Publication: The World Bank Group in Georgia, 2014-23: Country Program Evaluation
Loading...
Published
2025-07-30
ISSN
Date
2025-07-30
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This Country Program Evaluation assesses the performance and effectiveness of the World Bank Group’s support to Georgia in achieving the country’s development objectives. In the decade leading up to the evaluation period, Georgia pursued economic reforms to attract critical investments for becoming a regional trade and transport hub. Ambitious economic reforms went hand in hand with efforts to improve human development and strengthening social protection systems. Growing geopolitical tensions and internal political polarization have challenged Georgia’s reform progress in recent years. The Bank Group’s strategy adapted well to Georgia’s development needs and was well coordinated with other development partners. It successfully employed a range of instruments to help increase competitiveness, growth, and job creation, and effectively contributed to improved infrastructure and increased trade by using programmatic and innovative approaches. The Bank Group’s regular investments in analytical work and the switch to results-based programmatic support helped improve the efficiency and effectiveness of education and health care systems. The IEG offers the following lessons based on the evidence and analysis in the Country Program Evaluation: (i) Prioritizing Bank Group support around the move towards deeper regional integration was an effective anchor for key economic reforms for economic convergence. (ii) Pursuing a selective and adaptive approach in a country with high implementation capacity and institutions, strong coordination among development partners, and access to a wide range of external resources can allow the Bank Group to exercise significant influence in areas of comparative advantage and global expertise. (iii) A stronger focus on outcome-based programmatic approaches helped to build local capacity and crowd-in partner financing.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. The World Bank Group in Georgia, 2014-23: Country Program Evaluation. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43524 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Digital Object Identifier
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Improving Effectiveness and Outcomes for the Poor in Health, Nutrition, and Population : An Evaluation of World Bank Group Support since 1997(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009)This evaluation aims to inform the implementation of the most recent the World Bank and International Finance Corporation (IFC) health, nutrition, and population (HNP) strategies to enhance the effectiveness of future support. It covers the period since fiscal year 1997 and is based on desk reviews of the portfolio, background studies, and field visits. The evaluation of the HNP support of the World Bank focuses on the effectiveness of policy dialogue, analytic work, and lending at the country level, while that of IFC focuses on the performance of health investments and advisory services before and after its 2002 health strategy. The themes it covers are drawn from the two strategies and the approaches adopted by international donors in the past decade. Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) has previously evaluated several aspects of the Bank's HNP support. IFC's support for the health sector has never been fully evaluated. Many lessons have been learned over the past decade about the successes and pitfalls of support for health reform: First, the failure to assess fully the political economy of reform and to prepare a proactive plan to address it can considerably diminish prospects for success. Political risks, the interests of key stakeholders, and the risk of complexity- issues the evaluation case studies found to be critical are often neglected in risk analysis in project appraisal documents for health reform projects. Second, reforms based on careful prior analytic work hold a greater chance of success, but analytic work does not ensure success. Third, the sequencing of reforms can improve political feasibility, reduce complexity, ensure that adequate capacity is in place, and facilitate learning. When implementation is flagging, the Bank can help preserve reform momentum with complementary programmatic lending through the Ministry of Finance, as it did in Peru and the Kyrgyz Republic. Finally, monitoring and evaluation are critical in health reform projects-to demonstrate the impact of pilot reforms to garner political support, but also because many reforms cannot work without a well-functioning management information system.Publication The World Bank Annual Report 2001 :Volume 1. Year in Review(Washington, DC, 2001)This Annual Report covers the period from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2001, and details the World Bank strategy for meeting the poverty challenge. After the Introduction, Chapter 1 provides an overview of Bank activities in 2001 that focused on multi-dimensional support, improved development effectiveness, increased funding volume, formalized the country business model, evolved country assistance strategies by preparing them in consultation, developed investment vehicles to support low-income countries, created a task force to consider the response to the needs of middle-income countries, developed an innovative IBRD and IDA program and project lending to support strong national programs, assessment of the Strategic Compact, the use of the World Bank Institute to empower through knowledge and setting out a strategic framework for future directions. Chapter 2 describes the role of the Board of Executive Directors. Chapter 3 examines the thematic issues the Bank is tackling, such as addressing the social, institutional, and economic dimensions of poverty; investing in people; supporting private sector development; building strong financial systems; and building effective legal and judicial systems. Chapter 4 discusses the Bank's role in fighting poverty and aiding development region by region. Chapter 5 looks at Bank project performance. Chapter 6 focuses on Bank partnerships, Chapter 7 sums up approved projects, and Chapter 8 provides organizational information. This report is in 2 volumes. Volume 2 comprises the complete Management's Discussion and Analysis, audited financial statements, and appendices.Publication Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement in World Bank Group Operations(Washington, DC, 2014)The objective of this strategic framework is to mainstream citizen engagement in World Bank Group (WBG)-supported policies, programs, projects, and advisory services and analytics to improve their development results and within the scope of these operations, contribute to building sustainable national systems for citizen engagement with governments and the private sector. This framework will capture the diverse experiences, assess lessons learned, and outline methods and entry points to provide a more systematic and results-focused approach for the WBG. Progress toward this objective will be assessed using indicators included in program, project, and corporate results frameworks. The WBG strategy incorporates citizen engagement, including beneficiary feedback, specifically in its treatment of inclusion, which entails empowering citizens to participate in the development process and integrating citizen voice in development programs as key accelerators to achieving results. This framework builds on stocktaking and lessons learned from WBG-financed operations across regions and sectors. A key lesson is the importance of country context, government ownership, and clear objectives for citizen engagement. The approach to mainstreaming citizen engagement in WBG-supported operations is guided by five principles: 1) it is results-focused; 2) it involves engaging throughout the operational cycle; 3) it seeks to strengthen country systems; 4) it is context-specific; and 5) it is gradual. Under the right circumstances, citizen engagement can contribute to achieving development outcomes in support of the goals the WBG aims to support through all of the operations it funds: eradicating extreme poverty and boosting shared prosperity in a sustainable manner.Publication A Guide to the World Bank(Washington, DC, 2003)This book is intended for the wide range of people around the world who need basic information about the work of the Bank Group. This audience includes people working in all aspects of development, students, members of the general public, and staff members of the Bank Group itself. Because this audience is so broad, the text emphasizes the organizational and conceptual divisions of the Bank Group's activities and guides readers to potential sources of more-detailed explanations of the development work in progress. The annual reports of the Bank Group institutions provide more details on the volume and types of development assistance. The annual World Bank Group Directory lists telephone contacts for individuals and departments. The following chapters explain how the World Bank Group is organized; how it operates; and how its work focuses on countries, regions, and specific topics in development. Appendixes provide further information on Bank Group contacts, on the organization's history, on country membership and the voting shares in the institutions, on the sector and thematic categories for the Bank Group's activities, and on Bank Group resources in individual countries.Publication World Bank Group Support to Health Financing(World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2014-07)The way countries finance health care influences how well a health system performs and achieves its expected outcomes, including how equitable and efficient it is. Countries decide how to mobilize revenues from different sources for financing health care, how to pool revenues in public and private insurance and in a national health system with automatic coverage (risk pooling), and how to purchase care from health care providers. The World Bank has implemented health financing activities in 68 countries during FY03-12. Health financing interventions are found in about 40 percent of the Bank s Health, Nutrition, and Population portfolio. Most projects include interventions on revenue collection from public sources. Almost half of the projects support public health insurance and automatic coverage. More recently, results-based financing (RBF) operations became more prominent. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) delivered a small program in health financing. The evaluation makes five main recommendations: support government commitment and build technical and information capacity; address health financing as a cross-cutting issue at the country level; focus on health financing as a core comparative advantage; integrate all health financing functions; and strengthen monitoring and evaluation in Bank and IFC projects.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication FY 2025 China Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-08-04)The Country Opinion Survey in China assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in better understanding how stakeholders in China perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in China on 1) their views regarding the general environment in China; 2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in China; 3) overall impressions of the WBG’s effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in China; and 4) their perceptions of the WBG’s future role in China.Publication Forecast Sensitivity to Global Risks(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-05-29)Developing countries face uncertainties driven by global macroeconomic variables over which they have little to no control. Key exogenous factors faced by most developing countries include interest rates in high-income countries, commodity prices, global demand for exports, and remit- tance inflows. While these variables are sensitive to common global shocks, they also exhibit idiosyncratic fluctuations. This paper employs a Bayesian Vector Autoregression model to capture interdependencies of global variables and simulates global risks using the empirical joint distribution of global shock as captured by joint Bayesian Vector Autoregression errors. The simulated shocks are then integrated into the World Bank’s macro-structural model to assess how a range of potential global disturbances could impact economic outcomes across countries. The methodology is applied to 115 countries, using the World Bank’s fall 2024 edition of the Macro-Poverty Outlook forecasts as a baseline. Although the individual country results are heterogeneous, the aggregate distribution of gross domestic product outcomes across the 115 countries suggests that global factors influence gross domestic product levels in individual developing countries by less than plus or minus 2 percent in most years, but by between 2 and 4 percent in about 3 in 10 years.Publication The International Finance Corporation’s Investments in the Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences Sector(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-30)This clustered Project Performance Assessment Report (PPAR) chapeau report synthesizes evaluation findings from six International Finance Corporation (IFC) investment projects in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector, specifically targeting generic prescription drugs and consumer health products across five countries in three regions. The projects were selected for PPAR through purposeful sampling in consultation with IFC’s Global Health team and regional industry departments. These projects were committed during FY 2017–18 and selected based in the achievement of early operating maturity. The clustered PPAR chapeau report addresses the following topics: (i) The efficacy of IFC’s investments in improving the accessibility, quality, and affordability of critical pharmaceuticals and life sciences products. (ii) Management of environmental and social (E&S) risks in these projects and their effect on environmental and social sustainability. (iii) Key internal and external factors that enabled or constrained IFC’s effectiveness in the projects. (iv) IFC’s additionality (that is, the benefit or value addition that IFC brings that a client would not otherwise have; additionality can be financial or nonfinancial) in projects beyond financing (for example, knowledge transfer, advisory services, World Bank Group collaboration, and E&S sustainability). (v) Lessons learned and their implications, which can be applied across the pharma value chain, particularly in developing markets, to resolve supply-side constraints.Publication Preparedness for Epidemics and Pandemics(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-18)This evaluation focuses on the preparedness of the World Bank Group, including the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (IFC), to support epidemic- and pandemic-related health emergencies. A health emergency is defined as an extraordinary event that is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response. While health emergencies can include natural disasters or humanitarian crises that impact the health of populations, the evaluation centers on the preparedness—including prevention, detection, and readiness—to act quickly in health emergencies whose origins or sources are related to infectious disease outbreaks and antimicrobial resistance. Globally, the increasing risk of outbreaks and epidemics that could escalate into pandemic health emergencies underscores the need for countries to be better prepared. A strong development and economic rationale exists for investing in preparedness to reduce the risk of outbreaks and epidemics. According to the Global Health Security Index—which measures 195 countries’ preparedness and capacity to respond to epidemics and pandemics—all countries are dangerously unprepared for epidemics and pandemics, with less developed countries being particularly vulnerable because of their weak systems. The evaluation’s purpose is to assess the Bank Group’s support for epidemic preparedness, which aims to help client countries prevent, detect, and ensure readiness for infectious disease outbreaks. This evaluation will provide insights into the effectiveness of past and ongoing preparedness efforts supported by the World Bank, specifically examining what works and why. These findings can inform scale-up to enhance efforts of the World Bank’s HEPPR Global Challenge Program. The evaluation will focus on the support of the World Bank and IFC. Given that the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency has a relatively small and predominantly new portfolio in this area, it will not be included in the evaluation.Publication How the World Bank Supports Adaptive Social Protection in Crisis Response(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-07-30)Shocks and crises pose significant threats to human development, disproportionately affecting poor and vulnerable households. These shocks, whether natural disasters, economic crises, or political upheavals, often force households to resort to negative coping strategies, such as pulling children out of school, selling assets, or going hungry. To address these challenges, social protection responses need to be tailored to both immediate and long-term needs. This evaluation assesses the World Bank's support for Adaptive Social Protection (ASP) systems from 2012– 22, assessing their relevance and effectiveness in responding to shocks. During the evaluation period, the World Bank significantly contributed to the global understanding and financing of ASP systems. Its knowledge contributions were instrumental in shaping the ASP concept, while its lending has increased substantially, expanding across all regions with a focus on low-income and fragile countries. World Bank – supported social protection systems have responded to different types of shocks over the past decade. However, shock response often fell short in coverage, timeliness, and adequacy, especially for sudden-onset shocks. Key factors constraining systems’ ability to adequately address shocks include narrow data systems, lack of interoperability across systems, low political buy-in for cash transfers during shocks, and lack of financial resources. Fragmented institutional landscapes and internal World Bank silos also hindered the effective implementation of World Bank – supported ASP systems. The evaluation offers three recommendations to prepare social protection delivery systems for faster and more comprehensive coverage in response to shocks, and to measure shock response for corrective action. (i) Continue investing in system building and expanded coverage, focusing on program elements that serve both regular and shock-responsive functions. (ii) Strengthen coordination between client government SP and DRM agencies, improve partnership with humanitarian agencies, and enhance internal collaboration within the World Bank for shock response. (iii) Enhance the measurement of SP systems’ effectiveness in responding to shocks by setting performance targets, monitoring system performance with dynamic stress testing, and using the insights to guide future investments.