priorities from long-term development to unproductive care and maintenance models. To overcome these challenges, the report outlines five areas for policy action: 1. Ending restrictive encampment policies 2. Boosting refugees’ economic participation 3. Supporting host communities 4. Reshaping financing and investment models 5. Investing in preparedness. Success requires committed leadership from host governments, as well as coordinated engagement and sustained support from humanitarian organizations and development partners.