Hawkins, LoraineLindelow, MagnusOsornprasop, Sutayut2013-05-282013-05-282012-08https://hdl.handle.net/10986/13574This paper focuses on efficiency and equity in the financing of health services, and the evolving role of central and local government in the health sector. Thailand has seen significant improvements in health outcomes and succeeded in expanding the coverage of health protection schemes over the last decades. While the achievements of Thailand's health system are undeniable, this paper highlights three key challenges: (i) inequalities in utilization and spending under different health financing schemes and across geographic areas; (ii) mounting cost pressures; and (iii) fragmentation of financing and unresolved issues concerning the respective roles of central and local governments. This paper shows that although some of the differences in utilization and spending across schemes can be explained by the age profile of members, significant variations remain even after controlling for differences. It documents large variation in resources and spending across regions, both for the system as a whole and within the respective health financing schemes. In addition, the paper highlights pressures to increase government health spending that are primarily the result of rising spending in the Universal Coverage (UC) and Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS) schemes. Cost pressures are likely to persist due to rising incidence of chronic disease, population aging, continuing pressure from health workers for greater compensation, demands for expanded benefits under the respective schemes, and the rising expectations of patients. Finally, the paper argues for a more systematic and decisive approach to decentralization of prevention and promotion functions, based on more detailed specification of the roles and responsibilities of central and local government. It also suggests that the current approach to primary care decentralization through voluntary transfer of health centers has limited potential, and that there is a need to consider local management of networks of providers that combine both general hospital and primary care services.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOACCESS TO HEALTH CAREACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICESAGE GROUPSAGE STRUCTUREAGEDAGINGAMBULATORY CAREANTENATAL CAREBRAINBRAIN DRAINBREAST CANCERBUDGET ALLOCATIONBULLETINCAPITA HEALTH EXPENDITURECAPITATIONCAPITATION PAYMENTCARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORSCARE PERFORMANCECENTRAL BUDGETCERVICAL CANCERCHRONIC CONDITIONSCHRONIC DISEASECHRONIC DISEASESCITIZENCITIZENSCLINICAL OUTCOMESCLINICAL PRACTICECOMMUNICABLE DISEASESCOMMUNITY HOSPITALSCOST OF CARECURRENT POPULATIONDECISION MAKINGDEMOCRACYDEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITIONDEPENDENCY RATIODETERMINANTS OF HEALTHDIABETESDIAGNOSISDISEASE MANAGEMENTDISEASE PREVENTIONDISPARITIES IN HEALTHDISSEMINATIONDOCTORSDRUGSECONOMIC GROWTHECONOMIC OUTCOMESECONOMIES OF SCALEELDERLYELDERLY POPULATIONEMERGENCY CAREEMPLOYMENTEPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHANGESEPIDEMIOLOGICAL TRANSITIONEPILEPSYEQUITY IN ACCESSESSENTIAL HEALTH SERVICESEXPENDITURE CONTROLEXPENDITURESFAMILY PLANNINGFAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMSFEE-FOR-SERVICEFERTILITY RATEFINANCIAL BARRIERSFINANCIAL INCENTIVEFINANCIAL INCENTIVESFINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFINANCIAL PROTECTIONGENERAL PRACTITIONERSGLUCOSEGOVERNMENT AGENCIESHEALTH CAREHEALTH CARE COSTSHEALTH CARE SYSTEMHEALTH CARE WORKERSHEALTH CENTERSHEALTH ECONOMICSHEALTH EXPENDITUREHEALTH EXPENDITURESHEALTH FINANCINGHEALTH FINANCING REFORMHEALTH INSURANCEHEALTH INSURANCE SCHEMESHEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEMHEALTH INSURERSHEALTH ORGANIZATIONHEALTH OUTCOMESHEALTH POLICYHEALTH PROFESSIONALSHEALTH PROMOTIONHEALTH RESEARCHHEALTH SECTORHEALTH SERVICEHEALTH SERVICE UTILIZATIONHEALTH SERVICESHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCHHEALTH SPENDINGHEALTH SYSTEMHEALTH SYSTEM PERFORMANCEHEALTH SYSTEMSHEALTH WORKERSHEALTH WORKFORCEHEALTHCARE INSTITUTIONSHEALTHCARE SYSTEMHEART ATTACKSHOSPITAL ADMISSIONHOSPITAL ADMISSIONSHOSPITAL BEDSHOSPITAL SYSTEMSHOSPITALIZATIONHOSPITALSHUMAN DEVELOPMENTHUMAN RESOURCESHYPERTENSIONILLNESSIMMUNIZATIONIMMUNIZATIONSIMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTHINCOMEINCOME COUNTRIESINFANTINFANT MORTALITYINFANT MORTALITY RATESINFERTILITYINFORMAL SECTORINJURIESINTERNATIONAL COMPARISONSINTERNATIONAL TRADELABOR FORCELABOR MARKETLEVELS OF FERTILITYLIFE EXPECTANCYLIFE EXPECTANCY AT BIRTHLIVE BIRTHSLOCAL AUTHORITIESLOCAL GOVERNMENTSLOW INCOMEMATERNAL MORTALITYMATERNAL MORTALITY RATIOMEDICAL BENEFITMEDICAL DOCTORSMEDICAL EDUCATIONMEDICAL STAFFMINISTRY OF EDUCATIONMORBIDITYMORTALITYMYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONNATIONAL HEALTHNATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMSNATIONAL LEVELNUMBER OF CHILDRENNUMBER OF CHILDREN PER WOMANNURSENURSESNUTRITIONOUTPATIENT SERVICESPARTICIPATION IN DECISIONPATIENTPATIENT PARTICIPATIONPATIENTSPAYMENTS FOR HEALTH CAREPHARMACISTSPHOPOCKET PAYMENTSPOLICY RESPONSEPOPULATION DISTRIBUTIONPOPULATION PROJECTIONSPREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICESPRIMARY CAREPRIMARY HEALTH CAREPRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCEPRIVATE HOSPITAL SECTORPRIVATE HOSPITALSPRIVATE INSURANCEPRIVATE SECTORPRIVATE SPENDINGPROGNOSISPROGRESSPROVIDER PAYMENTPROVINCIAL HOSPITALSPUBLIC DEMANDPUBLIC EXPENDITUREPUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH EXPENDITUREPUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMPUBLIC HOSPITALPUBLIC HOSPITAL SYSTEMSPUBLIC HOSPITALSPUBLIC PROVIDERSPUBLIC SECTORQUALITY OF HEALTHQUALITY SERVICESRESEARCH INSTITUTIONSRESOURCE ALLOCATIONRISK FACTORSRURAL AREASRURAL POPULATIONSEGMENTS OF SOCIETYSERVICE DELIVERYSHARE OF HEALTH SPENDINGSOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCESOCIAL SECURITYSURGERYSURVIVAL RATETREATMENTUNFPAURBAN AREASURBANIZATIONVACCINESWORKERSWORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATIONWORLD POPULATIONdecentralizationWorld Bank10.1596/13574