Publication:
Romania Judicial Functional Review

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWorld Bank
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-18T21:25:18Z
dc.date.available2014-12-18T21:25:18Z
dc.date.issued2013-03
dc.description.abstractThis review is one of a series of functional reviews commissioned by the Government of Romania (GOR), funded by the European Union, and carried out by the World Bank. It is an element agreed on by the European Union and the Government as part of the post-accession Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) established to assess further need for reform in the judicial system and to suggest reforms that would ensure Romania's full integration into the European Union system. The objective of the review is to analyze the functioning of institutions of the judicial system in Romania with a view to providing analytical and advisory input to the Romanian authorities as they formulate an action program to improve the performance of the judicial system. The present report covers a large part of Romania's judicial system, a term used here with broad scope. In accord with the terms of reference (appendix one), in addition to the courts, the review covers the Ministry of Justice, focusing on those functions most directly related to the judiciary and to the Public Ministry (PM), the PM itself, and a range of independent legal professionals whose work complements and in some cases replaces that of judges and prosecutors. Within the judiciary, aside from the ordinary courts, the review also addressed the operations of the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Judicial Inspectorate, and the High Court of Cassation and Justice, all of which operate quasi-independently. They have their own budgets and administrative structures, although are still governed by laws on staffing set by Parliament and staffing levels approved by the cabinet. Within the PM, the team also looked at the quasi-independent National Anti-Corruption Directorate.en
dc.identifierhttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review
dc.identifier.doi10.1596/20808
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10986/20808
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWashington, DC
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subjectABUSE
dc.subjectABUSES
dc.subjectACCESS TO JUSTICE
dc.subjectACCESSION
dc.subjectACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subjectACRONYMS
dc.subjectADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
dc.subjectALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
dc.subjectANNUAL REPORTS
dc.subjectANTI-CORRUPTION
dc.subjectANTICORRUPTION
dc.subjectAPPELLATE COURTS
dc.subjectARBITRATION
dc.subjectARRANGEMENTS
dc.subjectATTORNEYS
dc.subjectBAILIFFS
dc.subjectBAR ASSOCIATIONS
dc.subjectBENCHMARKS
dc.subjectBRIBE
dc.subjectBRIBES
dc.subjectBUSINESS PROCESS
dc.subjectCAPABILITIES
dc.subjectCAPITAL INVESTMENTS
dc.subjectCHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
dc.subjectCLASSIFICATION
dc.subjectCOLLAPSE
dc.subjectCOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
dc.subjectCOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
dc.subjectCOMPENSATION
dc.subjectCOMPLAINT
dc.subjectCOMPLAINTS
dc.subjectCONFIDENCE
dc.subjectCONSTITUTIONAL COURT
dc.subjectCONTENTS
dc.subjectCONVICTIONS
dc.subjectCORRUPT
dc.subjectCOURT
dc.subjectCOURT PROCEEDINGS
dc.subjectCOURT RECORDS
dc.subjectCOURTS
dc.subjectCRIME
dc.subjectCRIMES
dc.subjectCRIMINAL
dc.subjectCRIMINAL CASES
dc.subjectCRIMINAL PROCEDURES
dc.subjectDATA WAREHOUSE
dc.subjectDETENTION
dc.subjectDISPUTE RESOLUTION
dc.subjectDISTRICT COURTS
dc.subjectDOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectDOCUMENTS
dc.subjectELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
dc.subjectELECTRONIC FILING
dc.subjectENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
dc.subjectENTRIES
dc.subjectENTRY
dc.subjectEU
dc.subjectFAIR TRIAL
dc.subjectFILINGS
dc.subjectFINANCIAL RESOURCE
dc.subjectFINANCIAL RESOURCES
dc.subjectGENERAL PUBLIC
dc.subjectGOVERNMENT POLICIES
dc.subjectHARDWARE
dc.subjectHUMAN RESOURCE
dc.subjectHUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY
dc.subjectHUMAN RESOURCES
dc.subjectHUMAN RIGHTS
dc.subjectICT
dc.subjectINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
dc.subjectINFORMATION INTEGRATION
dc.subjectINFORMATION SERVICES
dc.subjectINFORMATION SYSTEM
dc.subjectINITIATIVE
dc.subjectINSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subjectINTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
dc.subjectINTEROPERABILITY
dc.subjectINVENTORY
dc.subjectINVESTIGATION
dc.subjectINVESTIGATIONS
dc.subjectJUDGE
dc.subjectJUDGES
dc.subjectJUDGMENTS
dc.subjectJUDICIAL CORRUPTION
dc.subjectJUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
dc.subjectJUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
dc.subjectJUDICIAL REFORM
dc.subjectJUDICIAL SERVICE
dc.subjectJUDICIAL SERVICES
dc.subjectJUDICIAL SYSTEM
dc.subjectJUDICIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectJUDICIARY
dc.subjectJURISDICTION
dc.subjectJUSTICE
dc.subjectLAWS
dc.subjectLAWYER
dc.subjectLAWYERS
dc.subjectLEGAL AID
dc.subjectLEGAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subjectLEGAL CHANGES
dc.subjectLEGAL COUNSEL
dc.subjectLEGAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subjectLEGAL INTERPRETATION
dc.subjectLEGAL PROFESSIONALS
dc.subjectLEGAL REFORM
dc.subjectLEGAL SERVICES
dc.subjectLEGAL SYSTEM
dc.subjectLEGALITY
dc.subjectLEGISLATION
dc.subjectLITIGATION
dc.subjectLOGIC
dc.subjectMAGISTRATES
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT SYSTEM
dc.subjectMEDIATION
dc.subjectMILITARY COURTS
dc.subjectMINISTER
dc.subjectMINISTERS
dc.subjectNATIONAL INTEGRITY
dc.subjectNOTARIES
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS
dc.subjectPENSION
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
dc.subjectPRISONS
dc.subjectPRIVATE SECTOR
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVITY
dc.subjectPROSECUTION
dc.subjectPROSECUTOR
dc.subjectPROSECUTORS
dc.subjectPROTOCOLS
dc.subjectREGISTRY
dc.subjectREGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
dc.subjectREMEDIES
dc.subjectRESULT
dc.subjectRESULTS
dc.subjectSANCTIONS
dc.subjectSEARCH
dc.subjectSECURITY POLICY
dc.subjectSENTENCES
dc.subjectSERVICE DELIVERY
dc.subjectSOCIAL SECURITY
dc.subjectSTATE COURTS
dc.subjectSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectTARGETS
dc.subjectTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subjectTERRORISM
dc.subjectTIME FRAME
dc.subjectTIME PERIOD
dc.subjectTRANSPARENCY
dc.subjectTRIALS
dc.subjectTRIBUNALS
dc.subjectUSER
dc.subjectUSER GROUPS
dc.subjectUSER TRAINING
dc.subjectUSERS
dc.subjectVERIFICATION
dc.subjectVICTIMS
dc.subjectWILL
dc.subjectWORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
dc.titleRomania Judicial Functional Reviewen
dspace.entity.typePublication
okr.crosscuttingsolutionareaGender
okr.date.disclosure2014-10-28
okr.date.doiregistration2025-05-07T08:57:13.766791Z
okr.doctypeEconomic & Sector Work::Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment
okr.docurlhttp://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review
okr.globalpracticeGovernance
okr.globalpracticeTransport and ICT
okr.guid743471468104952374
okr.guid971981468293466653
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum000470435_20141028073910
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum20329626
okr.identifier.report79697
okr.language.supporteden
okr.pdfurlhttp://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/10/28/000470435_20141028073910/Rendered/PDF/796970WP0REVIS0Functional0Review0EN.pdfen
okr.region.administrativeEurope and Central Asia
okr.region.countryRomania
okr.sectorPublic Administration, Law, and Justice :: Central government administration
okr.themeRule of law :: Law reform
okr.topicLaw and Development::Judicial System Reform
okr.topicInformation Security and Privacy
okr.topicGender::Gender and Law
okr.topicPrivate Sector Development::E-Business
okr.topicPublic Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures
okr.topicPublic Sector Development
okr.topicInformation and Communication Technologies
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
796970WP0REVIS0Functional0Review0EN.pdf
Size:
2.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
796970WP0REVIS0Functional0Review0EN.txt
Size:
573.24 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment