Viewpoint The World Bank Group May 1997 Note No. 114 Designing Regulatory Institutions for Infrastructure-Lessons from Argentina Antonio Estacbe As in many aspects of infrastructure reform, Argentina has been a leader in experimenting with the design of regulatory agencies. This Note describes the essential elements of good regulatory agency design-independence, autonomy, expertise, and accountability-and rates Argentina's performance against these benchmarks in the gas, power, water, and telecommunications sec- tors. The Note concludes that the biggest challenges to design are achieving political indepen- dence and establishing rules to ensure regulatory accountability. What the doctor would have ordered' Independence. Ideally, regulators should oper- ate independently from political pressures-from Most regulatory experts would argue that there ministries and from the regulated enterprises, are some common elements that designers of private or public. Here, most experts would ar- regulatory agencies need to address. First, gov- gue that as a minimum for ensuring this inde- ernments must decide on breadth of regulatory pendence, regulators should be appointed on authority. In principle, regulatory authorities can the basis of professional rather than political be industry-specific with separate agencies for criteria and should have formal protection from gas, water, electricity, and so on, as in the United arbitrary removal during their term. In addition, Kingdom. They can be sector-specific with sepa- the appointment process should involve both rate agencies for groups of related industries, the executive and the legislature, to ensure such as for gas and electricity combined, as in proper checks and balances. Colombia and Hungary. Or they can be multi- sectoral with a single regulatory agency for all Autonomy. To be autonomous, regulatory agen- or most infrastructure sectors, as in the case of cies must first have their own resources-from state-level regulators in the United States and their own funding sources. Relying on budget- national regulators in Jamaica. Most experts ary transfers controlled by politicians is often agree that a multisectoral agency offers advan- viewed as a threat to regulators' independence. tages over the alternatives. It pools regulatory Cutting their allocation would be an easy way resources (regulatory economists and lawyers, to reduce their effectiveness. The most common for example), especially important in countries method of funding is through levies on the regu- with limited regulatory capacity. And by pitting lated firms or the consumers of the regulated interest groups against one another, it tends to services. These levies can be viewed as user increase resistance to regulatory capture and fees for the protection services provided by the political interference and to improve the con- regulators. But autonomy must go beyond fi- sistency of decisions across sectors. nancing. Regulators should also have autonomy in staffing, so that they can recruit staff with Next, the designers face a set of interrelated high levels of expertise. The tasks of the agency issues to do with independence, autonomy, and should determine the size of the staff-not po- accountability: litical considerations such as how many people Private Sector Development Department * Finance, Private Sector, and Infrastructure Network Designing Regulatory Institutions for Infrastructure-Lessons from Argentina ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Rules setting deadlines for decisions 'Rules requiring detailed justifications and nonpolitical reviews of decisions * Processes to ensure that all concerned parties reip ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~have the opportunity to express their views 7 1 Argentin public hearings and to appeal decisions ~whic~h4iste&tJi~ee. ~(eneroy * Rules to permit the removal of regulators in setec*;&tbe dw o n : lcases of proven misconduct. staff~ing the agency caeaonereeneAnother key factor in accountability is the num- theommercial oper. thaner of regulators. Generally, a regulatory com- mission made up of three to five members is a AchievingIOfl~K better choice than a single regulator, because cies often requires exempting them from civil Geach member of the commission ends up moni- sv salary t and recruitm ent rules. Itmayalso toring the others, increainng accountability. The advantage of regulatory commissions is now widely recognized even in the United Kingdom, which originated the single-regulator approach. could bArgentina's experience at a ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~national level Accountability. AccunabliyrquIn Argentina responsibility for infrastructure ser- vices is divided between the national and the provincial goverments. The national government initiated a privatization program in 1989 for all for many bureaucrats. It alsorequiresclear, hutilities under its purview-mainly gas, electric- simple proceduralrules.Mostimportan e ity generation and transmission, and water and electricity distribution in the Buenos Aires met- ~ Isuau~t~eOr~