Deininger, KlausAli, Daniel AyalewFang, Ming2023-06-222023-06-222023-06-23https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/39911Data from 2,251 small and medium-size farms for 2021 and 2022 show that area reductions in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine remained limited. However, worsening terms of trade reduced farm profitability, implying that 46 percent of farms had a negative cash flow and 54 percent (67 percent in the 50-120 hectare group) were credit constrained in 2022, implying that longer term effects may be more adverse. Total factor productivity varies significantly across size groups but is not significantly different between formal and informal farms in the same size group. This suggests that limited transferability of land use rights that are disproportionately used by smaller farms may be one reason for low productivity. Improving transferability of land, digital access to markets, and mortgage lending could thus trigger investment and growth in higher value products by small and medium-size farms to solidify Ukraine’s comparative advantage in agriculture and improve rural living conditions in the context of reconstruction.enCC BY 3.0 IGOCC BY 3.0 IGORURAL IMPACT OF WARCREDIT MARKETSARMED CONFLICT IMPACT ON AGRICULTUREFOOD SECURITYAGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONPOST-CONFLICT AGRICULTURAL RECONSTRUCTIONFARM PROFITABILITYRURAL WELFAREWorking PaperWorld Bank10.1596/1813-9450-10464