Kelly, Lauren2014-07-292014-07-292005-10-25https://hdl.handle.net/10986/19053At the request of the World Bank's Executive Board, the Bank's Operations Evaluation Department (OED) has been conducting an evaluation of the Bank's involvement in global programs. The Phase 1 Report titled The World Bank's Approach to Global Programs focused on the strategic and programmatic management of the Bank's global portfolio of 70 programs in five Bank Networks (a cluster of closely related sectors) and was presented to the Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE) on June 12, 2002. This case study is one of 26 and derives additional lessons for the Bank's strategic and programmatic management of global programs as well as lessons for the design and management of individual programs. This case study assesses the value added by the Bank's participation in the Global IPM Facility with a view to learning lessons for the Bank s future involvement in global programs. This is not a programmatic evaluation of the Global IPM Facility, nor a substitute for a thorough external independent evaluation. Several studies using new survey data detailing the substantial health and ecological benefits of IPM have emerged that contend that IPM does not result in a loss in production. Yet the debate continues about the most cost-effective and fiscally sustainable approach to extending knowledge about IPM practices to farmers.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOACCOUNTABILITYACCOUNTINGAGENDA 21AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIESAGRICULTURAL CROPSAGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENTAGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATIONAGRICULTURAL OPERATIONSAGRICULTURAL OUTPUTAGRICULTURAL PESTSAGRICULTURAL PRODUCERSAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITYAGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITIESAGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE ORGANIZATIONAGROCHEMICALSANIMAL DISEASESANIMAL HEALTHBANANASBIOLOGICAL CONTROLCAPACITY BUILDINGCARBONCASH CROPSCASSAVACGIARCGIAR CENTERSCGIAR SYSTEMCHEMICAL CONTROLCHEMICAL INDUSTRYCHEMICAL INPUTSCOCOACOFFEECONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKCONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHCONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITYCONVENTIONAL PRODUCTIONCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSESCOTTONCROPCROP LOSSCROP PRODUCTIONCROP PROTECTIONCROP YIELDSDECISION MAKINGDEVELOPED COUNTRIESDEVELOPMENT BANKSDEVELOPMENT GRANT FACILITYDEVELOPMENT RESEARCHDISEASESDISTRICT GOVERNMENTSDOMESTIC ANIMALSDRINKING WATERECONOMIC GROWTHECONOMICSECOSYSTEMSEMPIRICAL EVIDENCEENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITSENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSENVIRONMENTAL ISSUESENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONENVIRONMENTAL RISKSEVALUATION CRITERIAEXPENDITURESEXTENSION AGENTSEXTERNALITIESFAOFARMFARMERFARMER FIELD SCHOOLSFARMERSFARMINGFARMING SYSTEMSFOOD DEMANDFOOD PRODUCTSFOOD SAFETYFOOD SAFETY REGULATIONSFOOD SECURITYFORESTRYFURHARVESTHEALTH RISKSHOST PLANTHOUSINGIFADIMPACT ASSESSMENTINSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTINTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENTINTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTERSIPMIPM PROGRAMSIPM TRAINERSLIVESTOCKLIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENTMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDINGNATIONAL RESEARCHNATURAL RESOURCE BASENATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENTNEGATIVE EXTERNALITIESPEST CONTROLPEST POPULATIONSPESTICIDEPESTICIDE ACTION NETWORKPESTICIDE APPLICATIONSPESTICIDE MANAGEMENTPESTICIDE POISONING CASESPESTICIDE RESIDUEPESTICIDE RESIDUESPESTICIDE RESISTANCEPESTICIDE USEPESTICIDESPESTSPLANT PROTECTIONPLANTAINPLANTAINSPOLICY DECISIONSPOLICY INSTRUMENTSPOLICY MAKERSPOLICY REFORMPOVERTY ALLEVIATIONPRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLEPRODUCEPRODUCTION COSTSPRODUCTION FUNCTIONSPRODUCTION OF RICEPRODUCTION SYSTEMSPROFITABILITYPUBLIC GOODPUBLIC GOODSREGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BANKSRESIDUE LEVELSRICERICE CROPRICE CROPSRICE PRODUCTIONRIO EARTH SUMMITRISK MANAGEMENTRURAL COMMUNITIESRURAL DEVELOPMENTSAFE HANDLINGSAVINGSSCIENTIFIC ADVICESCIENTIFIC RESEARCHSOIL FERTILITYSPRINGSUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURESUSTAINABLE FORESTRYSUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODSSWISS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSYNTHETIC CHEMICALSYNTHETIC CHEMICAL PESTICIDESTECHNICAL ASSISTANCETOMATOESUNCEDUNDPUNEPUNITED NATIONSVEGETABLE PRODUCTIONVEGETABLESWEEDS10.1596/19053