Publication: Effect of Moderate and Radical Rules on High-Caste Behavior and Norms in India
Loading...
Files in English
Embargoed until 2025-07-04
Embargoed until 2025-07-04
Date
2024-01-04
ISSN
0258-6770 (print)
1564-698X (online)
1564-698X (online)
Published
2024-01-04
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Development and legal researchers hypothesize that a moderate law may be more effective than a radical one in changing behavior. This study tests this hypothesis in the context of discriminatory sharing norms practiced by high-caste individuals against low-caste individuals in India. The study employs a lab-in-the-field experiment in which it influences (a) high-caste participants’ social norms of sharing money with a low-caste participant and (b) introduces either a moderate or a radical rule, that is, a rule that is closer or further away from the social norm and requires high-caste participants to share a minimum amount of their money with the low- caste participant. Breaking the rule entails incurring a small fine. This study finds that the effectiveness of the moderate versus radical rule in changing behavior and norms depends on the status quo social norm. This paper provides causal empirical evidence on how social norms influence laws’ effectiveness in inducing behavioral and norm change.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“Govindan, Pavithra. 2024. Effect of Moderate and Radical Rules on High-Caste Behavior and Norms in India. World Bank Economic Review. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/42008 License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
World Bank Economic Review
1564-698X
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Citations
- Cited 1 times in Scopus (view citations)
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
No results found.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.