Beath, AndrewChristia, FotiniEnikolopov, Ruben2012-12-072012-12-072012-07https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11950In areas afflicted by civil conflict, development projects can potentially serve an important counterinsurgency function by redressing grievances of marginalized groups and reducing violence. Using a large-scale randomized field experiment in Afghanistan, this paper explores whether the inclusion of villages in the country's largest development program alters perceptions of well-being, attitudes toward government, and violence in surrounding areas. The results indicate that the program generally has a positive effect on all three measures, but has no effects in areas with high levels of initial violence. These findings demonstrate that development programs can buttress government support and limit the onset of insurgencies in relatively secure areas, but that their effectiveness is more constrained in areas where insurgents are already active.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOACCESS TO SERVICESATTRITIONBALANCE OF POWERBARGAININGBLOCK GRANTSBULLETSCENTRAL GOVERNMENTCENTRAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALSCITIESCIVIL SOCIETYCIVIL WARCIVIL WARSCIVILIAN CASUALTIESCOMBATANTSCOMMODITYCOMMUNITIESCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCONFLICTCONFLICT RESOLUTIONCONFLICTSCOUNTERINSURGENCIESCOUNTERINSURGENCYCRISIS MANAGEMENTDATA NETWORKDEMOCRACYDESCRIPTIONDEVELOPMENT AIDDEVELOPMENT PROJECTDEVELOPMENT PROJECTSDISTRICTDISTRICT CENTERDISTRICT GOVERNORDISTRICTSECONOMIC BENEFITSECONOMIC CONDITIONSECONOMIC DIVERSITYECONOMICSELECTIONSELECTRICITYEXPENDITURESEXTERNALITIESFEMALEFEMALESFOREIGNERSFOUNDATIONSGENDERGENERAL EQUILIBRIUMGOVERNMENT LEGITIMACYHOUSEHOLDSHUMAN CAPITALINCOMEINSTITUTIONINSURANCEINTERNATIONAL BANKINTERNATIONAL DONORSINTERNATIONAL SECURITYINTERVENTIONSLABOR MARKETMANPOWERMARGINAL AREASMATERIALMEETINGMILITARY AIDMOTIVATIONNEIGHBORHOODONGOING APPLICATIONOPEN ACCESSPEACEPEACE RESEARCHPOLICEPOLICY ANALYSISPOLICY EVALUATIONPOLITICAL ECONOMYPROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONPROJECT SELECTIONPROTOCOLSPROVINCEPROVINCESPROVINCIAL CENTERSPROVINCIAL GOVERNORPROVINCIAL GOVERNORSPUBLIC ECONOMICSREBELRECONSTRUCTIONREHABILITATIONREMOTE VILLAGESRESOURCE ALLOCATIONRESULTRESULTSREVOLUTIONSROADROADSRURAL DEVELOPMENTSECURITY POLICYSETTLEMENTSHELTERSOCIAL BENEFITSSOCIAL DEVELOPMENTSOLDIERSSUB-NATIONALSUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTSUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTSTARGETSTERRORISMTIME PERIODSTRAINING COURSESUNEMPLOYEDUNEMPLOYMENTUNEMPLOYMENT RATESVILLAGEVILLAGE LEVELVILLAGESVIOLENCEWARWARSWEAPONWEBWinning Hearts and Minds through Development? Evidence from a Field Experiment in AfghanistanWorld Bank10.1596/1813-9450-6129