Publication: Sri Lanka : Justice Sector Review
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-02T22:24:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-02T22:24:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-06 | |
dc.description.abstract | Improvement of the performance of the judiciary is an important part of a growth agenda for Sri Lanka as it moves to middle income country status. The present government has set ambitious targets to double gross domestic product (GDP) per capita by 2016 and has cited the need for a more efficient judicial sector as a means of reducing poverty. This is consistent with the broad historical evidence that a well-functioning judicial sector is the most effective long-term instrument for securing property rights and enforcing contracts, which in turn are critical factors for investment and commerce, and hence poverty reduction and economic growth. Sri Lanka ranks 133rd in the 2013 doing business's sub-index on enforcement of contracts, a level that is comparable to other South Asian countries but lower than other middle income comparators such as Thailand (ranked 23rd) and Malaysia (ranked 33rd). Identifying the contributing factors to inefficiency in Sri Lanka's courts in hearing commercial cases is the main purpose of this review. The findings in the report are based on available statistics on court performance and interviews with key stakeholders in the justice sector. The report is structured as follows: chapter one gives introduction, chapter two gives organization and management of the courts, chapter three gives data on case handling in courts, chapter four deals with private sector approaches to dispute resolution, chapter five focuses on legal and procedural issues in commercial cases, chapter six gives past reform efforts, and chapter seven gives conclusions and recommendations. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/18023414/sri-lanka-justice-sector-review | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/16051 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/16051 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Washington, DC | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | ADJUDICATION | |
dc.subject | ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | |
dc.subject | APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS | |
dc.subject | ARBITERS | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION ACT | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION AWARDS | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION CLAUSES | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATIONS | |
dc.subject | ATTORNEYS | |
dc.subject | AWARD | |
dc.subject | BREACH OF CONTRACT | |
dc.subject | BRIBERY | |
dc.subject | CASE MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES | |
dc.subject | CIVIL COURTS | |
dc.subject | CIVIL PROCEDURE | |
dc.subject | CLAIM | |
dc.subject | CODE OF ETHICS | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL COURTS | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL DISPUTES | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL LAW | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL MEDIATION | |
dc.subject | COMMUNITY MEDIATION | |
dc.subject | CONCILIATION | |
dc.subject | CORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | COUNSEL | |
dc.subject | COURT | |
dc.subject | COURT ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | COURT BUILDINGS | |
dc.subject | COURT DECISIONS | |
dc.subject | COURT JUDGMENTS | |
dc.subject | COURT OPERATIONS | |
dc.subject | COURT PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | COURT PROCEEDINGS | |
dc.subject | COURT RULES | |
dc.subject | COURT SESSIONS | |
dc.subject | COURTHOUSES | |
dc.subject | COURTS | |
dc.subject | CRIME | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL CASES | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL PROCEDURE | |
dc.subject | CROSS EXAMINATION | |
dc.subject | CROSS EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES | |
dc.subject | CUSTODY | |
dc.subject | CUSTOMS | |
dc.subject | DETAINEES | |
dc.subject | DISMISSAL | |
dc.subject | DISPUTE | |
dc.subject | DISPUTE RESOLUTION | |
dc.subject | DISPUTES | |
dc.subject | DISTRICT COURTS | |
dc.subject | DIVORCE | |
dc.subject | ENFORCEMENT OF AWARDS | |
dc.subject | ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS | |
dc.subject | EQUALITY | |
dc.subject | EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES | |
dc.subject | FEMALE | |
dc.subject | FINAL AWARD | |
dc.subject | FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS | |
dc.subject | FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | GENDER | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | INJUNCTIONS | |
dc.subject | INJUNCTIVE RELIEF | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY | |
dc.subject | INSURANCE | |
dc.subject | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | |
dc.subject | INTERIM MEASURES OF PROTECTION | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION | |
dc.subject | JUDGE | |
dc.subject | JUDGES | |
dc.subject | JUDGMENTS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL OFFICERS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL PROCESS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL REFORM | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SECTOR | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SERVICE | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SERVICES | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL TRAINING | |
dc.subject | JUDICIARY | |
dc.subject | JURISDICTION | |
dc.subject | JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | JUSTICES | |
dc.subject | LAWS | |
dc.subject | LAWYERS | |
dc.subject | LEGAL AID | |
dc.subject | LEGAL CHANGES | |
dc.subject | LEGAL PROFESSION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL REFORMS | |
dc.subject | LEGAL REPRESENTATION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL SERVICES | |
dc.subject | LEGAL SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | LEGAL SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATION | |
dc.subject | LITIGANTS | |
dc.subject | LITIGATION | |
dc.subject | MAGISTRATES | |
dc.subject | MEDIATION | |
dc.subject | MEDIATION BOARDS | |
dc.subject | MEDIATION CENTER | |
dc.subject | MISBEHAVIOR | |
dc.subject | PENAL CODE | |
dc.subject | POLICE | |
dc.subject | POLICE OFFICERS | |
dc.subject | PRISONERS | |
dc.subject | PROCEDURAL MATTERS | |
dc.subject | PROPERTY RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | RESIDENCES | |
dc.subject | RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES | |
dc.subject | SALE OF PROPERTY | |
dc.subject | SANCTION | |
dc.subject | TRIALS | |
dc.subject | TRIBUNALS | |
dc.subject | VICTIMS | |
dc.subject | WILL | |
dc.subject | WITNESS | |
dc.subject | WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS | |
dc.title | Sri Lanka : Justice Sector Review | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Gender | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2013-07-19 | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-05-07T10:39:14.627722Z | |
okr.doctype | Economic & Sector Work::Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment | |
okr.doctype | Economic & Sector Work | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/06/18023414/sri-lanka-justice-sector-review | |
okr.globalpractice | Governance | |
okr.guid | 255751468164662812 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000442464_20130719100921 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 18023414 | |
okr.identifier.report | 77662 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/07/19/000442464_20130719100921/Rendered/PDF/776620LK0ESW0P00Box377382B00PUBLIC0.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | South Asia | |
okr.region.country | Sri Lanka | |
okr.sector | Public Administration, Law, and Justice :: Law and justice | |
okr.theme | Public sector governance :: Public expenditure, financial management and procurement | |
okr.theme | Rule of law :: Access to law and justice | |
okr.theme | Rule of law :: Judicial and other dispute resolution mechanisms | |
okr.theme | Rule of law :: Legal institutions for a market economy | |
okr.topic | Legal Institutions of the Market Economy | |
okr.topic | Gender::Gender and Law | |
okr.topic | Law and Development::Judicial System Reform | |
okr.topic | Law and Development::Arbitration | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Development | |
okr.unit | Governance & Public Sector (SASGP) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1