Publication:
Beneficiary Views on Cash and In-Kind Payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme

creativeworkseries.issn1564-698X
dc.contributor.authorHirvonen, Kalle
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, John
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-01T19:58:19Z
dc.date.available2024-01-01T19:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-24
dc.description.abstractEconomists often default to the assumption that cash is always preferable to an in-kind transfer. Do beneficiaries feel the same way? This paper addresses this issue using longitudinal household data from Ethiopia, where a large-scale social safety net intervention (PSNP) operates. Even though most payments are made in cash, and even though the (temporal) transaction costs associated with food payments are higher than payments received as cash, most beneficiaries stated that they prefer their payments only or partly in food. Higher food prices induce shifts in stated preferences toward in-kind transfers. More food-secure households, those closer to food markets and to financial services are more likely to prefer cash. Though shifts occur, the stated preference for food is dominant: In no year do more than 17 percent of households prefer only cash. There is suggestive evidence that stated preferences for food are also driven by self-control concerns.en
dc.identifier.citationThe World Bank Economic Review
dc.identifier.doi10.1596/40805
dc.identifier.issn0258-6770 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1564-698X (online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/40805
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublished by Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorld Bank Economic Review
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holderWorld Bank
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/
dc.subjectSOCIAL PROTECTION
dc.subjectFOOD TRANSFERS
dc.subjectCASH TRANSFERS
dc.subjectETHIOPIA
dc.subjectPSNP
dc.titleBeneficiary Views on Cash and In-Kind Paymentsen
dc.title.subtitleEvidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programmeen
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
okr.associatedcontenthttps://academic.oup.com/wber/article/35/2/398/5754024 Journal website (version of record)
okr.crossref.titleBeneficiary Views on Cash and In-Kind Payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme
okr.date.disclosure2020-02-24
okr.doctypePublications & Research
okr.doctypePublications & Research::Journal Article
okr.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaa002
okr.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1596/40805
okr.language.supporteden
okr.pagenumber398–413
okr.peerreviewAcademic Peer Review
okr.region.administrativeAfrica Eastern and Southern (AFE)
okr.region.countryEthiopia
okr.topicFinance and Financial Sector Development::Payment Systems & Infrastructure
okr.topicPoverty Reduction::Conditional Cash Transfers
okr.topicSocial Protections and Labor::Safety Nets and Transfers
okr.volume35 (2)
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublicationd521bf81-b3df-4cd0-914b-c88842ba5a68
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd521bf81-b3df-4cd0-914b-c88842ba5a68
relation.isJournalOfPublicationc41eae2f-cf94-449d-86b7-f062aebe893f
relation.isJournalVolumeOfPublication3a13adfa-b971-4f6d-9aaa-21ba96efc218
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
lhaa002.pdf
Size:
361.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections