Publication: Replication Redux: The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming
dc.contributor.author | Ozier, Owen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T16:52:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-19T16:52:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | In 2004, a landmark study showed that an inexpensive medication to treat parasitic worms could improve health and school attendance for millions of children in many developing countries. Eleven years later, a headline in The Guardian reported that this treatment, deworming, had been “debunked.” The pronouncement followed an effort to replicate and re-analyze the original study, as well as an update to a systematic review of the effects of deworming. This story made waves amidst discussion of a reproducibility crisis in some of the social sciences. In this paper, I explore what it means to “replicate” and “reanalyze” a study, both in general and in the specific case of deworming. I review the broader replication efforts in economics, then examine the key findings of the original deworming paper in light of the “replication,” “reanalysis,” and “systematic review.” I also discuss the nature of the link between this single paper's findings, other papers’ findings, and any policy recommendations about deworming. Through this example, I provide a perspective on the ways replication and reanalysis work, the strengths and weaknesses of systematic reviews, and whether there is, in fact, a reproducibility crisis in economics. | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/40040 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0257-3032 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1564-6971 (online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40040 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | World Bank Research Observer | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo | |
dc.subject | DATA ACCESS | |
dc.subject | DEWORMING | |
dc.subject | HEALTH | |
dc.subject | EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | META-ANALYSIS | |
dc.subject | SYSTEMATIC REVIEW | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC HEALTH | |
dc.subject | REPLICATION | |
dc.subject | ROBUSTNESS | |
dc.subject | WORMS | |
dc.title | Replication Redux | en |
dc.title.subtitle | The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.associatedcontent | https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/36/1/101/6009048 Journal website (version of record) | |
okr.crossref.title | Replication Redux: The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2023-07-19 | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::Journal Article | |
okr.identifier.doi | 10.1093/wbro/lkaa005 | |
okr.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/40040 | |
okr.journal.nbpages | 101-130 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.region.geographical | World | |
okr.topic | Health, Nutrition and Population::Health Monitoring & Evaluation | |
okr.topic | Information and Communication Technologies::ICT Data and Statistics | |
okr.volume | 36 (1) | |
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication | 814f9fde-0439-41b9-ae8c-f04098686612 | |
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 814f9fde-0439-41b9-ae8c-f04098686612 | |
relation.isJournalOfPublication | 9e5fbe82-492f-4142-8378-17d50245d9de | |
relation.isJournalVolumeOfPublication | e501f972-8746-4257-a8e9-4e9103ef446a |