Publication:
Replication Redux: The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming

dc.contributor.authorOzier, Owen
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-19T16:52:16Z
dc.date.available2023-07-19T16:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-28
dc.description.abstractIn 2004, a landmark study showed that an inexpensive medication to treat parasitic worms could improve health and school attendance for millions of children in many developing countries. Eleven years later, a headline in The Guardian reported that this treatment, deworming, had been “debunked.” The pronouncement followed an effort to replicate and re-analyze the original study, as well as an update to a systematic review of the effects of deworming. This story made waves amidst discussion of a reproducibility crisis in some of the social sciences. In this paper, I explore what it means to “replicate” and “reanalyze” a study, both in general and in the specific case of deworming. I review the broader replication efforts in economics, then examine the key findings of the original deworming paper in light of the “replication,” “reanalysis,” and “systematic review.” I also discuss the nature of the link between this single paper's findings, other papers’ findings, and any policy recommendations about deworming. Through this example, I provide a perspective on the ways replication and reanalysis work, the strengths and weaknesses of systematic reviews, and whether there is, in fact, a reproducibility crisis in economics.en
dc.identifier.doi10.1596/40040
dc.identifier.issn0257-3032 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1564-6971 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40040
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublished by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorld Bank Research Observer
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holderWorld Bank
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo
dc.subjectDATA ACCESS
dc.subjectDEWORMING
dc.subjectHEALTH
dc.subjectEDUCATION
dc.subjectMETA-ANALYSIS
dc.subjectSYSTEMATIC REVIEW
dc.subjectPUBLIC HEALTH
dc.subjectREPLICATION
dc.subjectROBUSTNESS
dc.subjectWORMS
dc.titleReplication Reduxen
dc.title.subtitleThe Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Dewormingen
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
okr.associatedcontenthttps://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/36/1/101/6009048 Journal website (version of record)
okr.crossref.titleReplication Redux: The Reproducibility Crisis and the Case of Deworming
okr.date.disclosure2023-07-19
okr.doctypePublications & Research::Journal Article
okr.identifier.doi10.1093/wbro/lkaa005
okr.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1596/40040
okr.journal.nbpages101-130
okr.language.supporteden
okr.region.geographicalWorld
okr.topicHealth, Nutrition and Population::Health Monitoring & Evaluation
okr.topicInformation and Communication Technologies::ICT Data and Statistics
okr.volume36 (1)
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication814f9fde-0439-41b9-ae8c-f04098686612
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscovery814f9fde-0439-41b9-ae8c-f04098686612
relation.isJournalOfPublication9e5fbe82-492f-4142-8378-17d50245d9de
relation.isJournalVolumeOfPublicatione501f972-8746-4257-a8e9-4e9103ef446a
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
lkaa005.pdf
Size:
622.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections