Publication: Evaluating Workfare When the Work Is Unpleasant : Evidence for India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
dc.contributor.author | Lagrange, Arthur Alik | |
dc.contributor.author | Ravallion, Martin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-04T21:55:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-04T21:55:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | Prevailing practices in evaluating workfare programs have ignored the disutility of the type of work done, with theoretically ambiguous implications for the impacts on poverty. In the case of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, past assessments have relied solely on household consumption per person as the measure of economic welfare. The paper generalizes this measure to allow for the disutility of casual manual work. The new measure is calibrated to the distribution of the preference parameters implied by maximization of an idiosyncratic welfare function assuming that there is no rationing of the available work. The adjustment implies a substantially more "poor-poor" incidence of participation in the scheme than suggested by past methods. However, the overall impacts on poverty are lower, although still positive. The main conclusions are robust to a wide range of alternative parameter values and to allowing for involuntary unemployment using a sample of (self-declared) un-rationed workers. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/11/16981158/evaluating-workfare-work-unpleasant-evidence-indias-national-rural-employment-guarantee-scheme | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-6272 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/12113 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | World Bank, Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Research Working Paper; No. 6272 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ADULT MALE | |
dc.subject | ANTI-POVERTY | |
dc.subject | ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAM | |
dc.subject | BASE YEAR | |
dc.subject | CHANGES IN POVERTY | |
dc.subject | CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE | |
dc.subject | DAILY WAGE | |
dc.subject | DECOMPOSABLE POVERTY | |
dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS | |
dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT POLICY | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME | |
dc.subject | FAMINE | |
dc.subject | FARM PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | FARMER | |
dc.subject | FUNCTIONAL FORMS | |
dc.subject | GINI COEFFICIENT | |
dc.subject | GROSS WAGES | |
dc.subject | HIGH WAGE | |
dc.subject | HIGHER INEQUALITY | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SIZE | |
dc.subject | HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS | |
dc.subject | IMPACT ON POVERTY | |
dc.subject | INCIDENCE OF POVERTY | |
dc.subject | INCOME | |
dc.subject | INCOME DISTRIBUTION | |
dc.subject | INCOME GAINS | |
dc.subject | INEQUALITY | |
dc.subject | INEQUALITY MEASURES | |
dc.subject | INVOLUNTARY UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | JOBS | |
dc.subject | LABOR MARKETS | |
dc.subject | LABOR SUPPLY | |
dc.subject | LABOUR | |
dc.subject | LORENZ CURVE | |
dc.subject | MANUAL LABOR | |
dc.subject | MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY | |
dc.subject | MINIMUM WAGE | |
dc.subject | POOR | |
dc.subject | POOR COUNTRIES | |
dc.subject | POOR PEOPLE | |
dc.subject | POORER PEOPLE | |
dc.subject | POVERTY GAP | |
dc.subject | POVERTY IMPACT | |
dc.subject | POVERTY LINE | |
dc.subject | POVERTY LINES | |
dc.subject | POVERTY MEASURES | |
dc.subject | POVERTY PROGRAMS | |
dc.subject | POVERTY RATE | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE MARKET | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE SECTOR | |
dc.subject | PSE | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC SPENDING | |
dc.subject | PUBLIC WORKS | |
dc.subject | REAL WAGE | |
dc.subject | REGULAR JOB | |
dc.subject | RIGHT TO WORK | |
dc.subject | RURAL | |
dc.subject | RURAL AREAS | |
dc.subject | RURAL EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | RURAL HOUSEHOLDS | |
dc.subject | RURAL LABOR | |
dc.subject | RURAL LABOR MARKET | |
dc.subject | RURAL POOR | |
dc.subject | RURAL POVERTY | |
dc.subject | RURAL PUBLIC | |
dc.subject | SELF-EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | SOCIAL PROGRAMS | |
dc.subject | SQUARED POVERTY GAP INDEX | |
dc.subject | SUPPLIERS | |
dc.subject | TARGETING | |
dc.subject | TOTAL WAGES | |
dc.subject | TRANSFER BENEFITS | |
dc.subject | UNEMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | WAGE INCREASE | |
dc.subject | WAGE RATE | |
dc.subject | WAGES | |
dc.subject | WEALTH | |
dc.subject | WELFARE INDICATOR | |
dc.subject | WELFARE MEASURE | |
dc.subject | WORKERS | |
dc.subject | WORKING DAYS | |
dc.title | Evaluating Workfare When the Work Is Unpleasant : Evidence for India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Jobs | |
okr.crossref.title | Evaluating Workfare When the Work is Unpleasant: Evidence for India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2012-11-01 | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-04-10T12:13:23.790508Z | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::Policy Research Working Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/11/16981158/evaluating-workfare-work-unpleasant-evidence-indias-national-rural-employment-guarantee-scheme | |
okr.globalpractice | Macroeconomics and Fiscal Management | |
okr.globalpractice | Social Protection and Labor | |
okr.globalpractice | Poverty | |
okr.guid | 154421468259466159 | |
okr.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-6272 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000158349_20121120153304 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 16981158 | |
okr.identifier.report | WPS6272 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.region.administrative | South Asia | |
okr.region.country | India | |
okr.sector | Health and other social services :: Other social services | |
okr.theme | Economic management :: Analysis of economic growth | |
okr.theme | Social protection and risk management :: Poverty strategy, analysis and monitoring | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor::Labor Markets | |
okr.topic | Services & Transfers to Poor | |
okr.topic | Poverty Reduction::Rural Poverty Reduction | |
okr.topic | Economic Theory & Research | |
okr.topic | Macroeconomics and Economic Growth | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d53ceb26-d2be-50fc-a6b3-5bd777691c9c | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d53ceb26-d2be-50fc-a6b3-5bd777691c9c | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1