Ravallion, MartinWagstaff, Adam2012-03-192012-03-192010-07-01https://hdl.handle.net/10986/3858Bibliometric measures based on citations are widely used in assessing the scientific publication records of authors, institutions and journals. Yet currently favored measures lack a clear conceptual foundation and are known to have counter-intuitive properties. The authors propose a new approach that is grounded on a theoretical "influence function," representing explicit prior beliefs about how citations reflect influence. They provide conditions for robust qualitative comparisons of influence -- conditions that can be implemented using readily-available data. An example is provided using the economics publication records of selected universities and the World Bank.CC BY 3.0 IGOARTICLEARTICLESBELIEFSBIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASESCITATIONCITATION INDEXCITATIONSCOLLABORATIONDISCUSSIONECONOMETRICSECONOMIC THEORYECONOMICS LITERATUREENTRYIDEAIDEASINDICESINFORMATION SCIENCEOBJECTSORDERINGORDERINGSPAPERSPUBLISHINGRESEARCH OUTPUTRESEARCHERRESEARCHERSSCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINESSCIENTIFIC FIELDSSCIENTIFIC RESEARCHSCIENTISTSCIENTISTSSOCIAL SCIENCESOCIAL SCIENCESSTANDARDIZATIONUNIVERSITIESUNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTSUTILITY FUNCTIONVALUATIONWEBWorld Bank10.1596/1813-9450-5375