Publication: Learning in World Bank Lending: An Independent Evaluation
Loading...
Date
2025-04-04
ISSN
Published
2025-04-04
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
The World Bank Group considers itself a “Knowledge Bank.” The Bank’s knowledge work contributes to development outcomes both by informing clients in various policy and reform areas, and by informing staff and clients on the selection, design, and implementation of lending operations. This evaluation assesses how the World Bank approaches knowledge and learning in its lending operations. It is guided by the overall question: “How can the World Bank create optimal conditions for learning in its financing operations?” The analysis covers all financing instruments, country, sectoral and operational knowledge, and tacit and explicit knowledge. The evaluation defines tacit knowledge as: unspoken, intuitive, and experiential insights that individuals accumulate over time. It defines explicit knowledge as: codified and digitized in books, documents, reports, memos, etc. The evaluation applies a mixed-methods, phased approach that combines case studies of 34 lending projects with desk reviews, interviews, a questionnaire, and quantitative analyses. Based on this analysis, the evaluation identifies lessons and presents recommendations with the aim to support ongoing efforts of the World Bank to improve its performance as a “Knowledge Bank” as outlined in the 2024 “Knowledge Compact for Action” and the 2021 “Strategic Framework for Knowledge” (SFK). Recommendations include: (i) Make better use of the learning opportunities that are already embedded in the lending process. (ii) The Knowledge and Learning Department should ensure core knowledge management capacity and set World Bank–wide standards and processes for knowledge capture, storage, sharing, and access.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. Learning in World Bank Lending: An Independent Evaluation. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43022 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication A Guide to the World Bank(Washington, DC, 2003)This book is intended for the wide range of people around the world who need basic information about the work of the Bank Group. This audience includes people working in all aspects of development, students, members of the general public, and staff members of the Bank Group itself. Because this audience is so broad, the text emphasizes the organizational and conceptual divisions of the Bank Group's activities and guides readers to potential sources of more-detailed explanations of the development work in progress. The annual reports of the Bank Group institutions provide more details on the volume and types of development assistance. The annual World Bank Group Directory lists telephone contacts for individuals and departments. The following chapters explain how the World Bank Group is organized; how it operates; and how its work focuses on countries, regions, and specific topics in development. Appendixes provide further information on Bank Group contacts, on the organization's history, on country membership and the voting shares in the institutions, on the sector and thematic categories for the Bank Group's activities, and on Bank Group resources in individual countries.Publication Learning in World Bank Lending (Approach Paper)(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-28)The World Bank has a comparative advantage in development knowledge that is valued by countries and its partners. This knowledge sets it apart from other development organizations and helps it attract partners, funding, and new business. The World Bank aims to promote the use of the best global and country knowledge available to inform operations. The World Bank’s knowledge contributes to outcomes directly (by informing clients in their reform efforts) and indirectly (via World Bank financing). Knowledge is embedded in World Bank–financed operations and is an important part of the World Bank’s value proposition for clients. Managing knowledge in a large organization like the World Bank is inherently complex. The World Bank has responded in many ways over the years, and more recently, developed the Strategic Framework for Knowledge (SFK). The new Knowledge Compact for Action is the World Bank’s latest approach to articulate its vision and approach to knowledge. It aims to transform the World Bank’s approach to knowledge, positioning it as a “21st century Knowledge Bank” and to create a dynamic knowledge ecosystem that facilitates knowledge flows within the Bank and externally. This evaluation’s broad purpose is to assist the ongoing efforts of the World Bank and the Committee on Development Effectiveness to improve learning in World Bank–financed operations. This evaluation is timely and relevant because it is aligned with management’s efforts to renew the World Bank’s leadership in development knowledge and develop the new Knowledge Compass.Publication Results and Performance of the World Bank Group 2024(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-03-13)The 2024 Results and Performance of the World Bank Group report – also known as the RAP– is the fourteenth annual report in the series. The RAP series aggregates and interprets evidence on World Bank Group performance, mainly using IEG’s validations of World Bank, International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) self-evaluations of projects and country programs. The 2024 RAP maintains symmetry across institutions by analyzing common or similar factors linked to performance, while acknowledging their differences. Hence, the RAP includes separate chapters for World Bank, IFC, MIGA, and country programs which allows more in-depth discussion of performance trends and relevant topics for each institution. The 2024 RAP covers projects implemented during the COVID-19 and subsequent food and energy crises, and also projects implemented at a time where the Bank has been prioritizing International Development Association (IDA ) countries and fragility and conflict situations. As a result, the portfolio has been increasingly exposed to risky contexts and periodic shocks, which in turn has impacted project performance and outcome ratings. This RAP identifies four levers that are significantly associated with stronger performance and better development outcomes – particularly in the face of riskier environments: enhancing the design of operations and country programs, adopting effective risk management, addressing client institutional and capacity challenges, and improving results monitoring.Publication Improving Effectiveness and Outcomes for the Poor in Health, Nutrition, and Population : An Evaluation of World Bank Group Support since 1997(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009)This evaluation aims to inform the implementation of the most recent the World Bank and International Finance Corporation (IFC) health, nutrition, and population (HNP) strategies to enhance the effectiveness of future support. It covers the period since fiscal year 1997 and is based on desk reviews of the portfolio, background studies, and field visits. The evaluation of the HNP support of the World Bank focuses on the effectiveness of policy dialogue, analytic work, and lending at the country level, while that of IFC focuses on the performance of health investments and advisory services before and after its 2002 health strategy. The themes it covers are drawn from the two strategies and the approaches adopted by international donors in the past decade. Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) has previously evaluated several aspects of the Bank's HNP support. IFC's support for the health sector has never been fully evaluated. Many lessons have been learned over the past decade about the successes and pitfalls of support for health reform: First, the failure to assess fully the political economy of reform and to prepare a proactive plan to address it can considerably diminish prospects for success. Political risks, the interests of key stakeholders, and the risk of complexity- issues the evaluation case studies found to be critical are often neglected in risk analysis in project appraisal documents for health reform projects. Second, reforms based on careful prior analytic work hold a greater chance of success, but analytic work does not ensure success. Third, the sequencing of reforms can improve political feasibility, reduce complexity, ensure that adequate capacity is in place, and facilitate learning. When implementation is flagging, the Bank can help preserve reform momentum with complementary programmatic lending through the Ministry of Finance, as it did in Peru and the Kyrgyz Republic. Finally, monitoring and evaluation are critical in health reform projects-to demonstrate the impact of pilot reforms to garner political support, but also because many reforms cannot work without a well-functioning management information system.Publication World Bank Corporate Scorecard September 2012(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012-09)The corporate scorecard provides information on the Bank's overall performance and results achieved by its clients against the backdrop of global development progress. The scorecard facilitates dialogue between management and the board on progress made and areas that need attention. The four-tier scorecard covers the full spectrum of International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and International Development Association (IDA) activities. The corporate scorecard uses an integrated results and performance framework, which is organized in a four-tier structure that groups indicators along the results chain Two of the tiers track elements of development results (tiers one and two), and the other two capture elements of performance (tiers three and four). As the summary shows, the corporate scorecard monitors, at an aggregate level, whether the Bank is functioning efficiently and adapting itself successfully (tier four), and whether it is managing its operations and services effectively (tier three) to support countries in achieving results (tier two) in the context of global development progress and priorities (tier one). It presents a high-level view and is not intended to provide country or activity-level information.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Air Quality Management in Central Asia(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-05-02)This report aims to enhance the understanding of the priorities, needs, and solutions for improving air quality (AQ) in Central Asia (CA) through local action and regional collaboration. It focuses on key components of holistic air quality management (AQM): evidence-based analytics to identify the main sources of air pollution in CA, application of modern tools to assess the impact of cost-effective measures to improve AQ, assessment of the institutional and governance setup for AQM in CA with recommendations to strengthen it, and approaches to financing AQ improvement. Given the lack of comprehensive systematic and validated emission inventories of all PM2.5 precursor emissions, the technical assessment employs the regional emission inventory of the Greenhouse Gas - Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model. Input data were updated for this study based on recent energy statistics and relevant national surveys. This report addresses emissions and the regional transboundary flows of pollution between Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Subsequently, the resulting PM2.5 concentrations in ambient air throughout CA were computed with the atmospheric chemistry and transport calculations of the GAINS model. Employing the source apportionment results of the GAINS model, the analysis then examines the contributions to PM2.5 population exposure. The report also presents source apportionment analyses for important air pollution hot spots in CA: Dushanbe (Tajikistan), Bishkek (the Kyrgyz Republic), Tashkent (Uzbekistan), Samarkand (Uzbekistan), Astana, and Almaty (Kazakhstan).Publication Services Unbound(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-12-09)Services are a new force for innovation, trade, and growth in East Asia and Pacific. The dramatic diffusion of digital technologies and partial policy reforms in services--from finance, communication, and transport to retail, health, and education--is transforming these economies. The result is higher productivity and changing jobs in the services sector, as well as in the manufacturing sectors that use these services. A region that has thrived through openness to trade and investment in manufacturing still maintains innovation-inhibiting barriers to entry and competition in key services sectors. 'Services Unbound: Digital Technologies and Policy Reform in East Asia and Pacific' makes the case for deeper domestic reforms and greater international cooperation to unleash a virtuous cycle of increased economic opportunity and enhanced human capacity that would power development in the region.Publication Zambia Poverty and Equity Assessment 2025(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-02-25)Zambia is simultaneously amongst the poorest and the most unequal countries in the world. In 2022, 64.3 percent of the population - about 12.6 million individuals - was living on less than US$2.15 a day. This level is not only the 6th highest in the world but it is also misaligned with the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita level. In four of the five poorer countries, GDP per capita is between one-quarter and one-half of Zambia’s GDP per capita. The remaining country is South Sudan, which is immersed in a protracted fragility and conflict situation. At the same time, consumption inequality is high, even when compared with the sub-group of highly unequal resource-rich countries. In 2022, the Gini index stood at 51.5 - significantly above the World Bank’s newly adopted high-inequality threshold of 40. This places Zambia as the country with the 4th highest inequality in the region and the 6th highest globally. Resource-rich countries with similar or higher inequality have substantially lower poverty levels.Publication Cities’ Partnership Initiative(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-04-24)Sustainable urban development is one of the key areas of development policy in Poland, which is in line with global trends. Sustainable urban development requires an integrated approach that takes into account the complexity and dynamics of phenomena and processes taking place in the urban environment. Meeting the challenges of urban development requires, on the one hand, a steady increase in the capacity of cities to plan and implement development projects, and on the other hand, a favorable regulatory and financial framework and support instruments that are an adequate response to the needs of urban centers. The Cities’ Partnership Initiative (CPI) is a flagship project of the Ministry of Development Funds and Regional Policy of Poland (MDFRP) aimed at supporting sustainable urban development. This final report is the third product of the Reimbursable Advisory Service Agreement on Sustainable Urban Development - Cities’ Partnership Initiative concluded between the MDFRP and the World Bank on January 28, 2022. The report summarizes the project work, including the results of the work of 30 CPI-participating cities, and presents conclusions and recommendations on the three thematic networks and the CPI formula itself.Publication Classroom Assessment to Support Foundational Literacy(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-03-21)This document focuses primarily on how classroom assessment activities can measure students’ literacy skills as they progress along a learning trajectory towards reading fluently and with comprehension by the end of primary school grades. The document addresses considerations regarding the design and implementation of early grade reading classroom assessment, provides examples of assessment activities from a variety of countries and contexts, and discusses the importance of incorporating classroom assessment practices into teacher training and professional development opportunities for teachers. The structure of the document is as follows. The first section presents definitions and addresses basic questions on classroom assessment. Section 2 covers the intersection between assessment and early grade reading by discussing how learning assessment can measure early grade reading skills following the reading learning trajectory. Section 3 compares some of the most common early grade literacy assessment tools with respect to the early grade reading skills and developmental phases. Section 4 of the document addresses teacher training considerations in developing, scoring, and using early grade reading assessment. Additional issues in assessing reading skills in the classroom and using assessment results to improve teaching and learning are reviewed in section 5. Throughout the document, country cases are presented to demonstrate how assessment activities can be implemented in the classroom in different contexts.