Orac, JanaBarma, Naazneen H.2014-02-032014-02-032014-01https://hdl.handle.net/10986/16834The adequacy of compensation for government workers and the affordability of the public sector wage bill are important concerns for many developing countries. Suitable pay is considered a necessary -- albeit far from sufficient -- condition for attracting and retaining skilled public sector staff. This paper makes the case for conducting fine-grained analysis of pay and compensation issues in order to enable an accurate assessment of the challenges faced and thereby to generate good-fit reform recommendations that are both principled and feasible. The first part of the paper focuses on prevalent challenges in pay reform, both contextual and analytical. It builds on the experiences from three very different settings: Armenia, the Lao People s Democratic Republic, and Mongolia. The study begins by surveying some of the common difficulties in conducting granular analysis on civil service compensation. It then outlines a series of methodological approaches that can prove useful in developing comprehensive, targeted, and nuanced pay analyses and discusses how it is possible to overcome potential limitations in practice. The second half of the paper presents a case study of pay and compensation analysis in Lao PDR. The study illuminates how a number of these approaches can be combined in assessing a specific set of pay challenges and generating robust recommendations tailored to context. A brief postscript, with the benefit of hindsight on what subsequently happened on the ground in Lao PDR, reflects on the limitations of technical analysis in motivating reform implementation in practice.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOACCOUNTINGACCOUNTING PRACTICESAGE GROUPSANALYTICAL APPROACHAVERAGE WAGESBLOCK GRANTSBRIBESBUDGETARY REVENUESCENTRAL AUTHORITIESCENTRAL BODYCIVIL SERVANTCIVIL SERVANT STATUSCIVIL SERVANTSCIVIL SERVICECIVIL SERVICE AGENCYCIVIL SERVICE PAYCIVIL SERVICE REFORMCIVIL SERVICE SALARIESCOLLAPSECOMMERCIAL BANKSCOMMODITY PRICESCOMPENSATION PACKAGECOMPENSATION PACKAGESCORRUPTIONCOUNTRY COMPARISONSDATA COLLECTIONDEMOCRACYDIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENTDOMESTIC FIRMSEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTEDUCATIONAL LEVELSEDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONSEMPLOYEEEMPLOYMENT SECURITYEVIDENCE DOESEXPENDITURE CONTROLSFINANCIAL CRISISFISCAL CONSTRAINTFISCAL CONSTRAINTSFISCAL COSTSFISCAL ENVELOPEFISCAL PERSPECTIVEFISCAL POLICYFISCAL SUSTAINABILITYGOVERNMENT BUDGETGOVERNMENT CADRESGOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENTGOVERNMENT EXPENDITURESGOVERNMENT PERFORMANCEHEALTH CAREHEALTH INSURANCEHEALTH SECTORHEALTH WORKERSHOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTIONHOUSEHOLD SURVEYHOUSEHOLD SURVEYSHOUSINGHUMAN RESOURCEHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTJOB SECURITYJOB TENUREJOBSLABOR MARKETLABOR MARKETSLAWSLEGISLATIONLIABILITYMINISTERMINISTRIES OF FINANCEMINISTRY OF FINANCEMONETARY INCENTIVESMULTINATIONALNATIONAL SECURITYNATURAL RESOURCESNEPOTISMNUMBER OF EMPLOYEESOFFICE WORKERSORGANIZATIONAL CULTUREPENSIONSPERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTPERFORMANCE ORIENTATIONPERMANENT JOBPOLICEPOLICY DECISIONSPOVERTY REDUCTIONPRIMARY EDUCATIONPRIVATE ENTERPRISESPRIVATE FIRMSPRIVATE SECTORPRIVATE SECTOR FIRMSPRIVATE SECTOR JOBSPRIVATE SECTOR WORKERSPRODUCTIVITYPROVINCIAL LEVELPUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONPUBLIC EMPLOYEESPUBLIC EMPLOYMENTPUBLIC EXPENDITUREPUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEWPUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKINGPUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTPUBLIC SECTORPUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYEESPUBLIC SECTOR JOBPUBLIC SECTOR LABORPUBLIC SECTOR REFORMPUBLIC SECTOR SPECIALISTPUBLIC SECTOR WORKERSPUBLIC SERVICEQUANTITATIVE DATAQUANTITATIVE INDICATORSRECURRENT EXPENDITURERECURRENT EXPENDITURESREFORM AGENDAREMEDIESSAVINGSSECONDARY SCHOOLINGSECTOR MANAGERSSERVICE DELIVERYSERVICE EMPLOYMENTSOCIAL SECURITYSTATE-OWNED ENTERPRISESSTATISTICAL ANALYSISSUBSIDIARIESSUBSIDIARYTECHNICAL ASSISTANCETOTAL EMPLOYMENTTOTAL EXPENDITURETOTAL SPENDINGTOTAL WAGETRIANGULATIONTYPES OF ENTITIESUNCERTAINTYUNPAID FAMILY WORKERSWAGE BILLWAGE EXPENDITURESWORKERWORKING CONDITIONSYOUNGER WORKERSWorld Bank10.1596/1813-9450-6744