World Bank2014-04-162014-04-162013-01https://hdl.handle.net/10986/17870Indonesia's Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) is the largest Community Driven Development (CDD) program in the world covering all urban wards (PNPM-Urban) and rural villages (PNPM-Rural) in Indonesia. This policy note summarizes a comprehensive process evaluation of the PNPM-Urban program which has been carried by the Research and Development (RAND) corporation in collaboration with survey meter, as well as a rapid appraisal of two pilot subcomponents of the PNPM-Urban program: the Neighborhood Development Scheme (ND), and Poverty Alleviation Partnership Grant Mechanism (PAPG) carried out by a small team of consultants. The RAND evaluation was designed to look at how specific aspects of the program are working, document good practice, distill lessons learned, and identify options for program reform based mainly on a qualitative field study in a sample of kelurahans. This paper is organized as follows: section one gives introduction and approach. The main findings of the evaluation and rapid appraisal are summarized in section two, followed by a discussion and recommendations for program design in section three. The full studies including detailed findings and data are available as companions to this policy note.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOACCESS TO INFRASTRUCTUREACCOUNTABILITYAUDITINGAUDITSBASIC INFRASTRUCTUREBASIC NEEDSBASIC SERVICESBENEFICIARIESCAPACITY BUILDINGCITIESCLEAN WATERCOLLECTIVE ACTIONCOMMUNITIESCOMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONSCOMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONSCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENTCOMMUNITY GRANTSCOMMUNITY INITIATIVESCOMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTCOMMUNITY LEADERSCOMMUNITY MAPPINGCOMMUNITY MEETINGSCOMMUNITY MEMBERSCOMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONSCOMMUNITY OUTREACHCOMMUNITY OWNERSHIPCOMMUNITY PARTICIPATIONCOMMUNITY SELF HELPCOMMUNITY SELF HELP GROUPSCONSULTATIVE PROCESSCORRUPTIONCRIMECRISESDATA COLLECTIONDECISION MAKINGDEMOCRACYDESCRIPTIONDEVELOPMENT PLANNINGECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTECONOMIC GROWTHEMPLOYMENTENGINEERSFACILITATORSFEMALEFEMALESFIELD SURVEYSFIELD VISITSFINANCIAL MANAGEMENTGENDERGOOD GOVERNANCEGOVERNANCE ISSUESHOUSEHOLD SURVEYSHOUSEHOLDSHOUSESHOUSINGHOUSING IMPROVEMENTSIMPACT EVALUATIONINCOMEINFORMAL SETTLEMENTSINFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTSINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTSINSTITUTIONAL CAPACITYKEY INFORMANT INTERVIEWSLAND USELEARNINGLESSONS LEARNEDLIVING CONDITIONLIVING CONDITIONSLOCAL CAPACITYLOCAL CAPACITY BUILDINGLOCAL COMMUNITYLOCAL GOVERNANCELOCAL GOVERNMENTSLOCAL INSTITUTIONSMARGINAL AREASNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTNATIONAL LEVELNEIGHBORHOODOUTREACHPARTICIPATION IN PLANNINGPARTICIPATION RATESPARTICIPATORY APPROACHPARTICIPATORY PLANNINGPARTICIPATORY PROCESSPERFORMANCE INDICATORSPILOT ACTIVITIESPOOR HEALTHPOOR URBAN COMMUNITIESPOVERTY ALLEVIATIONPOVERTY RATESPOVERTY REDUCTIONPOVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMSPRIME MINISTERPROCUREMENTPROCUREMENT PROCEDURESPROJECT IMPLEMENTATIONPROJECT MANAGEMENTPROJECT MANAGEMENT UNITPROJECT MONITORINGPURCHASING POWERPURCHASING POWER PARITYQUALITATIVE METHODSQUALITATIVE TOOLSREGIONAL POVERTYRESETTLEMENTRURAL AREASSAFETYSANITATIONSCHOOL FEESSELF HELPSERVICE DELIVERYSETTLEMENTSETTLEMENT PLANNINGSLUMSLUM AREASSLUM UPGRADINGSLUMSSOCIAL ACTIVITIESSOCIAL CAPITALSOCIAL DEVELOPMENTSOCIAL GROUPSSOCIAL INTERMEDIATIONSOCIAL NETWORKSSOCIAL PROGRAMSSOCIAL SERVICESSPATIAL PLANNINGSTREET CHILDRENSUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTSSUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTSTARGETINGURBAN AREASURBAN COMMUNITIESURBAN DEVELOPMENTURBAN ENVIRONMENTSURBAN GOVERNANCEURBAN INFRASTRUCTUREURBAN PLANNINGURBAN POLICYURBAN POORURBAN POVERTYURBAN PROJECTSURBAN ROADSURBAN STUDIESURBAN UPGRADINGURBANIZATIONUTILITIESVILLAGESWASTEWASTE COLLECTIONYOUTH10.1596/17870