Zaltsman, Ariel2021-12-092021-12-092006-05https://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders and systems. A number of strong features of Chile’s main M&E system are also noted.Este documento presenta un análisis comparativo entre las experiencias de cinco países con la institucionalización de sistemas nacionales de monitoreo y evaluación (MyE). Entre las lecciones obtenidas se pueden mencionar las grandes ventajas de contar con el decidido apoyo de las autoridades más altas, y los beneficios de la coordinación entre los sistemas y sus distintas partes interesadas. También se destaca una serie de aspectos distintivos del principal sistema de MyE de Chile.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOMONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMBUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESSNATIONAL BUDGET LAWPUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCEMANAGEMENT CONTROLNATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITYPUBLIC SECTOR REFORMMINISTERIAL RESOLUTIONPRIMARY CONCERNORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTUREENHANCING TRANSPARENCYEXTERNAL MONITORINGCOST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISPOLITICAL AUTHORITYINFORMATION FLOWMASS MEDIAMACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUMKNOWLEDGE PROGRAMCONTINUOUS ASSESSMENTEXTERNAL FACTORPROGRAM CLASSIFICATIONORGANIZATIONAL PROCESSINSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVESELECTION CRITERIONPUBLIC RESOURCEEvaluationWorld Bank10.1596/36699