Publication: Beyond the Budget Fiscal Policy for Growth and Jobs: A Public Finance Review for Kenya
Loading...
Date
2025-06-04
ISSN
Published
2025-06-04
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
This public finance review (PFR) for Kenya aims both to ensure that every tax shilling benefits the Kenyan taxpayer and to inform the development of a fiscal policy that fosters job creation, poverty reduction, and equity. This PFR explores policy measures that could reduce Kenya’s debt-to- gross domestic product (GDP) ratio by about one-third within 10 years, returning the country to a position closer to its debt level of the 2010s, when the debt buildup began. This scenario takes into consideration increasing economic growth, real wages, and consumption across society. Under this scenario, it is estimated that Kenya’s debt-to-GDP ratio will fall to about 44 percent of GDP by 2035, close to the mid-2010s figure. Real wages and consumption can rise by about 4 percent if all reforms are implemented, and GDP growth and labor productivity by 7.1 and 6.4 percent respectively. The current fiscal situation reflects two underlying constraints. This PFR recommends revenue policies focused on enhancing the efficiency and equity of the tax system while reducing tax exemptions and distortions that further narrow the tax base and repress growth. In certain areas, especially leasehold rents and property taxation, there are clear opportunities to raise additional revenues. While land- and property-based taxes are generally non-distortionary and have the capacity to provide stable, predictable long-term revenues, they are administratively complex and require significant upfront and notable ongoing investments in systems and training. They also rely on a commitment to enforce nonpayment. In addition, the current property tax system in Kenya will benefit from legislative reform, which has a significant lead time and no guarantee of success. Looking beyond the budget, by implementing fiscal, governance, and structural reforms, Kenya can achieve fiscal sustainability while creating jobs and generating services. This PFR provides a range of policy options for the country to achieve these outcomes in the shorter and longer term.
Link to Data Set
Citation
“World Bank. 2025. Beyond the Budget Fiscal Policy for Growth and Jobs: A Public Finance Review for Kenya. © World Bank Group. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/43291 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO.”
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Citations
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication Albania Public Finance Review : Part 1. Toward a Sustainable Fiscal Policy for Growth(Washington, DC, 2014-01)Albania's rapid growth in the decade up to the 2008 global financial crisis propelled it to middle-income status and helped to reduce poverty. The global financial crisis in 2008 slammed the brakes on Albania's largely domestic-demand-driven growth. The government has accumulated sizable arrears in payments for public works and value-added tax (VAT) refunds. In a baseline scenario of no policy reforms, Albania's public debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio is projected to reach 73.5 percent in 2015 and stay above 72 percent over the medium term. Empirical evidence confirms that high public debt depresses economic activity and significantly increases the probability of default. This report examines closely the opportunities for fiscal consolidation on both the revenue and expenditure sides. Combined effect of structural reforms will reduce Albania's public debt to GDP ratio significantly over the medium term. It can in parallel rebalance its capital spending, particularly in transport, toward maintenance to support growth. Albania needs to strengthen its institutions to reinforce financial discipline and strengthen fiscal policy. Institutional reforms are particularly needed with regard to public financial management (PFM) and introducing a fiscal rule to anchor policy over the medium term.Publication Linking Fiscal Policy and Growth in PER Reports : An Operational Framework for Low-Income Countries(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2009-03)This note describes a framework for linking fiscal policy and growth issues in low-income countries. The framework has been developed in the context of a recently, completed Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review (PEMFAR) report in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. The note describes first the framework and then illustrates its application to fiscal reform and growth prospects in the context of Haiti. The note concludes by laying out an agenda for developing this framework further, ideally to facilitate use of this framework in preparing more Public Expenditure Reviews (PERs) and elaborating medium-term budget frameworks.Publication Uganda - Fiscal Policy for Growth : Public Expenditure Review 2007, Volume 1. Executive Summary(Washington, DC, 2007-06-24)Uganda needs to increase infrastructure investments if impressive growth is to continue. But the Budget is showing increasing signs of stress from expenditure pressures and fiscal tightening. Recent increases in employee costs in central Government functions of public administration, justice law and order, defense, prisons and police have deteriorated the composition of the Budget from the perspective of growth. In common with global experience in tight fiscal circumstances, public infrastructure spending is getting squeezed. These expenditure trends suggest a further squeeze on infrastructure and maintenance is inevitable, in which case growth could slow down. This report concerns how should Uganda respond to these fiscal challenges? Whereas there is scope for prudent new concessional borrowing for infrastructure, disbursement rates in infrastructure projects are too low, making it a priority to address constraints to effective spending. As part of a fiscal strategy for growth, Uganda needs in the short to medium-term to rapidly improve revenue performance without taxing key growth sectors, and to shift the composition of spending towards infrastructure. A compositional shift will require deep public sector reforms, early action on postponed reforms to public administration, and a working program to reduce waste and increase the efficiency of public expenditures, including in Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF) priority sectors and agencies. A reduction in waste and an increase in public sector efficiency will ultimately require more accountability for the delivery of quality public services than is evident in Uganda today. It will also require a much more systematic effort by spending ministries and agencies: a more structured and a much more strategic approach to public service efficiency from the ministry of finance could be built into budget framework papers as well as preparation of the next Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP).Publication Uganda - Fiscal Policy for Growth : Public Expenditure Review 2007, Volume 2. Main Report(Washington, DC, 2007-06-24)Uganda needs to increase infrastructure investments if impressive growth is to continue. But the Budget is showing increasing signs of stress from expenditure pressures and fiscal tightening. Recent increases in employee costs in central Government functions of public administration, justice law and order, defense, prisons and police have deteriorated the composition of the Budget from the perspective of growth. In common with global experience in tight fiscal circumstances, public infrastructure spending is getting squeezed. These expenditure trends suggest a further squeeze on infrastructure and maintenance is inevitable, in which case growth could slow down. This report concerns how should Uganda respond to these fiscal challenges? Whereas there is scope for prudent new concessional borrowing for infrastructure, disbursement rates in infrastructure projects are too low, making it a priority to address constraints to effective spending. As part of a fiscal strategy for growth, Uganda needs in the short to medium-term to rapidly improve revenue performance without taxing key growth sectors, and to shift the composition of spending towards infrastructure. A compositional shift will require deep public sector reforms, early action on postponed reforms to public administration, and a working program to reduce waste and increase the efficiency of public expenditures, including in Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF) priority sectors and agencies. A reduction in waste and an increase in public sector efficiency will ultimately require more accountability for the delivery of quality public services than is evident in Uganda today. It will also require a much more systematic effort by spending ministries and agencies: a more structured and a much more strategic approach to public service efficiency from the ministry of finance could be built into budget framework papers as well as preparation of the next Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP).Publication Reforms under Fiscal Stress : A Policy Note on the Priorities for Fiscal and Budget Reform in Nepal(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2012)This note, first of the several on fiscal management and policy option notes planned, provides a concise assessment of the achievements to date of the ongoing reforms to budget management in Nepal and concludes with some guidance on the key focus areas of fiscal policy and expenditure management over the near and medium term. It is a selective assessment that looks at major aspects of the policy and budget process with a view to identifying areas for strategic focus, rather than a detailed rendering of the reforms. The note highlights the fiscal challenges that are assuming increasing prominence and which must be addressed by policy decisions and medium term reforms. While recognizing the uniqueness of Nepal's initial conditions, capacities and current security related challenges, the note takes account of international experience in implementing such reforms. The note starts with the economic and political background. The second section reviews fiscal trends and outlines issues to be considered by a fiscal strategy. The third section discusses institutional issues to strengthen the budget process.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
No results found.