Publication: The Australian Government's Performance Framework
dc.contributor.author | Mackay, Keith | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-27T17:00:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-27T17:00:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | There has long been a keen interest from countries around the world in Australia's experience in creating an evaluation system to support evidence-based decision making and performance-based budgeting. Australia's evaluation system lasted from 1987 to 1997, and during that time it was used to systematically evaluate all government programs every three to five years; these evaluation findings were used heavily by officials, ministers and the cabinet in the annual budget process. The uses of these findings included the policy advice prepared by departments including the preparation of ministers' new policy proposals and departments' savings options submitted to the cabinet for its consideration. More importantly, these findings were highly influential on the cabinet's ultimate policy decisions. Finally, evaluation findings were also used widely within line departments in support of their ongoing management. This paper updates two previous World Bank papers that reviewed the Australian experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and other performance-related initiatives. These papers (Mackay 1998, 2004) focused on the first two time periods addressed in this paper. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/The-Australian-governments-performance-framework | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/27350 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/27350 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ECD Working Paper Series;No. 25 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo | |
dc.subject | ACCOUNTABILITY | |
dc.subject | ACCOUNTING | |
dc.subject | AUDITOR | |
dc.subject | AUDITS | |
dc.subject | BANKS | |
dc.subject | BEST PRACTICE | |
dc.subject | BROADBAND | |
dc.subject | BROADBAND NETWORK | |
dc.subject | BUDGET REVIEW | |
dc.subject | CABINET | |
dc.subject | CAPABILITIES | |
dc.subject | CASH FLOWS | |
dc.subject | CIVIL SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | COALITION GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | COMMODITIES | |
dc.subject | COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE | |
dc.subject | CONFIDENCE | |
dc.subject | COPYRIGHT | |
dc.subject | CORPORATE CULTURE | |
dc.subject | DECISION MAKING | |
dc.subject | DELIVERY OF PRODUCTS | |
dc.subject | DEMOCRACY | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC COOPERATION | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
dc.subject | ELECTION | |
dc.subject | EVALUATION ACTIVITIES | |
dc.subject | EVALUATION CAPACITY | |
dc.subject | EVALUATION METHODOLOGY | |
dc.subject | EVALUATION RESULTS | |
dc.subject | EVALUATORS | |
dc.subject | EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | FEDERAL GOVERNMENT | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | FLEXIBILITY | |
dc.subject | GDP | |
dc.subject | GOOD GOVERNANCE | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT MINISTERS | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT POLICY | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT SERVICE | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT SERVICES | |
dc.subject | GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT | |
dc.subject | HOUSE OF REVIEW | |
dc.subject | ICT | |
dc.subject | INCOME | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | INITIATIVE | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION POLICY | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTION | |
dc.subject | INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | INVESTIGATION | |
dc.subject | LEADERSHIP | |
dc.subject | LEARNING | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATION | |
dc.subject | LEGISLATIVE BODIES | |
dc.subject | LIVING STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | LONGITUDINAL DATA | |
dc.subject | LONGITUDINAL DATA SETS | |
dc.subject | MATERIAL | |
dc.subject | MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT | |
dc.subject | MINISTER | |
dc.subject | MINISTERS | |
dc.subject | NECESSARY SKILLS | |
dc.subject | NEGOTIATION | |
dc.subject | OPERATING ENVIRONMENT | |
dc.subject | OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY | |
dc.subject | OUTSOURCING | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENT | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTARIANS | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES | |
dc.subject | PARLIAMENTS | |
dc.subject | PENSIONS | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE INDICATORS | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE MEASURES | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE MONITORING | |
dc.subject | POLICE | |
dc.subject | POLICY FORMULATION | |
dc.subject | POLICY ISSUES | |
dc.subject | POLICY MAKERS | |
dc.subject | POLICY MAKING | |
dc.subject | POLICY OPTIONS | |
dc.subject | POLITICAL PARTY | |
dc.subject | PORTFOLIOS | |
dc.subject | PRIME MINISTER | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE SECTOR | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE SECTORS | |
dc.subject | PROCUREMENT | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | PROFESSIONAL STAFF | |
dc.subject | PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS | |
dc.subject | PROGRAM EVALUATION | |
dc.subject | PROGRAM INTERVENTIONS | |
dc.subject | PROGRAMS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SERVANTS | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SERVICE | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SERVICES | |
dc.subject | QUALITATIVE EVALUATION | |
dc.subject | REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT | |
dc.subject | REPRESENTATIVES | |
dc.subject | RESULT | |
dc.subject | RETENTION | |
dc.subject | RISK FACTORS | |
dc.subject | SERVICE DELIVERY | |
dc.subject | SERVICE QUALITY | |
dc.subject | STATE GOVERNMENTS | |
dc.subject | STRUCTURAL REFORMS | |
dc.subject | TARGETS | |
dc.subject | TELEPHONE | |
dc.subject | TIME FRAME | |
dc.subject | TIME PERIODS | |
dc.subject | TRAINING COURSE | |
dc.subject | TRANSFER PAYMENTS | |
dc.subject | TRANSPARENCY | |
dc.subject | USER | |
dc.subject | USES | |
dc.subject | WEB | |
dc.subject | WEB SITE | |
dc.subject | WEB TRAFFIC | |
dc.subject | WESTMINSTER SYSTEMS | |
dc.title | The Australian Government's Performance Framework | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.type | Document de travail | fr |
dc.type | Documento de trabajo | es |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2011-11-04 | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-04-14T12:28:53.964171Z | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/The-Australian-governments-performance-framework | |
okr.guid | 751861468212700535 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000333037_20111114235952 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 15473249 | |
okr.identifier.report | 65410 | |
okr.imported | true | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/751861468212700535/pdf/654100NWP0250a0C0disclosed011040110.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | East Asia and Pacific | |
okr.region.country | Australia | |
okr.topic | Poverty Reduction::Poverty Monitoring & Analysis | |
okr.topic | Law and Development::Corruption & Anticorruption Law | |
okr.topic | Public Sector Development::Public Sector Management and Reform | |
okr.topic | Governance::Governance and the Financial Sector | |
okr.topic | Governance::International Governmental Organizations | |
okr.topic | Governance::National Governance |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1