Publication:
Decentralizing Eligibility for a Federal Antipoverty Program
creativeworkseries.issn | 1564-698X | |
dc.contributor.author | Ravallion, Martin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-30T07:12:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-30T07:12:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-02-28 | |
dc.description.abstract | In theory, the informational advantage of decentralizing the eligibility criteria for a federal antipoverty program could come at a large cost to the program's performance in reaching the poor nationally. Whether this happens in practice depends on the size of the local-income effect on the eligibility cutoffs. China's Di Bao program provides a case study. Poorer municipalities adopt systematically lower thresholds—roughly negating intercity differences in need for the program and generating considerable horizontal inequity, so that poor families in rich cities fare better. The income effect is not strong enough to undermine the program's overall poverty impact; other factors, including incomplete coverage of those eligible, appear to matter more. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | World Bank Economic Review | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1564-698X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4492 | |
dc.publisher | World Bank | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | World Bank Economic Review | |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo | |
dc.subject | absolute poverty | |
dc.subject | community groups | |
dc.subject | fiscal constraints | |
dc.subject | household survey | |
dc.subject | impact on poverty | |
dc.subject | income | |
dc.subject | income inequality | |
dc.subject | lack of information | |
dc.subject | political influence | |
dc.subject | poor | |
dc.subject | poor areas | |
dc.subject | poor families | |
dc.subject | poor people | |
dc.subject | poverty impact | |
dc.subject | poverty line | |
dc.subject | public spending | |
dc.subject | redistributive policies | |
dc.subject | social policies | |
dc.subject | social spending | |
dc.subject | targeting | |
dc.title | Decentralizing Eligibility for a Federal Antipoverty Program | en |
dc.title.alternative | A Case Study for China | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.type | Article de journal | fr |
dc.type | Artículo de revista | es |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.doctype | Journal Article | |
okr.globalpractice | Macroeconomics and Fiscal Management | |
okr.globalpractice | Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience | |
okr.globalpractice | Poverty | |
okr.globalpractice | Health, Nutrition, and Population | |
okr.identifier.report | 1 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pagenumber | 1 | |
okr.pagenumber | 30 | |
okr.pdfurl | wber_23_1_1.pdf | en |
okr.peerreview | Academic Peer Review | |
okr.region.administrative | East Asia and Pacific | |
okr.region.country | China | |
okr.topic | Rural Development | |
okr.topic | Macroeconomics and Economic Growth | |
okr.topic | Health, Nutrition and Population | |
okr.topic | Poverty Reduction :: Rural Poverty Reduction | |
okr.topic | Poverty Reduction :: Inequality | |
okr.topic | Services and Transfers to Poor | |
okr.topic | Poverty Monitoring and Analysis | |
okr.topic | Economic Theory and Research | |
okr.topic | Health Systems Development and Reform | |
okr.volume | 23 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d53ceb26-d2be-50fc-a6b3-5bd777691c9c | |
relation.isJournalIssueOfPublication | 765afeee-ef91-4a3a-8298-e46e98d8ca0a | |
relation.isJournalOfPublication | c41eae2f-cf94-449d-86b7-f062aebe893f | |
relation.isJournalVolumeOfPublication | 2a48d5d8-d550-47d9-ae0e-29ef4f0212f2 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1