Heller, Katherinevan Wicklin III, WarrenKumagai, Saki2016-08-022016-08-022016-05https://hdl.handle.net/10986/24771This note provides guidance on how to use social accountability (SA) approaches in oil, gas, and mining projects, with particular emphasis on World Bank projects in the extractive industry (EI) sectors. It highlights some consequences of poor transparency and accountability in EI sectors and identifies opportunities for addressing these issues. It demonstrates how the use of SA approaches and tools can improve the implementation and outcomes of EI projects. Although the note is written primarily for a World Bank/International Finance Corporation (IFC) audience and project cycle, it is hoped that it will be a resource for government, industry, and civil society partners as well.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOFOCUS GROUPSDECISION-MAKING PROCESSESEXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIESADVOCACYLOCAL AUTHORITIESLOCAL CAPACITYPARTICIPANTSCONSULTATIONPARTICIPATION OF LOCAL COMMUNITIESCIVIL SOCIETY INVOLVEMENTCIVIL SOCIETIESCAPACITY DEVELOPMENTMERCURYTARGET GROUPSGOOD GOVERNANCECOMMUNITY SCORECARDSPREPARATIONCOMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVESSOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMSBUDGET LITERACYINCENTIVESCAPACITY BUILDINGBORROWERSSOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVESINSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURESCORRUPTIONAWARENESS RAISINGBENEFICIARIESOVERSIGHTMOBILIZATIONCIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONSCOMMUNITY PARTICIPATIONCITIZEN MONITORINGCREDIBILITYENABLING ENVIRONMENTPOVERTY REDUCTIONCOLLABORATIONAFFECTED PARTIESRIGHT TO INFORMATIONFISCAL POLICIESWORKPLACEPARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENTPARTICIPATORY BUDGETRELEVANCECIVIL SOCIETY CAPACITYBUDGET ALLOCATIONCITIZEN PARTICIPATIONCIVIL SOCIETYPOWER-HOLDERSDEMOCRACYPARTICIPATORY PLANNINGCOMMUNITY LEADERSBUDGET ANALYSISCIVIL SOCIETY GROUPLOCAL GOVERNMENTCIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONACCESSCIVIL SOCIETY GROUPSNEGOTIATIONSJOURNALISTSDATA ANALYSISSOCIAL DEVELOPMENTPROBLEM SOLVINGMARGINALIZED GROUPSGRANTSPROJECT DESIGNACCESS TO INFORMATIONGOVERNMENT SERVICESCONSENSUS APPROACHGRANTCOMMUNITY SCORECARDINTERVIEWSACCOUNTABILITYDEMANDS FOR TRANSPARENCYTRANSPARENCYINDEPENDENT AUDITORBEST PRACTICESBUDGET PROCESSPARTICIPATIONCITIZENS’ JURIESSURVEYCODES OF CONDUCTSTAKEHOLDERSCONSULTATIONSSOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITYPARTICIPATORY BUDGETINGWORKSHOPCIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATIONANTI-CORRUPTIONPUBLIC AWARENESSSOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMSPARTICIPATORY PROCESSCONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENTINSTITUTIONAL CAPACITYOPENNESSWORKSHOPSCIVIL SOCIETY ENGAGEMENTCITIZEN ENGAGEMENTSOCIAL POLICIESHUMAN RIGHTSPARTICIPATORY POLICYPROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONCONSENSUSCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYPARTICIPATORY MONITORINGSOCIAL AUDITWORKING CONDITIONSSOCIAL AUDITSPARTNERSFACILITATORSPARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENTSTAKEHOLDERBUDGET MONITORINGBOOTCBOPUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITYCOMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOUTREACHSTAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENTPUBLIC MEETINGSCOMMUNITY RADIOAUDITINGSOCIAL INVESTMENTSERVICE PROVIDERSWorking PaperWorld Bank10.1596/24771