Publication: FY 2022 Bangladesh Country Opinion Survey Report
Loading...
Date
2022-05
ISSN
Published
2022-05
Author(s)
Editor(s)
Abstract
The Country Opinion Survey in Bangladesh assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Bangladesh perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Bangladesh on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in Bangladesh; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Bangladesh; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Bangladesh; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in Bangladesh.
Link to Data Set
Citation
âWorld Bank Group. 2022. FY 2022 Bangladesh Country Opinion Survey Report. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38533 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.â
Associated URLs
Associated content
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by metadata.
Publication FY 2022 China Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022-07)The Country Opinion Survey in China assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in China perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in China on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in China; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in China; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in China; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in China.Publication FY 2022 Cameroon Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022-06)The Country Opinion Survey in Cameroon assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Cameroon perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Cameroon on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in Cameroon; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Cameroon; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Cameroon; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in Cameroon.Publication FY 2022 Sierra Leone Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022-06)The Country Opinion Survey in Sierra Leone assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Sierra Leone perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Sierra Leone on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in Sierra Leone; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Sierra Leone; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Sierra Leone; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in Sierra Leone.Publication FY 2022 Bolivia Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022-02)The Country Opinion Survey in Bolivia assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Bolivia perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Bolivia on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in Bolivia; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Bolivia; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Bolivia; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in Bolivia.Publication FY 2022 Botswana Country Opinion Survey Report(Washington, DC: World Bank, 2022-07)The Country Opinion Survey in Botswana assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Botswana perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Botswana on: (1) their views regarding the general environment in Botswana; (2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Botswana; (3) overall impressions of the WBGâs effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Botswana; and (4) their perceptions of the WBGâs future role in Botswana.
Users also downloaded
Showing related downloaded files
Publication Poverty Traps, Aid, and Growth(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005-06)The authors examine the empirical evidence in support of the poverty trap view of underdevelopment. They calibrate simple aggregate growth models in which poverty traps can arise due to either low saving or low technology at low levels of development. They then use these models to assess the empirical relevance of poverty traps and their consequences for policy. The authors find little evidence of the existence of poverty traps based on these two broad mechanisms. When put to the task of explaining the persistence of low income in African countries, the models require either unreasonable values for key parameters, or else generate counterfactual predictions regarding the relations between key variables. These results call into question the view that a large scaling-up of aid to the poorest countries is a necessary condition for sharp and sustained increases in growth.Publication World Bank-Civil Society Engagement(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2013)World Bank relations with civil society continued to expand throughout the institution during 2010â12. This evolution was experienced across the spectrum of the "engagement continuum," which includes information disclosure, policy dialogue, strategy consultations, operational collaboration, and institutional partnerships.Publication World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies(Washington, DC : World Bank, 2023-04-25)Migration is a development challenge. About 184 million peopleâ2.3 percent of the worldâs populationâlive outside of their country of nationality. Almost half of them are in low- and middle-income countries. But what lies ahead? As the world struggles to cope with global economic imbalances, diverging demographic trends, and climate change, migration will become a necessity in the decades to come for countries at all levels of income. If managed well, migration can be a force for prosperity and can help achieve the United Nationsâ Sustainable Development Goals. World Development Report 2023 proposes an innovative approach to maximize the development impacts of cross-border movements on both destination and origin countries and on migrants and refugees themselves. The framework it offers, drawn from labor economics and international law, rests on a âMatch and Motive Matrixâ that focuses on two factors: how closely migrantsâ skills and attributes match the needs of destination countries and what motives underlie their movements. This approach enables policy makers to distinguish between different types of movements and to design migration policies for each. International cooperation will be critical to the effective management of migration.Publication Corporate Market Power in Romania(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2020-12)This paper explores firm-level heterogeneity to identify the underlying drivers of market power trends in Romania and the implications for competition and economic growth. The results show that the (sales-weighted) average markup in Romania increased by around 15 percent between 2008 and 2017. A key driving force behind this aggregate trend was the ability of a small fraction of firms -- the top decile firms in the markup distribution -- to increase their markups. These firms do not seem to follow the typical superstar firms' profile: they are smaller, less efficient, and less likely to invest in intangible assets than other firms in the markup distribution and overrepresented in less knowledge-intensive service sectors (for example, the retail and trade sector). This suggests that the increase in markups in Romania might be associated with an environment that is less conducive to competition. A decomposition exercise shows that the increase in aggregate markups has been driven mostly by incumbents rather than new entrants and exiting firms, which could be interpreted as a sign of consolidation of market power among existing firms. The paper also finds that certain firm characteristics matter to explain differences in markup performance: size, age, research and development profile, export propensity, location, and especially ownership. Further, the paper shows that additional productivity dividends are associated with increased competition in Romania. Overall, these findings illustrate potential policy angles that need to be tackled to enhance market contestability and boost productivity growth, such as addressing regulations that restrict entry and rivalry in the retail trade sector, which concentrates a substantial proportion of high-markup firms, as well as promoting competitive neutrality across markets where public and private actors compete.Publication Trade Credit(World Bank, Washington, DC, 2023-06-25)Trade credit remains an important source of finance for firms in developing countries and many firms in developed countries, especially those that are young, small, or informationally opaque for other reasons. This paper summarizes the literature and explains the pervasiveness of trade credit, detailing its potential advantages over formal credit in terms of the information that buyers and sellers have about each other and their ability to monitor one another. Because it requires less formal contract enforcement, trade credit can be especially relevant where the rule of law and the legal system are weak. At the same time, reliance on information from social networks and informal institutional arrangements limits the scale of trade credit, and thus moderate improvements to formal enforcement can expand trade credit beyond social networks and enable customers to switch suppliers, which improves their credit terms. The patterns suggest a sweet spot or âGoldilocksâ region where mid-size firms and those in countries at middling levels of development tend to rely relatively more heavily on trade credit than others. Going forward, detailed data on the relationship between suppliers and customers are crucial to enable more direct tests of theoretical predictions regarding trade credit.