Publication: Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China) : Catching Up Experiences
dc.contributor.author | Chandra, V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Osorio-Rodarte , I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Primo Braga, C. A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-19T19:13:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-19T19:13:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-10-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper tests a neo-Schumpeterian model with industry-level data to analyze how Brazil, India, and China are catching up with South Korea s technological frontier in a globalized world. The paper validates Aghion et al. s inverted-U hypothesis that industries that are closer to the technological frontier innovate to escape competition while longer distances discourage innovating. It suggests that for effective catching up, distance-shortening (or innovation-enhancing) policies may be a necessary complement to liberalization. South Korea and China combined a variety of distance-shortening policies with financial subsidies to promote high tech industries and an export-led growth strategy. Post-liberalization, they leveraged swift competition to spur catch-up. In comparison, Brazil, which was as rich as South Korea, and India, which was as rich as China in 1980, are catching up more slowly. Import-substitution industrialization strategies saddled Brazil and India with a large anti-export bias, and unfocused attention to innovation-enhancing policies dampened global competitiveness. Post liberalization, many of their industries were too far behind the technological frontier to effectively benefit from competition. The catch-up experiences of Brazil, India, and China with South Korea illustrate that distance from the technological frontier matters and that the design of country-specific distance- shortening policies can be an important complement to trade liberalization in promoting catching up with richer countries. | en |
dc.identifier | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20091027140420 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-5101 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/4292 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 5101 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.holder | World Bank | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ANTITRUST | |
dc.subject | AUTOMOBILES | |
dc.subject | BANKING | |
dc.subject | BENCHMARK | |
dc.subject | BENCHMARKING | |
dc.subject | BUSINESS | |
dc.subject | CAPABILITIES | |
dc.subject | CAPABILITY | |
dc.subject | CHEMICAL | |
dc.subject | CLOSED ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | COLLABORATION | |
dc.subject | COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE | |
dc.subject | COMPETITION | |
dc.subject | COMPETITION POLICY | |
dc.subject | COMPETITIVE EDGE | |
dc.subject | COMPETITIVENESS | |
dc.subject | CONSULTANT | |
dc.subject | CONTENT | |
dc.subject | COVARIANCE MATRIX | |
dc.subject | CREDIT | |
dc.subject | DATA | |
dc.subject | DATA LIMITATIONS | |
dc.subject | DATABASE | |
dc.subject | DEBT | |
dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | DEVELOPMENT POLICY | |
dc.subject | DISCUSSION | |
dc.subject | DRIVERS | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC GROWTH | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC INTEGRATION | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC RENTS | |
dc.subject | ECONOMIC THEORY | |
dc.subject | ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | EFFECTS | |
dc.subject | EFFICIENCY | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICAL SOURCE | |
dc.subject | ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY | |
dc.subject | EMPLOYMENT | |
dc.subject | EQUIPMENT | |
dc.subject | EXOGENOUS VARIABLES | |
dc.subject | EXPORTS | |
dc.subject | FINANCE | |
dc.subject | FINANCIAL CRISIS | |
dc.subject | FOREIGN COMPETITION | |
dc.subject | FOREIGN TRADE | |
dc.subject | GDP | |
dc.subject | GDP PER CAPITA | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL MARKET | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL MARKETS | |
dc.subject | GOODS | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT POLICIES | |
dc.subject | GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS | |
dc.subject | GROWTH RATE | |
dc.subject | GROWTH STRATEGY | |
dc.subject | GROWTH THEORY | |
dc.subject | HUMAN CAPITAL | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RESOURCE | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | HUMAN RESOURCES | |
dc.subject | IDEAS | |
dc.subject | INCENTIVES | |
dc.subject | INCOME | |
dc.subject | INCOME LEVELS | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRIALIZATION | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRY | |
dc.subject | INDUSTRY SCOREBOARD | |
dc.subject | INFORMATION | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION POLICIES | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION POLICY | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION STRATEGIES | |
dc.subject | INNOVATION STRATEGY | |
dc.subject | INNOVATIONS | |
dc.subject | INPUTS | |
dc.subject | INSTITUTIONS | |
dc.subject | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | |
dc.subject | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION | |
dc.subject | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | INTUITION | |
dc.subject | INVESTMENT | |
dc.subject | IRON | |
dc.subject | LABOR | |
dc.subject | LABOR FORCE | |
dc.subject | LABOR PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | LAGS | |
dc.subject | LAW | |
dc.subject | LEADING | |
dc.subject | LEARNING | |
dc.subject | LICENSE | |
dc.subject | MACROECONOMIC STABILITY | |
dc.subject | MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | MANUFACTURING | |
dc.subject | MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES | |
dc.subject | MARKET COMPETITION | |
dc.subject | MARKET ECONOMIES | |
dc.subject | MARKET PLACE | |
dc.subject | MARKET SHARE | |
dc.subject | MARKETS | |
dc.subject | MEMORY | |
dc.subject | MEMORY CHIPS | |
dc.subject | MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES | |
dc.subject | MONITORING | |
dc.subject | MONOPOLY | |
dc.subject | MONOPOLY RENTS | |
dc.subject | NATURAL RESOURCE | |
dc.subject | NETWORK | |
dc.subject | OPEN ACCESS | |
dc.subject | ORGANIZATIONS | |
dc.subject | OUTCOMES | |
dc.subject | PATENTS | |
dc.subject | PAYMENTS | |
dc.subject | PER CAPITA INCOME | |
dc.subject | PER CAPITA INCOMES | |
dc.subject | PETROLEUM REFINERIES | |
dc.subject | POLICIES | |
dc.subject | PRICE | |
dc.subject | PRICES | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE INVESTMENTS | |
dc.subject | PRIVATE SECTOR | |
dc.subject | PROCESS | |
dc.subject | PROCUREMENT | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTION | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH | |
dc.subject | PRODUCTS | |
dc.subject | PROFITS | |
dc.subject | PROPERTY RIGHTS | |
dc.subject | R&D | |
dc.subject | RENTS | |
dc.subject | RESEARCH | |
dc.subject | RESULT | |
dc.subject | RESULTS | |
dc.subject | RISK | |
dc.subject | SEEDING | |
dc.subject | SEMICONDUCTORS | |
dc.subject | SOFTWARE | |
dc.subject | STANDARDS | |
dc.subject | TARGET | |
dc.subject | TARIFF BARRIERS | |
dc.subject | TAX INCENTIVES | |
dc.subject | TAX SUBSIDIES | |
dc.subject | TAX SUBSIDY | |
dc.subject | TAXES | |
dc.subject | TECHNICAL SKILLS | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGIES | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGY | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | |
dc.subject | TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY | |
dc.subject | TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH | |
dc.subject | TRADE | |
dc.subject | TRADE BARRIERS | |
dc.subject | TRADE LIBERALIZATION | |
dc.subject | TRADE POLICIES | |
dc.subject | TRADE REFORMS | |
dc.subject | TRAINING | |
dc.subject | TRANSITION ECONOMIES | |
dc.subject | TRENDS | |
dc.subject | UNDERSTANDING | |
dc.subject | USES | |
dc.subject | VALUE | |
dc.subject | VALUE ADDED | |
dc.subject | VARIABLES | |
dc.subject | VARIETY | |
dc.subject | WEB | |
dc.subject | WORLD ECONOMY | |
dc.subject | WORLD TRADE | |
dc.title | Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China) : Catching Up Experiences | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Jobs | |
okr.crossref.title | Korea And The Bics (Brazil, India And China) : Catching Up Experiences | |
okr.date.doiregistration | 2025-04-10T12:01:48.058420Z | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::Policy Research Working Paper | |
okr.docurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20091027140420 | |
okr.globalpractice | Social Protection and Labor | |
okr.globalpractice | Water | |
okr.guid | 347611468272431570 | |
okr.identifier.doi | 10.1596/1813-9450-5101 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000158349_20091027140420 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 11266258 | |
okr.identifier.report | WPS5101 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2009/10/27/000158349_20091027140420/Rendered/PDF/WPS5101.pdf | en |
okr.region.country | China | |
okr.region.country | India | |
okr.region.country | Korea, Republic of | |
okr.region.country | Brazil | |
okr.topic | Social Protections and Labor::Labor Policies | |
okr.topic | Water Resources::Water and Industry | |
okr.unit | Development Research Group (DECRG) | |
okr.volume | 1 of 1 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 | |
relation.isSeriesOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 26e071dc-b0bf-409c-b982-df2970295c87 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1