Rose-Ackerman, Susan2012-08-132012-08-131996-04https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11627The author proposes three types of anticorruption strategies: those that reduce the benefits that officials control, those that increase the costs of bribery, and those that limit the bargaining power of officials. In essence, fighting corruption involves introducing more competition, privatizing government activities, and introducing greater transparency.CC BY 3.0 IGOCORRUPTIONBRIBERYCIVIL SERVICE REFORMSSTATE RESPONSIBILITYADMINISTRATIVE REFORMSPUBLIC SECTORSTATE IMMUNITIESDENATIONALIZATIONMARKET COMPETITION ACTIONSADMINISTRATIVE REFORMSANTIBRIBERY LAWSANTICORRUPTIONANTICORRUPTION COMMISSIONANTICORRUPTION STRATEGIESAUTHORITYBRIBE PAYERSBRIBERYBRIBESCITIZENSCIVIL SERVANTSCOLLUSIONCORRUPT INCENTIVESCORRUPT OFFICIALSCORRUPTIONFIGHTING CORRUPTIONFINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFOREIGN TRADEFREE PRESSFREEDOM OF INFORMATIONGOOD GOVERNANCEGOVERNMENT AGENCYGOVERNMENT POLICYGOVERNMENT SERVICESHUMAN RIGHTSJUDICIARYLAW ENFORCEMENTLAW REFORMLEGAL SUPPORTLEGALITYLEGITIMACYLIBELMALFEASANCEPAYOFFSPENALTIESPOLICE FORCESPOLITICAL ECONOMYPOLITICAL LEGITIMACYPOLITICIANSPRESIDENCYPRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENTPRIVATIZATIONPROCUREMENTPUBLIC CONTRACTSPUBLIC MONEYPUBLIC OFFICIALSPUBLIC POLICYPUBLIC SECTORPUNISHMENTREGULATORY INSTITUTIONSSANCTIONSSUBSTANTIVE LAWTRANSPARENCYUSAIDWorld Bank10.1596/11627