Publication: Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Jordan
Loading...
Published
2004-06
ISSN
Date
2013-07-24
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This report provides an assessment of Jordan's corporate governance policy framework, enforcement and compliance practices. Strengths and weaknesses are highlighted and policy recommendations are made where appropriate. Much progress was made in the regulatory environment in the 1990s, since the creation of the Jordan Securities Commission, the Amman Stock Exchange, and the Securities Depository Center. The report identifies several key next steps that focus on implementation, including: (i) developing a Code of Corporate Governance that focuses on the role, duties, and functions of the board; (ii) focused enforcement of the disclosure provisions, with continued emphasis on a review of content; (iii) revision of the Company Law to bring the policy framework into greater compliance with the OECD Principles, and (iv) a review of the regulatory jurisdictions of the three main regulatory bodies that oversee corporate governance. Together, these measures will bring Jordan into the mainstream of the worldwide corporate governance reform movement and provide new opportunities for issuers to implement international good practice.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2004. Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Jordan. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14522 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
Digital Object Identifier
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Hungary : Corporate Governance Country Assessment(Washington, DC, 2003-02)This report assesses the corporate governance policy framework and enforcement and compliance practices in Hungary. Hungary has already invested considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet European Union Directives, and the legislative and regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance issues is robust. The major issues identified by this review include: (1) the general weakness of the supervisory board, which causes some non-compliance with several OECD Principles; and (2) a conflict between law and practice in the area of share registration, particularly the problems related to the ability of all shareholders to attend meetings and exercise their voting and other rights. Strengths and weaknesses are highlighted, and the policy recommendations made may be grouped under three categories: legislative reform, institutional strengthening, and voluntary/private initiatives. The report recommends creating a "share registration working group" to synchronize law and practice in the area of shareholder record keeping and voting. It also makes recommendations to be implemented as part of a Company Law update. Finally, the report promotes private sector initiatives and capacity building to build on legislative progress on corporate governance reform. It recommends developing a Hungarian corporate governance code of best practice, which would address key issues to include supervisory board roles and institutional investor responsibilities. The report also proposes that an Institute of Directors be created train supervisory board members, disseminate best practice, and promote dialogue between the public and private sectors. Together, these measures give issuers the choice to implement best practice and investors a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Hungary.Publication Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Republic of Lithuania(Washington, DC, 2002-07)This assessment benchmarks the Lithuanian corporate governance system against the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and highlights a number of areas where Lithuania's corporate governance system can be strengthened. Lithuania has already invested considerable resources in upgrading its legislation to meet EU Directives, and the legislative and regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance issues is quite robust. The policy recommendations can be grouped under three broad categories: legislative reform, institutional strengthening and voluntary/private initiatives. The legislative and regulatory framework dealing with corporate governance practices has undergone substantial change. The most serious problem is compliance and enforcement. While the assessment highlights several areas where Lithuania's corporate governance system could be strengthened, the priority should be given to the enforcement of existing laws. This report promotes private sector initiatives and capacity building to follow up on the legislative progress on corporate governance reform. It recommends the development of a Lithuanian or regional voluntary code of best practice in corporate governance. The code should be prepared by a task force coordinated by the LSE and made up of public and private sector representatives. In addition, the report proposes the creation of a regional Institute of Directors, to provide training for supervisory board members, disseminate best practice and play a vital role in the dialogue between the public and private sector. Together, these measures give issuers the choice to implement best practice and investors a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Lithuania.Publication Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Republic of the Philippines(Washington, DC, 2001-09)Corporate governance in the Philippines is characterized by concentrated ownership by a limited number of family shareholders, within a bank-dominated financial market. A comprehensive set of corporate law and capital market regulations are enforced by relatively weak institutions that are undergoing restructuring reforms. As in many East Asian countries, the need to strengthen corporate governance was highlighted during the financial crisis in the region, and recent securities market scandals. This report benchmarks Philippine corporate governance against the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, which have been recognized as one of the core standards underpinning the international financial architecture. As such, the report focuses primarily on corporate governance issues affecting listed companies and equity providers. Recommendations on related corporate governance issues such as banking and the governance of group structures, though relevant to the reform dialogue, are beyond the scope of this report. (Two parallel ROSCs are being prepared to assess the Philippines on accounting and auditing, and insolvency and creditor rights, which will provide greater detail on these issues.) The policy recommendations in this ROSC are intended to highlight areas in which the Philippine corporate governance system could be strengthened. They are grouped under four main headings: improving the disclosure of non-financial information, strengthening the rights of (minority) shareholders, enhancing the role of the board of directors, and ensuring the independence of the audit.Publication Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes : Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Republic of Indonesia(Washington, DC, 2004-08)In reforming its corporate governance, and in establishing a rule-based business culture, Indonesia faces many challenges. The key challenges are as follows. Enforcement of laws and regulations needs to be strengthened. Administrative sanctions for violation of securities or disclosure rules may not be adequate. Efforts should be expended to ensure that corporate officials in the position of trust are held accountable when they violate the law. Sanctions should go beyond fines, and the incentive system should be changed so that violators are truly discouraged, and good corporate behavior is promoted. This requires strengthening enforcement capacity of Bapepam for securities violations, and its independence as the securities regulator. The Company Law should explicitly refer to the fiduciary duties of directors and managers for violation of securities laws. Current efforts to amend the Company Law need to be expedited. Further efforts should also be expended to develop alternative (non-judiciary) mechanisms, such as shareholder activism, for encouraging compliance.Publication Corporate Governance Country Assessment : Egypt(Washington, DC, 2004-03-01)This report provides an updated assessment of Egypt's corporate governance policy framework, enforcement and compliance practices. It highlights recent improvements in corporate governance regulation, makes policy recommendations, and provides investors with a benchmark against which to measure corporate governance in Egypt. In recent years there have been a number of major reforms, mostly incorporated in new stock exchange listing rules. However, experience in other countries suggests that implementation and enforcement of the rules remain central. The report identifies several key next steps that focus on implementation, including (i) building a Center for Directors that can help develop a Code of Corporate Governance on the role, duties, and functions of the board, and create a director training capability; (ii) focused enforcement of the new listing rules and disclosure provisions, with continued emphasis on a review of content, and (iii) implementation of legislative reform to bring the policy framework into greater compliance with the OECD Principles. Together, these measures will help to implement the recent reforms and provide new opportunities for issuers to implement best practices.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Comoros Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-06-18)The Union of the Comoros (The Comoros) has significant vulnerability to climate change-related risks but has considerable opportunities to strengthen preparedness and resilience against these challenges. According to the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index, the Comoros is the 29th-most vulnerable country to climate change and the 163rd most ready to adapt (out of 191). The Comoros archipelago is exposed to many natural hazards that adversely affect the country’s natural capital, people, and physical infrastructure. In 2014, the economic cost of climate-related disasters was estimated at 5.7 million dollars annually, equivalent to 9.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Between 2018 and 2023, as many as 11 tropical depressions or cyclones impacted the country, with Cyclone Kenneth causing the greatest damage, equivalent to 14 percent of GDP, resulting in total economic growth falling from 3.6 percent in 2018 to 1.9 percent in 2019. More than 345,000 people (40 percent of the population) were affected by the cyclone, with 185,000 people experiencing severe impacts and 12,000 people displaced. However, there is an opportunity for the country to grow more robust and shock-responsive, and to establish pre-positioned funding mechanisms to enhance future crisis response efforts. For the Comoros, adaptation and climate-resilient development are the key climate change focus areas, with the country projected to face 836 million dollars 2050 in additional costs due to climate-related impacts. Current plans to adapt to the impacts of climate change in the Comoros include efforts to improve water management, strengthen coastal protection, and develop climate-smart agriculture practices. Given the country’s reliance on its natural resource base for economic growth and mobility, protection of these resources from climate change will be essential for promoting resilient growth and development. In addition to growing the adaptive capacity of the country’s natural resource sectors, strategic economic diversification will be important to help minimize future climate impacts, and development activities will need to be undertaken in such a way as to attract low-carbon co-benefits. The Union of the Comoros is committed to addressing climate change through its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and national priorities. The country’s NDC (which was revised in 2021 for a ten-year horizon) sets ambitious targets, with a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 23 percent by 2030. The country also plans to significantly increase the share of renewable energy in its energy portfolio, reaching 33 MW by 2030. This will not only promote low-carbon development but also reduce the country’s dependency on imported oil and coal, which currently make up 95 percent of the energy mix. Additionally, the Comoros has declared its intention to increase CO2 removals by 47 percent by 2030, compared to BAU.Publication Guinea-Bissau Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-23)Guinea-Bissau is endowed with a wealth of natural resources, with the highest natural capital per capita in West Africa (US3,874 dollars per capita), which could be leveraged for sustainable and resilient growth. However, Guinea-Bissau faces significant development hurdles, such as high poverty rates, political instability, and economic challenges, including an over-reliance on cashew nuts. Rural poverty has increased, and the nation's infrastructure, education, and health care systems are underdeveloped. Climate change poses a severe threat, potentially impacting agriculture, fisheries, and infrastructure. Without adaptation, it could lead to a significant cut in real GDP per capita (minus 7.3 percent by 2050) and increase in poverty (with up to over 200,000 additional poor by 2050, that is, 5 percent of the expected population, in the worst scenario). The country's low greenhouse gas emissions are expected to rise, mainly due to agriculture and land-use changes, with deforestation being a major contributing factor. Although Guinea-Bissau is a low emitter, it has high mitigation ambitions, targeting a 30 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. The Nationally Determined Contribution outlines significant climate actions, with initiatives focused on forest conservation, sustainable agriculture, and community development. However, the country's political instability, institutional weaknesses, and limited financial resources pose challenges to implementing these climate commitments, which depend heavily on external funding. The financial sector's underdevelopment and vulnerability to external shocks limit its ability to support green investments, though reforms could enhance resilience. Guinea-Bissau must consider its climate financing as development financing and vice-versa, engage the private sector, and integrate climate goals with national development plans to ensure a sustainable future. Concessional climate financing is vital due to the underdeveloped financial sector and the government’s limited borrowing capacity. Addressing Guinea-Bissau's vulnerability to climate change and its structural issues requires a cohesive approach that integrates development and climate strategies. This could involve improving governance, diversifying the economy, protecting natural capital, developing human capital, and investing in sustainable agriculture and infrastructure. The transition to a more sustainable and inclusive development pathway that supports economic growth is possible, but requires focusing on key strategic sectors, enhancing institutional capacity, and creating the conditions to mobilize finance. As a highly vulnerable country, there are myriad needs in the different sectors; however, to be more efficient and effective, Guinea-Bissau should prioritize actions in a few sectors, especially actions on biodiversity, agriculture, and social protection. Low carbon development, especially in energy and forestry sectors, could provide cost-efficient solutions and attract climate finance, including from the private sector, which will support the overall development agenda.Publication Tajikistan Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-03-28)The Tajikistan Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR) explores the impact of climate change and global decarbonization on Tajikistan’s development. It identifies key areas to enhance climate resilience and deepen decarbonization and outlines priority recommendations for a successful green transition in Tajikistan, requiring structural reforms, climate-conscious policies, and inclusive strategies for a resilient and sustainable future. Despite economic growth and poverty reduction over the past two decades, Tajikistan's reliance on natural resources and remittances has led to unsustainable development, depleting natural capital and limiting job creation. The government’s green transition plan focuses on renewable energy, promising energy security, economic growth, and regional electricity exports. However, further efforts are needed for a resilient development path, including a complementary reform program to bring significant economic benefits, climate adaptation, and low-carbon development that will benefit Tajikistan and Central Asia's electricity systems. Climate change poses significant risks, threatening water security, agricultural productivity, and infrastructure, potentially reducing GDP per capita by 5-6% by mid-century and pushing 100,000 people into poverty. Additional adaptation measures are crucial, focusing on water management, resilient landscapes, climate-smart agriculture, and disaster risk management. A low-carbon development pathway offers a more resilient and prosperous future, with near net-zero emissions in energy and waste sectors by 2050, boosting economic growth, and job creation and reducing air pollution. Achieving these goals requires substantial investments and institutional reforms to mobilize private capital and attract green foreign investment. Development partners can provide financial assistance, technical expertise, and capacity building.Publication Kyrgyz Republic Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025-11-03)This Country Climate and Development Report (CCDR) on the Kyrgyz Republic aims to support the country’s development goals amid a changing climate. The CCDR considers two policy scenarios up to 2050: the business-as-usual (BAU) and high-growth scenarios. As it quantifies the likely impacts of climate change on the Kyrgyz economy between now and 2050, the report highlights key government actions to best prepare for and adapt to climate impacts (referred to as “with adaptation” measures), with a particular focus on the time horizon up to 2030. The CCDR also outlines a path to net zero emissions by 2050 (referred to as “with mitigation” measures, “decarbonization,” or, simply, “net zero 2050”), highlighting associated development co-benefits.Publication Mongolia Country Climate and Development Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2024-10-22)Mongolia’s development prospects are uniquely challenged by both the impacts of climate change and the global shift toward a low-carbon economy. The country’s efforts toward decarbonization pose significant challenges given the structurally high-emission intensity of its economy. While challenging, climate action also presents Mongolia with opportunities to achieve important development benefits. The effects of climate risks and the shift away from coal will have diverse impacts across different regions, communities, and socioeconomic levels. The report assesses the critical interconnections between Mongolia’s development ambitions and climate change action and identifies ways to transition to a more economically diversified, inclusive, and resilient development path. It highlights key climate and transition risks affecting Mongolia’s future development and presents a pathway to enhance climate mitigation and adaptation. The report also makes a case for strengthening policies to enhance resilience to climate change and ensure a just transition, particularly for the most vulnerable. The report is structured as follows: section 1 gives introduction. Section 2 delves into the linkages between development and climate in Mongolia and presents model-based findings on the economic and poverty impacts of climate change under different scenarios. Section 3 covers four in-depth sectoral analyses. The first two mainly focus on adaptation to climate change in the agriculture and water sectors. The third considers prospects for the extraction sector, while the fourth sectoral analysis focuses on decarbonizing power and heat generation. Section 4 shifts the focus to how the government can boost resilience for climate-vulnerable populations. Section 5 outlines options for mobilizing private and public financing and private investments to support the green transition. Section 6 examines the existing institutional and governance structure for climate action and presents recommendations to improve its effectiveness, and section 7 concludes with a framework for prioritizing the policy actions outlined in this report.