Publication: Reforming Justice: Increasing Access through Small Claim Courts
Loading...
Date
2024-12-09
ISSN
Published
2024-12-09
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
Small claims courts and procedures play an important role in enhancing the efficiency and accessibility of the justice system. When well-designed, they can significantly streamline judicial processes, reduce the burden on courts, and increase access to justice for individuals and small businesses. This brief presents trends in the use of such mechanisms. It systematically analyzes key components essential for designing effective small claims systems, including the court structure, the nature of the proceedings (mandatory vs. optional), monetary thresholds for claims, filing processes, fee structures, timelines, and the admissibility of evidence. The brief concludes with recommendations for jurisdictions to assess and refine their small claims systems based on empirical data and user feedback, ensuring they effectively address the barriers to justice faced by litigants.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“Bosio, Erica; Petkova, Svetozara. 2024. Reforming Justice: Increasing Access through Small Claim Courts. Prosperity Insight Series. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/42513 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Reforming Justice(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-12-09)Adequate budgeting of the judiciary is critical for the effective delivery of justice. This brief presents trends in judicial budgets. Courts account for less than 2 percent of total government expenditure on average, with significant portions dedicated to fixed costs such as salaries, thereby limiting investments in technological advancements essential for improving judicial efficiency. This brief identifies three major trends in judicial budgeting reforms: increasing autonomy for the judiciary in budget management, accountability for budget execution at the court level, and a shift toward performance-based budgeting models. These reforms aim to bolster the judiciary's operational efficiency and public perception, ultimately linking adequate judicial funding to enhanced social and economic outcomes. The findings emphasize the necessity for judicial leaders to continuously advocate for resources by demonstrating the judiciary’s integral role in maintaining law and order, promoting democracy, and fostering societal stability.Publication Reforming Justice(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-12-09)This note explores the use of technology to enhance the efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of judicial service delivery. It examines how technological solutions can support streamlining internal court processes, facilitate access for court users, and support the quality of judicial decisions through legal drafting and research tools. The note also emphasizes the importance of framing judicial digitalization within the broader context of public service modernization. This approach goes beyond mere automation and technological tools, encompassing the standardization of court operations, rationalizing processes, and developing regulatory frameworks that enable digital justice while protecting citizens’ rights to a fair trial, privacy, and security. Additionally, the Note highlights the importance of supporting all stakeholders in interacting with new digital technologies to build capacity and trust in digital justice systems, ensuring that these reforms are inclusive and effectively implemented.Publication Making Justice Count : Measuring and Improving Judicial Performance in Brazil(Washington, DC, 2004-12-30)The present report, and the source of its findings, summarizes the results of research conducted in Brazil in 2003-2004. It is the second of two World Bank sponsored studies on the Brazilian judicial system. Its findings, while provocative, were obviously limited in their generalization, and as the study concluded, raised as many questions as they answered. This second effort is intended to address some of these questions by taking a broader, if less detailed look at sector operations - here defining the sector (or system) not just as the courts, but as the multiple formal and informal institutions involved in the resolution of conflicts through the application and enforcement of the legal framework.Publication Good Practices for Courts(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2016-09-12)As the SDGs become reality, countries continue to seek for options to meet the new goals and to keep track of their progress. This includes efforts related to the new Goal 16, “Justice and Peace”. Achieving the SDGs requires implementation in many areas. Today, courts in many countries are undergoing reforms, are interested in hearing about new trends in court operations elsewhere and in tracking court performance. The World Bank’s new publication “Good Practice for Courts—Helpful Elements for Good Court Performance and the World Bank’s Quality of Judicial Process Indicator (QJPI)” addresses this desire. Focusing on the 15 QJPI good practice areas, the publication reflects the findings from country studies and other reports from around the world that show how modern management approaches and advanced technologies provide new opportunities for courts and other justice sector agencies to modernize their operations to better reflect the changing needs of their communities as well as those of national and international markets. Simultaneously, the OECD, in collaboration with the Open Society Foundation, are focusing on collecting and highlighting innovative country approaches to promote access to legal and justice services as determinant of inclusive growth and contributor to the realization of Sustainable Development Goals.Publication Uses and Users of Justice in Africa : The Case of Ghana's Specialised Courts(World Bank, 2010-07-01)This research project involves the tracking of the progress of cases in Ghana's specialized courts. It seeks to provide data that are not usually available for a scientific assessment of the performance of the courts in Ghana. The project, therefore, captures information on the persons and institutions who use the courts in Ghana; what these claimants come to court for; the difficulties they encounter in the process; and the value added by recent court reforms in resolving these problems. Further analysis of this information is then used to make specific and targeted recommendations for improving overall adjudicatory effectiveness. The project is similar to other World Bank studies in many respects. It is premised on a general belief that, almost everywhere, courts struggle to deliver quick, effective, accessible, and efficient justice. The huge disconnect between intention and reality is due to a number of factors, namely, the cost of litigation-an issue which bears directly on access to justice; unprecedented delays in case processing; real and perceived corruption within the courts and increasing uncertainty associated with judges' rulings. Delays, generally defined as unreasonable time spent from case filing and processing to case disposition, stand out amongst the list of problems. There is, therefore, a recognized challenge that the judicial sector in Ghana is currently incapable of providing speedy justice, a critical ingredient for public and investor confidence in the justice system.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Reforming Justice(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-12-09)This note explores the use of technology to enhance the efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of judicial service delivery. It examines how technological solutions can support streamlining internal court processes, facilitate access for court users, and support the quality of judicial decisions through legal drafting and research tools. The note also emphasizes the importance of framing judicial digitalization within the broader context of public service modernization. This approach goes beyond mere automation and technological tools, encompassing the standardization of court operations, rationalizing processes, and developing regulatory frameworks that enable digital justice while protecting citizens’ rights to a fair trial, privacy, and security. Additionally, the Note highlights the importance of supporting all stakeholders in interacting with new digital technologies to build capacity and trust in digital justice systems, ensuring that these reforms are inclusive and effectively implemented.Publication Tanzania Diagnostic Review of Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013-11)In 2011, only 17.3 percemt of adults in Tanzania had an account at a formal financial institution and 56 percemt did not have any access to financial services. Most of the population lives in rural areas with very low incomes and poor infrastructure, and women are especially disadvantaged. Such limited access to formal financial services also inhibits financial literacy – awareness of benefits and risks, and how to take advantage of opportunities. Despite significant challenges, all institutional elements of the formal financial sector in Tanzania are in place, helping its gradual expansion, and in some segments technology is driving rapid growth – particularly in mobile and electronic payments. Still, gaps and weaknesses in financial consumer protection and financial education remain some of the main obstacles to sustainability and greater trust in the financial sector. This Diagnostic Review was requested by the Ministry of Finance of Tanzania in November 2012. It provides a detailed assessment of Tanzania’s institutional, legal and regulatory framework against the World Bank’s Good Practices for Financial Consumer Protection. Three segments of the financial sector have been analyzed: banking, microfinance, and pensions. Insurance and securities segments will be considered at a later stage. Volume I of the Review summarizes the key findings and recommendations and Volume II presents a detailed assessment of each financial segment compared to the Good Practices.Publication Reforming Justice(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-12-09)Adequate budgeting of the judiciary is critical for the effective delivery of justice. This brief presents trends in judicial budgets. Courts account for less than 2 percent of total government expenditure on average, with significant portions dedicated to fixed costs such as salaries, thereby limiting investments in technological advancements essential for improving judicial efficiency. This brief identifies three major trends in judicial budgeting reforms: increasing autonomy for the judiciary in budget management, accountability for budget execution at the court level, and a shift toward performance-based budgeting models. These reforms aim to bolster the judiciary's operational efficiency and public perception, ultimately linking adequate judicial funding to enhanced social and economic outcomes. The findings emphasize the necessity for judicial leaders to continuously advocate for resources by demonstrating the judiciary’s integral role in maintaining law and order, promoting democracy, and fostering societal stability.Publication Improving Access to Justice in Liberia – A 2023 JUPITER Assessment(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023-12-14)Liberia’s lack of effectiveness in handling judicial disputes has been consistently recognized as a weakness and one of the main obstacles to the country’s transition out of fragility. Liberia performs poorly in international datasets benchmarking justice and the rule of law. For instance, in the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index (WJP RLI), it ranked 112 out of 140 countries in 2022, meaning that it is among the thirty countries with the weakest adherence to the rule of law. This study originates from the Government’s desire to improve the delivery of justice to its citizens and to have recommendations on a practical sequence of reforms that are underpinned by hard data and analytics. In a first-of-its-kind JUPITER assessment, a standardized methodology is used to benchmark the state and performance of Liberia’s judiciary against specific measures of effectiveness and to compare key features across countries. The study focuses on the effectiveness of the system in service delivery in three areas – access to justice, efficiency, and quality – and presents the main challenges that emerged from the empirical work to provide data-informed context-specific suggestions for reform.Publication It Started in Ghana : Implementing Africa's First Collateral Registry(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-12)The author all want to build something that matters. From the advisory Services perspective, no matter the business line, it's about helping meaningful players accomplish sustainable results. However, entering a continent with a new product is something that can be extremely challenging. This smart lesson tells of a project that, against all odds, installed the first online collateral registry in Africa, designed in line with international best practices and following principles established by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.