Publication: Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings

Thumbnail Image
Files in English
English PDF (639.62 KB)
666 downloads

English Text (357.33 KB)
5,419 downloads
Date
2010-06-30
ISSN
Published
2010-06-30
Author(s)
World Bank
Abstract
The Turkish Ministry of Justice has identified the existing system of expert witnesses as an obstacle to the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial services. The 2009 judicial reform strategy and the judicial reform action plan call for a comparative study analyzing the experience in other countries to provide input into the policy debate in Turkey. This study provides descriptions and analyses of approaches to the use of expert opinions in civil, criminal, and administrative court proceedings in France, Germany, Italy, and the United States. It focuses on five key areas: access to the function of expert, execution of an expert opinion, the opinion and its use in evidence, remuneration, and liability.
Link to Data Set
Citation
World Bank. 2010. Comparative Study on Expert Witnesses in Court Proceedings. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2991 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Report Series
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Associated URLs
Associated content
Citations