Publication: China : Air Pollution and Acid Rain Control - The Case of Shijiazhuang and the Changsha Triangle Area
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-25T20:10:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-25T20:10:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study, and the associated technical assistance project, has three main objectives. The first is to help localities in China address several questions related to the planning, and implementation of SO2 emissions, and acid rain control: What are the environmental consequences, specifically for localities of different pollution control strategies, in terms of the impacts on human health, agricultural productivity, and other sectors and activities? What are the relative costs of different sulfur emission reduction plans? Will the proposed strategies enable localities to meet the environmental targets set by the central government? The second objective is to assist with capacity building, and training in China. to enable cities and regions to carry out environmental, and economic analyses of sulfur emission impacts, and control programs. The third objective is to provide a forum for discussion with the central government, primarily the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA), on the results of the case studies, and the implications for national policy with respect to sulfur control. This study analyzes China's national sulfur pollution control program, looking at local implementation plans, and actions for reducing sulfur emissions in two municipalities- Shijiazhuang and Changsha. The city of Shijiazhuang in Hebei Province was chosen for a case study on ambient SO2 pollution control, representing a northern Chinese city, while the tri-city region of Changsha, Zhuzhou, and Xiangtan in Hunan Province, was chosen to represent a southern area experiencing serious levels of acid rain. The clear divide between northern and southern cities and regions, indicate that emission control efforts in the north will benefit from access to significant quantities of low sulfur coal, the lack of which in the south, will significantly increase the cost of sulfur emission control. Other findings suggest that gaining a better scientific understanding of the impacts of sulfur emissions, and improving estimates of the relative benefits of different control options, are two important pieces of information for leveraging local implementation efforts. While promoting policies with multiple benefits, is an effective way of cutting sulfur pollution without reliance on regulatory policies, or institutions. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2779027/china-air-pollution-acid-rain-control-case-shijiazhuang-changsha-triangle-area | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/19650 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19650 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Washington, DC | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ABATEMENT STRATEGIES | |
dc.subject | ACID DEPOSITION | |
dc.subject | ACID RAIN | |
dc.subject | ACIDIFICATION | |
dc.subject | ACIDS | |
dc.subject | AGGRAVATION OF ASTHMA | |
dc.subject | AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION | |
dc.subject | AIR | |
dc.subject | AIR POLLUTION | |
dc.subject | AIR POLLUTION CONTROL | |
dc.subject | AIR POLLUTION PROBLEMS | |
dc.subject | AIR QUALITY | |
dc.subject | AIR QUALITY PROBLEMS | |
dc.subject | AIR QUALITY STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT AIR | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT AIR POLLUTION | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT AIR QUALITY | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT CONCENTRATION | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS | |
dc.subject | AMBIENT POLLUTION | |
dc.subject | ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION | |
dc.subject | BED COMBUSTION | |
dc.subject | BENEFIT ANALYSIS | |
dc.subject | CARBON | |
dc.subject | CARBON MONOXIDE | |
dc.subject | CLEANER FUELS | |
dc.subject | CLIMATE | |
dc.subject | CO | |
dc.subject | COAL | |
dc.subject | COAL BURNING | |
dc.subject | COAL CONSUMPTION | |
dc.subject | COMBUSTION | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL ENERGY | |
dc.subject | COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS | |
dc.subject | CONCENTRATIONS | |
dc.subject | COSTS OF COMPLIANCE | |
dc.subject | DECISION MAKING | |
dc.subject | DESULFURIZATION | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIES OF SCALE | |
dc.subject | EFFECTIVE STRATEGY | |
dc.subject | EFFICIENT BUILDINGS | |
dc.subject | ELECTRIC POWER | |
dc.subject | ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY | |
dc.subject | ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICITY | |
dc.subject | EMISSION | |
dc.subject | EMISSION ABATEMENT | |
dc.subject | EMISSION CHARGES | |
dc.subject | EMISSION CONTROL | |
dc.subject | EMISSION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | |
dc.subject | EMISSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES | |
dc.subject | EMISSION ESTIMATES | |
dc.subject | EMISSION QUOTAS | |
dc.subject | EMISSION REDUCTION | |
dc.subject | EMISSION REDUCTION TARGET | |
dc.subject | EMISSION REDUCTIONS | |
dc.subject | EMISSION SOURCES | |
dc.subject | EMISSIONS ABATEMENT | |
dc.subject | ENERGY CONSUMPTION | |
dc.subject | ENERGY EFFICIENCY | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENT AGENCIES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL TARGETS | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL RESOURCES | |
dc.subject | FINE PARTICULATE MATTER | |
dc.subject | FINE PARTICULATES | |
dc.subject | FLUE GAS | |
dc.subject | FUEL | |
dc.subject | FUEL CONSUMPTION | |
dc.subject | FUEL MIX | |
dc.subject | FUEL SUBSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | FUEL SWITCHING | |
dc.subject | FUELS | |
dc.subject | GAS DESULFURIZATION | |
dc.subject | GAS TRANSMISSION | |
dc.subject | GREENHOUSE | |
dc.subject | GREENHOUSE GAS | |
dc.subject | HIGH SULFUR COAL | |
dc.subject | HUMAN HEALTH | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRIAL BOILERS | |
dc.subject | LAKES | |
dc.subject | LEACHING | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATION | |
dc.subject | LOCAL AUTHORITIES | |
dc.subject | LOW SULFUR COAL | |
dc.subject | MINES | |
dc.subject | NATURAL ENVIRONMENT | |
dc.subject | NATURAL GAS | |
dc.subject | NITRATES | |
dc.subject | NITROGEN | |
dc.subject | NITROGEN OXIDES | |
dc.subject | NOX | |
dc.subject | NUTRIENTS | |
dc.subject | PARTICULATE MATTER | |
dc.subject | PARTICULATES | |
dc.subject | PETROLEUM GAS | |
dc.subject | PH | |
dc.subject | PM10 | |
dc.subject | POINT SOURCES | |
dc.subject | POLICY DECISIONS | |
dc.subject | POLICY INSTRUMENTS | |
dc.subject | POLLUTERS | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION CONTROL | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION PREVENTION | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION PROBLEMS | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION REGULATION | |
dc.subject | POWER PLANTS | |
dc.subject | PRECIPITATION | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | RESTRICTIONS | |
dc.subject | SNOW | |
dc.subject | SO2 | |
dc.subject | SOILS | |
dc.subject | SOLID WASTE | |
dc.subject | SOX | |
dc.subject | SULFATE | |
dc.subject | SULFATE PARTICLES | |
dc.subject | SULFATES | |
dc.subject | SULFUR | |
dc.subject | SULFUR DIOXIDE | |
dc.subject | SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | SULFUR EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | SULFURIC ACID | |
dc.subject | THERMAL POWER | |
dc.subject | THERMAL POWER PLANTS | |
dc.subject | TOTAL SULFUR | |
dc.subject | TRADABLE PERMIT | |
dc.subject | TRADABLE PERMIT SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | URBAN AREAS | |
dc.subject | VOC | |
dc.subject | VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS | |
dc.title | China : Air Pollution and Acid Rain Control - The Case of Shijiazhuang and the Changsha Triangle Area | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-05-05T12:44:47.345082Z | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::ESMAP Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/10/2779027/china-air-pollution-acid-rain-control-case-shijiazhuang-changsha-triangle-area | |
okr.globalpractice | Environment and Natural Resources | |
okr.globalpractice | Energy and Extractives | |
okr.guid | 573151468770452943 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000012009_20031119145505 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 2779027 | |
okr.identifier.report | ESM267 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2003/11/19/000012009_20031119145505/Rendered/PDF/ESM2670PAPER0China0Air0Pollution.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | East Asia and Pacific | |
okr.region.country | China | |
okr.sector | Energy and mining :: General energy sector | |
okr.theme | Environment and natural resource management | |
okr.theme | Environment and natural resources management :: Pollution management and environmental health | |
okr.theme | Environment and natural resources management :: Environmental policies and institutions | |
okr.topic | Pollution Management and Control | |
okr.topic | Environment::Montreal Protocol | |
okr.topic | Energy::Energy and Environment | |
okr.topic | Transport and Environment | |
okr.topic | Environmental Economics and Policies | |
okr.unit | Energy Sectr Mngmt Assist Progrm (SEGES) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1