Publication: In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
dc.contributor.author | Walsh, Barry | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-19T10:24:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-19T10:24:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-06-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | The World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID) and other donors have long been engaged in legal and judicial reform in sub-Saharan Africa in such areas as legal drafting, strengthening court administration, judicial training, and the empowerment of citizens through a better understanding of the legal system. This has often been done on an ad hoc basis with only limited review of other reform efforts in the region. In order to foster a more responsive approach to justice sector development programs, a collection of case studies was commissioned. One of the more daunting tasks was identifying notable justice sector developments or reforms, which offered specific impacts and which could be examined through both a desk review and field research. Independent of the funding source, the evidence base was not only limited but revealed a need for donors themselves to invest in better data collection, which could then be analyzed and measured against benchmarks or objectives such as improved access to justice. There is a significant need to review and learn from experiences, including controversial ones, in Africa's justice sectors. These case studies are not homogenous largely because their subjects vary and span a wide array of developments that reflect the realities of the region. Each story stands alone and is in no particular order. In the final chapter, the conclusions offered in each story are digested into ideas for future actions. The collection also represents a modest range of stories and it is to be hoped that other cases will be identified and shared. A comparison of experiences of sector-wide programs (SWAPs), for example, could help both donors and governments enhance socio-economic impact. It should be noted that the emphasis in this report is on providing information about positive directions in justice sector development and the ways in which lessons learned might be applied to achieve greater impact in the future. The anticipated value of this collection is that some of the conclusions or actions may be taken up and used to contribute to improvements by those committed to improving the rule of law in sub-Saharan Africa and is in search of 'success'. | en |
dc.identifier | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101022003638 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/2912 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/2912 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | World Bank | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ABUSE | |
dc.subject | ABUSES | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO COURTS | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | ADJUDICATION | |
dc.subject | ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | ADR | |
dc.subject | ADVOCACY | |
dc.subject | ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | |
dc.subject | ARBITRATION | |
dc.subject | ARREST | |
dc.subject | AUTOMATION | |
dc.subject | BAIL | |
dc.subject | BAR ASSOCIATIONS | |
dc.subject | BASIC | |
dc.subject | BEST PRACTICE | |
dc.subject | BRIBE | |
dc.subject | BRIBES | |
dc.subject | CASE LAW | |
dc.subject | CASE MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | CIVIL COURTS | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | CODING | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL COURTS | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL LAW | |
dc.subject | COMMERCIAL LAWS | |
dc.subject | COMMUNITIES | |
dc.subject | COMMUNITY LEGAL EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | COMPLAINT | |
dc.subject | COMPLAINTS | |
dc.subject | COMPONENTS | |
dc.subject | COMPUTERS | |
dc.subject | CONFIDENCE | |
dc.subject | CONNECTIVITY | |
dc.subject | CORRUPT | |
dc.subject | CORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | COURT | |
dc.subject | COURT ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | COURT CASE MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | COURT DECISIONS | |
dc.subject | COURT DELAYS | |
dc.subject | COURT HEARINGS | |
dc.subject | COURT JUDGMENTS | |
dc.subject | COURT MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | COURT PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | COURT PROCEDURES | |
dc.subject | COURT PROCEEDINGS | |
dc.subject | COURT PROCESS | |
dc.subject | COURT RECORDS | |
dc.subject | COURT REFORM | |
dc.subject | COURT SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | COURTHOUSES | |
dc.subject | COURTS | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL CASES | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL COURTS | |
dc.subject | CRIMINAL JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | CUSTOMARY COURTS | |
dc.subject | DETAINEE | |
dc.subject | DETAINEES | |
dc.subject | DETENTION | |
dc.subject | DEVICES | |
dc.subject | DIGITAL | |
dc.subject | DISPUTE RESOLUTION | |
dc.subject | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | |
dc.subject | DUE PROCESS | |
dc.subject | ELECTRONIC INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | EMPOWERMENT | |
dc.subject | FAMILIES | |
dc.subject | GENDER | |
dc.subject | HARDWARE | |
dc.subject | HOME | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | INDIGENT LITIGANTS | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION PROCESSING | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | INITIATIVE | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES | |
dc.subject | INTEGRITY | |
dc.subject | INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE | |
dc.subject | INTERFACES | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL LAW | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | |
dc.subject | INVESTIGATION | |
dc.subject | IVR | |
dc.subject | JUDGE | |
dc.subject | JUDGES | |
dc.subject | JUDGMENTS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL CORRUPTION | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL OFFICERS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL REFORM | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | JUDICIAL TRAINING | |
dc.subject | JUDICIARIES | |
dc.subject | JUDICIARY | |
dc.subject | JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | JUVENILE OFFENDERS | |
dc.subject | KIOSKS | |
dc.subject | LAWS | |
dc.subject | LAWYER | |
dc.subject | LAWYERS | |
dc.subject | LEADERSHIP | |
dc.subject | LEGAL AID | |
dc.subject | LEGAL ASSISTANCE | |
dc.subject | LEGAL COUNSEL | |
dc.subject | LEGAL DISPUTES | |
dc.subject | LEGAL EDUCATION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL LITERACY | |
dc.subject | LEGAL PROFESSION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL REPRESENTATION | |
dc.subject | LEGAL SERVICES | |
dc.subject | LEGAL TRAINING | |
dc.subject | LITERACY | |
dc.subject | LITIGATION | |
dc.subject | MAGISTRATES | |
dc.subject | MEDIA | |
dc.subject | MEDIATION | |
dc.subject | MEDIATORS | |
dc.subject | NEW TECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | OFFENCES | |
dc.subject | OFFENDER | |
dc.subject | OFFENDERS | |
dc.subject | PARALEGAL SERVICES | |
dc.subject | PATRONAGE | |
dc.subject | PLEADING | |
dc.subject | POLICE | |
dc.subject | POLICE OFFICERS | |
dc.subject | POLICING | |
dc.subject | PRISON | |
dc.subject | PRISON ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | PRISON GUARDS | |
dc.subject | PRISON OVERCROWDING | |
dc.subject | PRISONER | |
dc.subject | PRISONERS | |
dc.subject | PRISONS | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE LAW | |
dc.subject | PROGRAMMING | |
dc.subject | PROSECUTION | |
dc.subject | PROSECUTIONS | |
dc.subject | PROSECUTOR | |
dc.subject | PROSECUTORS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC DEFENDERS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC FUNDS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | PUBLISHING | |
dc.subject | QUALITY OF JUSTICE | |
dc.subject | REMEDIES | |
dc.subject | RIGHTS OF ACCUSED | |
dc.subject | RULE OF LAW | |
dc.subject | SENTENCES | |
dc.subject | SERVERS | |
dc.subject | SERVICE DELIVERY | |
dc.subject | SPREADSHEETS | |
dc.subject | STATE COURTS | |
dc.subject | SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE | |
dc.subject | TRAINING JUDGES | |
dc.subject | TRANSPARENCY | |
dc.subject | TRIAL | |
dc.subject | TRIALS | |
dc.subject | TRIBUNALS | |
dc.subject | WEBSITE | |
dc.subject | WEBSITES | |
dc.subject | WILL | |
dc.subject | WIRELESS | |
dc.subject | WITNESS | |
dc.subject | WITNESSES | |
dc.subject | WORD PROCESSING | |
dc.title | In Search of Success : Case Studies in Justice Sector Development in Sub-Saharan Africa | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Jobs | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Gender | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2010-10-21 | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-05-07T11:30:09.343835Z | |
okr.doctype | Economic & Sector Work::Law and Justice Study | |
okr.docurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000334955_20101022003638 | |
okr.globalpractice | Governance | |
okr.globalpractice | Trade and Competitiveness | |
okr.guid | 291991468009961030 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000334955_20101022003638 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 12892883 | |
okr.identifier.report | 57445 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/10/22/000334955_20101022003638/Rendered/PDF/574450ESW0P1121n0Africa010June02010.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | Africa | |
okr.topic | Legal Institutions of the Market Economy | |
okr.topic | Technology Industry | |
okr.topic | Gender::Gender and Law | |
okr.topic | Law and Development::Judicial System Reform | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures | |
okr.topic | Industry | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Development | |
okr.unit | Public Sector Reform & Capacity (AFTPR) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1