Schipper, YoudiHoogeveen, Johannes G.2012-06-252012-06-252005-05https://hdl.handle.net/10986/8937Existing empirical studies on the relation between inequality and growth have been criticized for their focus on income inequality and their use of cross-country data sets. Schipper and Hoogeveen use two sets of small area welfare estimates-often referred to as poverty maps-to estimate a model of rural per capita expenditure growth for Uganda between 1992 and 1999. They estimate the growth effects of expenditure and education inequality while controlling for other factors, such as initial levels of expenditure and human capital, family characteristics, and unobserved spatial heterogeneity. The authors correct standard errors to reflect the uncertainty due to the fact that they use estimates rather than observations. They find that per capita expenditure growth in rural Uganda is affected positively by the level of education as well as by the degree of education inequality. Expenditure inequality does not have a significant impact on growth.CC BY 3.0 IGOABSOLUTE POVERTYABSOLUTE VALUEANNUAL GROWTHASSET INEQUALITYAVERAGE LEVELCITIZENSCONDITIONAL CONVERGENCECOUNTRY CASECOUNTRY SPECIFICCOUNTRY SPECIFICITYCOVARIANCE MATRIXCROSS -COUNTRY INEQUALITYCROSS-COUNTRY DATACROSS-COUNTRY STUDIESDATA ISSUESDATA SETDATA SETSDEPENDENT VARIABLEDESCRIPTIVE STATISTICSDEVELOPING COUNTRIESDEVELOPMENT ECONOMICSDEVELOPMENT POLICYECONOMETRIC ISSUESECONOMETRIC PROBLEMSECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTECONOMIC GROWTHECONOMIC INEQUALITYECONOMIC LITERATUREECONOMIC REVIEWECONOMICS LETTERSEDUCATION LEVELEDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENTEMPIRICAL EVIDENCEEMPIRICAL GROWTH LITERATUREEMPIRICAL RESEARCHEMPIRICAL SECTIONEMPIRICAL STUDIESENDOGENOUS VARIABLEENDOGENOUS VARIABLESERROR TERMERROR TERMSESTIMATION TECHNIQUESFIXED EFFECTSFIXED EFFECTS ESTIMATORGINI COEFFICIENTGROWTH EFFECTGROWTH EMPIRICSGROWTH IMPACTGROWTH LITERATUREGROWTH MODELGROWTH MODELSGROWTH RATEGROWTH REGRESSIONGROWTH REGRESSIONSGROWTH THEORIESHIGH-INEQUALITY DEVELOPING COUNTRIESHOUSEHOLD DATAHOUSEHOLD INCOMEHOUSEHOLD MEMBERSHOUSEHOLD SIZEHUMAN CAPITALINCOMEINCOME GROWTHINCOME INEQUALITYINEQUALITYINEQUALITY CHANGEINEQUALITY COEFFICIENTINEQUALITY DATAINEQUALITY EFFECTINEQUALITY ESTIMATESINEQUALITY INDICATORSINEQUALITY MEASUREINEQUALITY MEASURESINEQUALITY REGRESSIONSINEQUALITY SERIESINEQUALITY VARIABLESINVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIESLAGGED VALUESLAND INEQUALITYLONG RUNMACROECONOMIC IMPLICATIONSMEAN EXPENDITUREMEASUREMENT ERRORMEASURING INCOME INEQUALITYMICRO DATANEGATIVE CORRELATIONNEGATIVE EFFECTNEGATIVE SIGNNEW GROWTH THEORIESOLD ISSUESOUTPUT GROWTHPAPERSPER CAPITA EXPENDITUREPER CAPITA GROWTHPOLICY MAKERSPOLICY RESEARCHPOLICY REVIEWPOSITIVE EFFECTPOVERTY CHANGEPOVERTY ESTIMATESPOVERTY INCIDENCEPOVERTY REDUCTIONPOVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIESPOVERTY-GROWTH-INEQUALITY TRIANGLEPRIMARY EDUCATIONPRODUCTION FUNCTIONREGIONAL DUMMIESREGRESSION ANALYSISREGRESSION RESULTSSIGNIFICANCE LEVELSIGNIFICANT EFFECTSIGNIFICANT IMPACTSIGNIFICANT NEGATIVETRADE POLICYUNEQUAL DISTRIBUTIONWhich Inequality Matters? Growth Evidence Based on Small Area Welfare Estimates in UgandaWorld Bank10.1596/1813-9450-3592