World Bank2015-12-082015-12-082015-07https://hdl.handle.net/10986/23244The aim of this report is to illustrate the steps court users take in order to protect their interests through procedures carried out by courts. The focus is on the difference between the procedure in the law and actual practice. In outlining these differences, the report shall identify procedural inefficiencies, bottlenecks and potential areas for improvement of the procedure. It shall also estimate the approximate costs of these procedures to the parties.en-USCC BY 3.0 IGOTARIFFSPROMISSORY NOTEDEEDSHOLDINGCOURTCHECKSACCOUNTINGHOUSERECEIVABLESCIVIL PROCEDUREPLEADINGSPROMISSORY NOTESDEBTORSINTERESTCRIMINALSALARYOPTIONNOTARYDEBTORCOURT HEARINGSADMINISTRATIVE COURTWARRANTSWILLPAYMENTSNEGOTIATIONINFORMATION SYSTEMSLEGAL PROCEDURECREDITORSCREDITORDISCOVERYCOURT DECISIONSLEGAL THEORYCOURTSDEPENDENTCREDITSLABOR CLAIMJUDICIAL POSITIONSJUDGEDEBTSSMALL DEBTSMAGISTRATESCOURT HEARINGCOURT PRACTICEADOPTIONCASESPAYMENTDEBTJUDGESCOURT FEESRETURNSETTLEMENTSOCIAL SECURITYCLASSES OF CREDITORSCOMPENSATIONCOURT ORDERRESIDENCEGOOD FAITHACCESS TO INFORMATIONJUDICIAL SYSTEMATTORNEYSMARKET ECONOMYGOODJURISDICTIONFUNGIBLEWITNESSESFUTUREVALUELITIGATIONRETURNSCREDITATTORNEYS’ FEESJUDICIAL COUNCILCOURTHOUSESBANK CREDITSCLAIMSCOURT ADMINISTRATIONPRIVATE ENFORCEMENTLABOR CLAIMSRECEIVABLEPROPERTYISSUANCELEGAL REQUIREMENTJUDICIAL CONTROLMARKETCOURT STAFFMONETARY CLAIMCLAIMANTSCOURT CLAIMCOURT DECISIONENFORCEMENTTERRITORIAL JURISDICTIONJUSTICEHUMAN RIGHTSINTERESTSTIME OF COLLECTIONCOURT PRACTICESGOODSWRIT OF EXECUTIONSECURITYDISMISSALLEGAL SYSTEMSHARECOLLATERALTARIFFPROCEDURAL INEFFICIENCIESEXPERT WITNESSESLAWRESTORATIONFORUM SHOPPINGCHECKINTELLECTUAL PROPERTYJUDICIAL REVIEWCOURT STATISTICSCOURT ORDERSENFORCEMENT PROCEDUREGUARANTEECONSUMER PROTECTIONBENEFITSCLAIMCOURT SYSTEMCLAIMANTReportWorld Bank10.1596/23244