Publication: Cases in Outcome Harvesting : Ten Pilot Experiences Identify New Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Projects to Improve Results
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-09T21:07:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-09T21:07:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-06 | |
dc.description.abstract | The harvesting process is stakeholder-centered and captures qualitative, tacit knowledge. It includes tools to substantiate and analyze this knowledge collaboratively and communicate progress toward impact to clients, management, and partners. The tools are flexible to adapt to a program's design and can provide useful details to inform the theory of change, implementation lessons, outcomes, and indicators. This report documents a stage one pilot to identify how outcome harvesting can be integrated with the World Bank's results management approach, for learning during a program s implementation and review stages. Specifically, the pilots examined how outcome harvesting tools can lend one to learning about how change happens in complex aspects of programs. For instance, what combination of interventions worked to advance particular changes, what behavioral and institutional changes were advanced, and what was the right mix of social actors involved to achieve results? The initial pilots used outcome harvesting to review progress for 10 ongoing knowledge initiatives supporting World Bank programs or projects in strategic thematic areas. The teams retrospectively harvested information from about 2 to 5 years of program results. The analysis of each initiative s achievements included an outcome map to visualize the changes by timeline and actor and a change strategy map that summarized the outcome information to communicate the theory of change and results chain. Outcome harvesting tools can be used to gather evidence on key interventions and identify essential lessons, such as how best to adapt successful efforts to different contexts and how to choose the best mix of actors to involve. Teams recommended that precise learning can be used for informing program design and delivery, as well as defined areas for further operational research and evaluation. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/06/20148536/cases-outcome-harvesting-ten-pilot-experiences-identify-new-learning-multi-stakeholder-projects-improve-results | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/20015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/20015 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Washington, DC | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | ACCOUNTABILITY | |
dc.subject | ACTION PLANS | |
dc.subject | ADAPTIVE LEARNING | |
dc.subject | ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS | |
dc.subject | ANTI-CORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | ANTICORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | AUTHORITY | |
dc.subject | AUTHORIZATION | |
dc.subject | BEHAVIORS | |
dc.subject | BEST PRACTICES | |
dc.subject | BOUNDARIES | |
dc.subject | BRIBES | |
dc.subject | BUDGET DEFICITS | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS CLIMATE | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS INDICATOR | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS INDICATORS | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS MODEL | |
dc.subject | BUSINESSES | |
dc.subject | CAPACITY BUILDING | |
dc.subject | CENTRAL GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | CHANGE AGENT | |
dc.subject | CHANGE AGENTS | |
dc.subject | CHANGE MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | CHANGE PROCESS | |
dc.subject | CITIZENS | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SERVANTS | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS | |
dc.subject | COLLABORATION | |
dc.subject | COMMERCE | |
dc.subject | COMMON SENSE | |
dc.subject | COMMUNITY MEMBERS | |
dc.subject | COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE | |
dc.subject | COMPLEXITY | |
dc.subject | CONNECTIVITY | |
dc.subject | CONSENSUS | |
dc.subject | CONSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | COORDINATION MECHANISM | |
dc.subject | COPYRIGHT | |
dc.subject | CORRUPT | |
dc.subject | CORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | CURRICULUM | |
dc.subject | CUSTOMER SATISFACTION | |
dc.subject | DECISION-MAKING | |
dc.subject | DECREE | |
dc.subject | DISCUSSION | |
dc.subject | DISCUSSIONS | |
dc.subject | DOCUMENTS | |
dc.subject | E-LEARNING | |
dc.subject | EDUCATION SECTOR | |
dc.subject | EDUCATION SERVICES | |
dc.subject | ELEARNING | |
dc.subject | ELECTED OFFICIALS | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICITY | |
dc.subject | EQUIPMENT | |
dc.subject | EXPERIMENTATION | |
dc.subject | EXTERNAL CONSULTANT | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL RESOURCES | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL VIABILITY | |
dc.subject | FOCUS GROUPS | |
dc.subject | FOREIGN INVESTMENT | |
dc.subject | GOOD GOVERNANCE | |
dc.subject | GOVERNANCE REFORM | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT ACTION | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT LEVEL | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT OFFICES | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT PROGRAM | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT REVENUES | |
dc.subject | HUMAN CAPACITY | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RESOURCES | |
dc.subject | IDEA | |
dc.subject | IDEAS | |
dc.subject | IMAGE | |
dc.subject | IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SHARING | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | INITIATIVE | |
dc.subject | INNOVATIONS | |
dc.subject | INSPECTION | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTIONALIZATION | |
dc.subject | INTEGRATION | |
dc.subject | INTERVENTIONS | |
dc.subject | INTRANET | |
dc.subject | KNOWLEDGE CAPTURE | |
dc.subject | KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | KNOWLEDGE SHARING | |
dc.subject | LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY | |
dc.subject | LEADERSHIP | |
dc.subject | LEARNING | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATION | |
dc.subject | LEGITIMACY | |
dc.subject | LOCAL GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | LOCAL GOVERNMENTS | |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT SERVICE | |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT SERVICES | |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | MINISTER | |
dc.subject | MINISTERS | |
dc.subject | MINISTRIES OF AGRICULTURE | |
dc.subject | MINISTRIES OF HEALTH | |
dc.subject | MUNICIPALITY | |
dc.subject | NATIONAL TRAINING | |
dc.subject | OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCES | |
dc.subject | PERSONAL MASTERY | |
dc.subject | POLICE | |
dc.subject | POLICY FRAMEWORK | |
dc.subject | POLITICAL LEADERS | |
dc.subject | PRACTITIONERS | |
dc.subject | PRESIDENCY | |
dc.subject | PRESIDENTS | |
dc.subject | PRIMARY EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | PROBLEM SOLVING | |
dc.subject | PROCUREMENT | |
dc.subject | PROJECT MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | PROVINCIAL EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC FINANCE | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SCHOOLS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SECTOR | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SERVICE | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SPENDING | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC UTILITY | |
dc.subject | QUALITY OF SERVICE | |
dc.subject | QUALITY OF SERVICES | |
dc.subject | REGIONAL NETWORK | |
dc.subject | REPRESENTATIVES | |
dc.subject | RESULT | |
dc.subject | RESULTS | |
dc.subject | RURAL AREAS | |
dc.subject | SERVICE DELIVERY | |
dc.subject | SERVICES TO CITIZENS | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL NORMS | |
dc.subject | SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | SUPERVISION | |
dc.subject | SUPPLY CHAIN | |
dc.subject | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | TACIT KNOWLEDGE | |
dc.subject | TEACHERS | |
dc.subject | TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE | |
dc.subject | TECHNICAL EXPERTISE | |
dc.subject | TECHNICAL EXPERTS | |
dc.subject | TECHNICAL SUPPORT | |
dc.subject | TEXTBOOKS | |
dc.subject | THINKING | |
dc.subject | TIME PERIOD | |
dc.subject | TRAINING MATERIALS | |
dc.subject | TRANSMISSION | |
dc.subject | TRANSPARENCY | |
dc.subject | UNIVERSAL PRIMARY EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | USE OF KNOWLEDGE | |
dc.subject | USES | |
dc.subject | VARIETY | |
dc.subject | WORK PROCESSES | |
dc.title | Cases in Outcome Harvesting : Ten Pilot Experiences Identify New Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Projects to Improve Results | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2014-08-27 | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-05-05T12:33:47.219390Z | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/06/20148536/cases-outcome-harvesting-ten-pilot-experiences-identify-new-learning-multi-stakeholder-projects-improve-results | |
okr.globalpractice | Education | |
okr.globalpractice | Governance | |
okr.globalpractice | Transport and ICT | |
okr.globalpractice | Trade and Competitiveness | |
okr.guid | 419021468330946583 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000442464_20140827131715 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 20148536 | |
okr.identifier.report | 90172 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/08/27/000442464_20140827131715/Rendered/PDF/901720WP0Box380n0Outcome0Harvesting.pdf | en |
okr.topic | Education::Knowledge for Development | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures | |
okr.topic | Education::Primary Education | |
okr.topic | Private Sector Development::E-Business | |
okr.topic | Governance::National Governance | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Development | |
okr.unit | Global Practice on Health, Nutrition, and Population (GHNDR) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1