H N P D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R Reaching The Poor Program Paper No. 3 Cambodia: Using Contracting to Reduce Inequity in Primary Health Care Delivery J. Brad Schwartz and Indu Bhushan October 2004 CAMBODIA: USING CONTRACTING TO REDUCE INEQUITY IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE DELIVERY J. Brad Schwartz and Indu Bhushan October 2004 Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank's Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual author(s) whose name appears on the paper. Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Managing Editor. Submissions should have been previously reviewed and cleared by the sponsoring department, which will bear the cost of publication. No additional reviews will be undertaken after submission. The sponsoring department and author(s) bear full responsibility for the quality of the technical contents and presentation of material in the series. Since the material will be published as presented, authors should submit an electronic copy in a predefined format (available at www.worldbank.org/hnppublications on the Guide for Authors page). Drafts that do not meet minimum presentational standards may be returned to authors for more work before being accepted. The Managing Editor of the series is Joy de Beyer (jdebeyer@worldbank.org). The Editor in Chief for HNP publications is Alexander S. Preker (apreker@worldbank.org). For information regarding this and other World Bank publications, please contact the HNP Advisory Services at healthpop@worldbank.org (email), 202-473-2256 (telephone), or 202-522-3234 (fax). © 2004 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433 All rights reserved. ii Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Cambodia: Using Contracting to Reduce Inequity in Primary Health Care Delivery J. Brad Schwartza and Indu Bhushanb aDepartment of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA bPacific Department, Asian Development Bank, Cambodia Paper prepared for the Program on Reaching the Poor with Effective Health, Nutrition, and Population Services, organized by the World Bank in cooperation with the William and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Governments of the Netherlands and Sweden. Abstract: This study examines the equity impact of using private sector contracts for the delivery of primary health care as an alternative to traditional government provision in Cambodia. It does so by using pre- and post intervention data from a large scale contracting experiment to provide primary health care in rural districts of Cambodia between 1998 and 2001. Equity as well as coverage targets for primary health care services were explicitly included in contracts awarded in five of nine rural districts with a population totaling over 1.25 million people. The remaining four districts included in the test were given identical equity and coverage targets and used the traditional government provision of services. After two-and-a-half years of the trial, the results suggest that although coverage of primary health care services in all districts had substantial increases, people in the poorest one-half of households living in contracted districts were more likely to receive these services than similarly circumstanced poor people in government districts, other factors equal. Keywords: Cambodia, health service inequality, primary health care, contracting, non- governmental organization. Disclaimer: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the paper are entirely those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent. Correspondence Details: J. Brad Schwartz, Department of Economics, Campus Box 3305, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3305, USA. Telephone: (919) 843-6268. Fax: (919) 966-4986. Email: Brad_Schwartz@unc.edu iii iv Table of Contents Foreword......................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements...........................................................................................................ix Country Context to the Study ............................................................................................1 Research Questions............................................................................................................1 Contracting Test.............................................................................................................1 Research Questions ........................................................................................................4 Methodology......................................................................................................................4 Wealth Index ..................................................................................................................4 Concentration Indices.....................................................................................................5 Need-Standardized Use of Public Health Facilities.......................................................5 Multivariate Method.......................................................................................................6 Nature and Source of Data.................................................................................................6 Health Care Indicators....................................................................................................9 Findings about Distribution ...............................................................................................9 Baseline Distribution......................................................................................................9 Follow-Up Distribution................................................................................................14 Changes between the Baseline and Follow-Up Surveys..............................................14 Multivariate Results.........................................................................................................16 Limitations.......................................................................................................................20 Implications .....................................................................................................................20 References........................................................................................................................23 List of Tables Table 1 Test districts..........................................................................................................3 Table 2 Average annual recurrent expenditure per capita (in U.S. dollars) ......................3 Table 3. Sample sizes.........................................................................................................8 Table 4. Health service indicator definitions and coverage goals ...................................10 Table 6. Changes in health care service coverage, 1997-2001 (percentage points)........12 Table 7. Concentration indices, 1997 and 2001 surveys .................................................13 Table 8 Changes in concentration indices, 1997­2001 ...................................................15 Table 9 Probit results, marginal effects (dF/dx) on the probability of health services received in the pooled baseline and follow-up surveys...................................................17 List of Figures Figure 1 Changes in health care coverage rates, 1997­2001 (percentage points)...........12 Figure 2 Changes in concentration indices, 1997­2001..................................................15 v vi FOREWORD This discussion paper is one in a series presenting the initial results of work undertaken through the Reaching the Poor Program, organized by the World Bank in cooperation with the Gates Foundation and the Governments of Sweden and the Netherlands. The Program is an effort to begin finding ways to overcome social and economic disparities in the use of health, nutrition, and population (HNP) services. These disparities have become increasingly well documented in recent years. Thus far, however, there has been only limited effort to move beyond documentation to the action needed to alleviate the problem. The Program seeks to start rectifying this, by taking stock of recent efforts to reach the poor with HNP services. The objective is to determine what has and has not worked in order to guide the design of future efforts. The approach taken has been quantitative, drawing upon and adapting techniques developed over the past thirty years to measure which economic groups benefit most from developing country government expenditures. This discussion paper is one of eighteen case studies commissioned by the Program. The studies were selected by a professional peer review committee from among the approximately 150 applications received in response to an internationally-distributed request for proposals. An earlier version of the paper was presented in a February 2004 global conference organized by the Program; the present version will appear in a volume of Program papers scheduled for publication in 2005, Reaching the Poor with Effective Health, Nutrition, and Population Services: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Further information about the Reaching the Poor Program is available at the following sites: Program Overview: http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/health/rpp/overview.htm List of Papers Commissioned by the Program: http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/health/rpp/projectlist.htm Presentations at the Program Conference: http://www1.worldbank.org/prem/poverty/health/rpp/conference.htm vii viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are indebted to the World Bank's Thematic Group on Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) and Poverty and to the Asian Development Bank for funding this research, and to the Ministry of Health of the Royal Government of Cambodia for granting permission to conduct the study. We also thank David Gwatkin, Benjamin Loevinsohn, Adam Wagstaff, Abdo Yazbek and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. As always, all remaining errors are our own. The authors are also grateful to the World Bank for publishing this study as an HNP Discussion Paper. ix x Country Context to the Study In the mid-1990s, war and political upheaval had left Cambodia with limited health care infrastructure, especially in rural areas. There were sufficient paramedical and management staff, but training and quality of care were inconsistent, and morale was low (Bhushan, Keller, and Schwartz 2002). The primary health care system was unable to deliver an adequate level of services. For example, only 39 percent of children between 12 and 23 months of age were fully immunized (NIS 2000). Research Questions To address these issues, the Royal Government of Cambodia obtained a loan from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for the Ministry of Health (MOH) to develop and implement a coverage plan modeled on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to restructure and broaden the primary health care system. The plan included the construction or rehabilitation of health centers, each designed to serve about 10,000 people, and merged small administrative districts into operational districts with an average of about 150,000 people. The coverage plan also defined a minimum package of activities (MPA) for health centers consisting of basic preventive and curative services including immunization, birth spacing, antenatal care, provision of micronutrients, and simple curative care for diarrhea, acute respiratory tract infections, and tuberculosis. Contracting Test As part of the overall implementation plan, the ADB loan also was used by the MOH to conduct a large-scale test of contracting with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for the delivery of primary health care services. In 1997, prior to health facility construction and procurement of equipment, a pre-contract baseline household survey was taken in candidate rural districts. The MOH awarded NGO contracts in five districts and included four government districts in the trial for comparisons. The contracting test started at the beginning of 1998, and a follow-up household survey was taken two-a-half years later in the summer of 2001. The information from the baseline and follow-up surveys comprises a unique dataset for comparing the distributional equity of primary health care services obtained with contracted and government provision of services.1 To make the test districts as comparable as possible, the candidate districts were not allowed to be: districts included in the MOH Accelerated District Development program, which were to receive additional support; districts already receiving significant donor assistance; or districts that encompassed the provincial capital, which receive more government funding than other districts because of their provincial hospitals. 1A similar contracting experiment in Guatemala to improve service delivery to indigenous people did not collect pre-contract baseline data to enable pre- and post-contract comparisons (Loevinsohn 2000). 1 The districts were randomly assigned to one of three health care delivery models: · Contract-out, in which the contractors had complete line responsibility for service delivery, including hiring, firing and setting wages, procuring and distributing essential drugs and supplies, organizing and staffing health facilities. · Contract-in, where the contractors worked within the MOH system to strengthen the existing district administrative structure. The contractors could not hire or fire health workers, although they could request their transfer. Drugs and supplies were provided through the normal MOH channels. In addition, the contractor received a nominal budget supplement for staff incentives and operating expenses. · Government provision, in which the management of services remained with the government District Health Management Team (DHMT) and drugs and supplies were provided through normal MOH channels. Like the contract-in districts, the DHMT received the same nominal budget supplement for staff incentives and operating expenses. An international competitive bidding process was used to select contractors for the contract-out and contract-in districts. Precisely defined, and objectively verifiable health care service indicators were measured for all contracted and government districts, using the data collected from the baseline survey, along with well-defined goals for improvement in service coverage and coverage of the poor. Pre-contract performance goals were established for child immunization and vitamin A, antenatal care, delivery by a trained birth attendant, delivery in a health facility, and knowledge and use of birth spacing in each district. More important for this study, an equity goal to target services to the poorest half of the population was mandated for all districts. All candidate districts at the time of the pre-contract survey had less than 20 percent of planned health facilities functional, and health service coverage was poor. Prior to bidding all potential contractors and the managers of the government districts were provided with the pre-contract indicators for each district and the coverage and equity targets to be achieved at the end of the four-year test. Contract awards were based on the quality of the technical proposal and price. The nine operational districts included in the contracting test were made up of two contracted-out, three contracted-in, and four government districts. The test districts are spatially separated in three different provinces, and each has a population of between 100,000 and nearly 200,000 for a total of over 1.25 million people (Table 1). 2 Table 1: Test districts District Province 2001 Population Contract-out Ang Rokar Takeo 109,459 Memut Kampong Cham 109,321 Contract-in Cheung Prey Kampong Cham 167,725 Kirivong Takeo 197,623 Pearaing Prey Veng 188,854 Government Bati Takeo 164,006 KamChay Mear Prey Veng 112,403 Kruoch Chmar Kampong Cham 102,639 Preah Sdach Prey Veng 110,013 Source: Ministry of Health, Royal Government of Cambodia. NGOs were awarded four-year contracts at a fixed annual price per capita to administer and provide specific primary health care services. All winning bidders were international NGOs with previous experience working in Cambodia. Contract-out districts were responsible for purchasing their own supplies and materials and for paying labor costs. These expenses were included in the MOH budget for contract-in and government districts. Construction and renovation of health centers, referral (district) hospitals, and district health offices, as well as furniture and equipment were provided to all nine test districts and not included as expenditures under the contracts. The MOH retains ownership of these assets. Average annual recurrent expenditure per capita during the two-and-a-half year period was $3.88 for the contract-out districts; $2.40 for the contract-in districts; and $1.65 for the government districts (Table 2). The difference in expenditure levels between the contracted and government districts is accounted for largely by NGO technical assistance provided by district managers. Net of district management technical assistance, expenditure per capita for contract-in districts ($1.63) was nearly the same as government districts ($1.65). The higher expenditure level for contract-out districts ($2.60) is largely due to higher staff salaries. Table 2: Average annual recurrent expenditure per capita (in U.S. dollars) Expenditure category Contract out Contract in Government NGO technical assistance 1.28 0.77 0.0 Staff salariesa 1.32 0.55 0.53 Drugs, supplies, operating expensesb 1.28 1.08 1.12 Total 3.88 2.40 1.65 a. Salaries, bonuses, other allowances. b. Drugs, medical supplies, travel, fuel, per diem, office supplies, communications, building and vehicle maintenance and repair, utilities. Source: Schwartz (2001). 3 Research Questions This study addresses the following sets of questions: · Were primary health care services distributed equally before and after the contracting test? Which type of districts made the largest gains in reaching the poor between the pre- and post-contracting surveys? As is often the case in developing countries, we would expect an unequal distribution of health care services prior to the contracting test. Using bivariate statistics, we examine the equity of the distribution of health care services before and after the trial in each test district, as well as the direction and magnitude of change that during the trial, and compare contracted districts to government districts. · What factors other than wealth are related to an equitable distribution of primary health care services? When these factors are controlled, did the poor receive more health care services than the nonpoor in contracted or government districts? What are the policy implications of these findings? District managers faced different budget constraints to reach the poor and increase health service coverage, different baseline values for coverage and distribution of services, and possible differences in population demographics, all of which may have influenced resource allocation decisions. Recognizing these differences, we use multivariate methods to isolate the effect of contracting on the distribution of services to the poor while controlling for these other related factors. Methodology To identify the poor, principal components analysis is used to construct a wealth index of households. Concentration indices and multivariate regressions are used to test the hypothesis of whether the distribution of health services to the poor improved under contracting. Wealth Index In the absence of income or consumption data collected by the household surveys, household ownership of assets, which serve as a proxy for household wealth, is used as the basis for constructing a wealth index for the study. For comparisons between the baseline and mid-term surveys, the types of household assets used to construct the index were restricted to those included as questions in both household surveys. These eight assets include: whether there was a permanent type of roof on the house (brick, cement, metal, or a combination of these materials) and whether anyone in the household owned a bicycle, radio, motorcycle, television, oxcart, motor boat, or at least one cow. 4 The wealth index was constructed with coding for each asset set equal to one if the household had the asset, and equal to zero if not. Principal components analysis (PCA), which searches for the linear combination of the assets for the maximum possible variance in the data, was conducted, and the first principal component was retained (Filmer and Pritchett 1999; Wagstaff 2002). The PCA wealth index was used to rank households (and thereby the individuals in each household) in the sample as a whole for each of the two surveys, and constructed separately for each of the nine districts for each survey.2 We follow the approach used by Wagstaff and Watanabe (2002), using artificial convenient regressions to test for any statistically significant differences in the equity results from ranking individuals within each district compared with ranking individuals in the nine districts taken as a whole. The results of the tests indicate no statistically significant differences. That is, differences in the concentration indices for the nine districts based on a wealth ranking of households from all districts compared with a wealth ranking based on the households within each district, are not statistically significant. In absolute terms, an individual ranked as "poor" in one district would be equally ranked as poor in all other districts. This suggests that observed differences in the equity of health care services between the districts are not due to differences in wealth across districts and implies that the populations in the districts comprise a fairly homogeneous group of rural households in terms of asset ownership at the time of the two surveys.3 Concentration Indices Bivariate concentration indices are calculated to quantify the degree of income-related inequality for health care service indicators across the districts and across the surveys, using the Newey-West regression estimator, which corrects the standard error of the estimated concentration index for serial correlation of the fractional rank variable, as well as any heteroscedasticity (Wagstaff, Paci, and van Doorslaer 1991; Kakwani, Wagstaff, and Van Doolsaer 1997; Newey and West 1994). Need-Standardized Use of Public Health Facilities The use of public health facilities for treatment of illness requires standardization to correct for differences in the need to seek health care at a public health facility. We assume the need for the other health care services (e.g., child immunization, antenatal care, birth delivery by a trained professional, and so on.) is the same for all individuals targeted for each of these types of care. For the use of public health facilities due to illness, we follow the procedure developed by Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (2000) to take into account individuals' need for medical care. This procedure uses a two-step indirect standardization, with the estimation of a nonlinear prediction equation in the first step, to generate values of need-expected curative health care at a public facility. 2 An alternative index that weighted household assets by the scarcity of the assets was also tested and produced similar results. 3 The index constructed for each district is arbitrarily chosen to present the remaining results of the study. 5 To proxy the need for medical care, we include demographic dummy variables for gender and age categories in the estimation of a first-stage probit model for all individuals in each survey to obtain predictions of the probability that an individual will choose a public health facility for treatment of an illness.4 The Newey-West regression estimator is used in the second step to obtain the estimated concentration index and its standard error of the need-expected probability of seeking health care at a public health facility, and the indirectly standardized concentration index.5 Multivariate Method We examine the relative weight of factors that may be related to the receipt of health services using descriptive probit regressions. In this analysis, the attempt is not to model all factors that predict the receipt of services in each survey. Rather, we use the multivariate analysis as an extension to confirm the bivariate analysis and to test whether the simple correlations between wealth and receipt of services and between contract and no-contract districts hold when controlling for other related factors such as district expenditures, initial coverage levels, and population demographics. A probit regression is estimated for the pooled pre-contract (1997) and evaluation (2001) surveys for each of the health service indicators. Nature and Source of Data The baseline household survey was carried out in May­June 1997; the follow-up survey was conducted in June­August 2001, two-and-a-half years after the contractors were in place in the first quarter of 1998.6 The mid-term household survey used the same baseline survey instrument with few exceptions. A standard cluster survey methodology was used for the household surveys, with the sample size calculated to allow each district to be compared to its own performance statistics at the time of the follow-up survey. In each district, 30 villages (clusters) were selected randomly, stratified by health center catchment area with a probability proportionate to population size. The total population of each district was divided into 30 (clusters), giving a sampling interval of k, where each kth village was selected as a survey cluster. The probability of a village being selected was thus proportional to the size of the 4Use of public health facilities for only those who reported an illness, standardized for choosing a public health facility, also was tested and produced nearly identical results. 5Details of the method may be found in World Bank (2002). 6No significant change in service coverage was experienced between the baseline survey in mid-1997 until the contracting test commenced in 1999 due to the time required for the international bidding process, construction and rehabilitation of health facilities, and procurement of equipment. 6 population of that village.7 The same villages sampled in the baseline survey were resurveyed in the 2001 follow-up survey. Sample sizes were calculated to yield reliable estimates of: the immunization status of children between 12 and 23 months old, antenatal care and type of birth attendant. For immunization, seven children between 12 and 23 months old were required from each cluster to provide 210 children per district for estimates +/­10 percent with a 95 percent confidence interval. For antenatal and birth provider information, seven women who had given birth within the prior 12 months (including stillbirths but excluding miscarriages) were required from each cluster, or 210 women in each district, for estimates with a +/­ 10 percent with a 95 percent confidence interval.8 Thus, in each district, about 420 households were sampled, consisting of about 210 households with a child between 12 and 23 months old, and about 210 households with a woman who had given birth in the previous year. There was some overlapping of households where both conditions were met. In addition to child immunization and antenatal/birth provider information, data were also collected from all sampled households on socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, as well as on use of curative health care services by all individuals in each household. Because the average household size in both surveys is between five and six individuals, depending on the health care indicator, sample sizes range from around 210 children, 210 women, 420 households, to more than 2,000 individuals for each district. In total, more than 20,000 individuals are included in each household survey (Table 3). . 7Further details of village mapping, randomized selection of eligible households, sample sizes, within- district statistical confidence intervals, and survey instruments for household and health facility surveys are given in Keller and Schwartz (2001). 8The sample sizes include an adjustment of 2x for the clustering effect. It was assumed initially that 30 percent of women received antenatal care. 7 1002 804 414 014 904 314 214 614 514 414 3,711 households 7991 814 993 904 704 514 714 114 914 814 Total 317,3 1002 572,2 304,2 762,2 883,2 842,2 133,2 910,2 323,2 031,2 483,02 individuals 7991 Total 542,2 532,2 253,2 192,2 804,2 963,2 322,2 523,2 985,2 7 2,103 in 1002 616 925 855 345 174 195 824 506 215 358,4 sick weeks4t Individuals las reported 7991 694 325 015 404 965 945 335 762 606 754,4 se child old 1002 804 414 014 904 314 214 614 514 414 117,3 siz with months 7991 814 993 904 704 514 714 114 914 814 Women 6­23 317,3 Sample 3: 12 1002 012 902 012 012 012 012 012 902 012 with 888,1 8 prior in Table months Women 7991 112 991 212 502 502 112 202 102 022 birth 668,1 1002 643 153 353 243 333 843 823 543 243 880,3 6­59 months Child 7991 923 163 173 333 343 763 143 083 603 131,3 1002 802 802 902 702 302 902 702 502 402 068,1 (2001). 12­23 months Child 7991 302 791 691 691 902 602 602 812 491 528,1 Schwartz and rae Keller -out t ract rakoR Prey tume gnovri gn tnemn M ramhC hayC hcadS la Source: Distric ontC Ang M Contract-in eunghC Ki Pearai Gover itaB Tot Kam Kruoch Preah Health Care Indicators The contractual indicators used for service coverage are consistent with the priority topics most prominently noted in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and appearing most frequently in World Bank Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), with a focus on preventive child and maternal health care (e.g., child immunization and vitamin A, antenatal care, trained birth attendant delivery, delivery in a health facility, and use and knowledge of modern of birth-spacing methods). No specific coverage goal was given for the use of public health care facilities for curative care, only that the poor be targeted for services. Table 4 gives definitions of the health care indicators included in the contracts and goals. Baseline and follow-up values for the health care service indicators are given in Table 5. At the time of the mid-term survey in mid-2001, which was well before completion of the test at the end of 2002, most districts had already achieved several of the pre-defined contractual goals, which many people thought overly ambitious at the time the contracts were awarded. Increasingly marginal returns to initial large capital and labor investment likely were responsible for much of this early success. Still, the increases in indicators achieved by mid-2001 are impressive (Figure 1). The overall average in the nine districts for fully immunized children, for example, increased from 30.9 percent to 56.7 percent, almost doubling in two-and-a-half years (Table 6). Findings about Distribution Contracted districts outperformed the government districts with changes in the distribution of health care services from an initial pro-nonpoor distribution toward a more equitable or pro-poor distribution. Baseline Distribution As expected, the 1997 baseline distribution of health care services in the nine test districts is found to be inequitable in all districts, and largely to the disadvantage of the poor. Concentration indices for health care services, with negative values indicating a pro-poor distribution and positive values indicating a pro-non poor distribution, before and after the contracting test began are given in Table 7.9 Only one exception, the use of public facilities for illness in KamChay Mear, indicates a statistically significant distribution in favor of the poor before the contracting test began. Immunization, using a trained birth practitioner, and use and knowledge of modern birth 9A complete listing of concentration indices, standard errors, t-values and sample sizes for each indicator is available from the authors on request. 9 a cent) erp( 70 70 50 50 01 03 70 Increase Goal ehtnihrtbi in eth ery in liveda .gni and ess gave .r odshtem illnr fo onthsm withne yea whone h-spacrtbi ng ter) cen wom past of 6­59 wom for the h-spacirtbi arec goals aged for antst in hodtem health once assi livery odernm ary children coverage by eastl at caldiem dea odernma ng reom prim or and onthsm ent or withne or r,o usiyl four 12 wom hospital doct hs. past easuremm know e,f for currentdol hs (district definitions ontm the in dwiim ility hs fac ontm pressure ontm 24ro 10 facilities 12­23 twice indicator rendl oodblht nurse,deifil health 6­23 care public chi received or agedl . health a. service for oni Ani wistsivi quaa was public zat vitam carela privatea chievilaht priehtnihrtbi them gave bodimaC Health obtain of 4: noitinifeD unimmil nate year. was to district nte Ful High-dose ant2> prior ndantetathrtiB in year. past winemo whonemo ofe weeks.4ro the Birth W W where Us pri Table )SB )S ecified.ps (KB not GovernmlayoR,ht (M (TDEL) ng (USE) EL) goal Heal ) onal (FD hodtem (FICdl ng spacihrtbi of facilities percentage professi facility care rystnii M chi (ANC) zed (VITA) nedairt ecificpS healtha spacihrtbi odernm health of rotacidnI unimmiyl care a. Source: Ani by in tala public ten eryvi odernm dgee of Ful Vitam An Del Delivery Use Knowl Use 1002 3.51 1.7 5.3 2.5 3.5 1.5 4.1 2.3 9.1 USE 7991 4.0 9.0 7.1 7.0 4.0 8.0 1.1 9.0 1.1 1002 7.09 9.85 8.75 9.08 3.66 4.58 6.77 3.46 6.86 KBS 7991 7.11 5.91 0.22 9.71 2.12 4.61 0.02 7.72 9.21 1002 3.92 1.73 9.92 2.53 0.33 2.72 7.32 6.42 2.92 MBS surveys(percent) 7991 9.8 3.71 8.71 3.51 9.21 6.51 7.01 8.31 5.61 2001 1002 2.61 0.11 6.7 6.8 5.91 4.21 8.4 0.9 9.1 and FDEL 1997 7991 9.9 0.2 4.2 8.4 9.2 2.5 5.0 9.4 3.2 1002 4.24 7.52 4.12 8.42 6.25 5.94 8.42 9.13 8.31 district, TDEL by 7991 6 43. 9.81 8.82 2.31 7.93 6.34 9.41 9 28. 5.01 11 sy coverage 1002 2.56 1.24 9.35 7.63 2.52 4.24 2.61 5.12 5.01 Surve d ANC service 7991 4.02 1.6 2.22 7.01 3.4 1.71 5.3 4.61 0.5 Househol care 1002 8.35 8.75 5.83 9.26 0.46 9.65 1.43 4.42 9.83 ermdti M VITA Health 7991 5.82 1.74 1.05 5.64 2.33 5.64 4.63 5.05 7.23 .sm 5: andeni Table 1002 2.75 6.37 8.94 8.16 7.35 6.67 6.04 8.86 9.72 acrony ofs selaB ngi FIC 7991 1.72 3.32 5.62 8.04 4.32 5.46 3.42 7.13 5.51 outl ract spel ontCa rae -out ract rakoR n-i M Prey gn ramhC for4eblat bodimaC ract hayC hcadS See:te District ontC tume Ang M ontC eunghC gnovri Ki Pearai Government itaB Kam Kruoch Preah No Source: Figure 1: Changes in health care coverage rates, 1997­2001 (percentage points) 70.0 60.0 st 50.0 inoP 40.0 egatnecr 30.0 Pe in 20.0 egnahC 10.0 0.0 FIC VITA ANC TDEL FDEL MBS KBS USE -10.0 Contract-out Contract-in Government Note: See table 4 for spell outs of acronyms. Source: Cambodia Contracting Baseline and Midterm Household Surveys . Table 6: Changes in health care service coverage, 1997-2001 (percentage points) District FIC VITA ANC TDEL FDEL MBS KBS USE Contract-out Ang Rokar 30.1 25.2 44.7 ­1.2 6.2 20.4 79.0 14.9 Memut 50.2 10.7 36.0 6.8 9.0 19.8 49.4 6.2 Contract-in Cheung Prey 23.3 ­11.5 31.7 ­7.8 5.2 12.0 35.8 1.8 Kirivong 21.0 16.4 26.0 11.6 3.7 19.9 73.0 4.5 Pearaing 30.3 30.8 20.8 12.9 16.6 20.1 45.1 4.9 Government Bati 12.0 10.3 25.3 5.9 7.2 11.6 70.5 4.3 KamChay Mear 16.3 ­2.3 12.7 9.9 4.3 13.0 57.6 0.3 Kruoch Chmar 37.1 ­26.2 5.1 3.0 4.1 10.8 36.6 2.3 Preah Sdach 12.4 6.2 5.5 3.3 ­0.4 12.7 55.7 0.8 Note: See table 4 for spell outs of acronyms. Source: Cambodia Contracting Baseline and Midterm Household Surveys 12 1002 a a a a ­.091 ­.096 .127 850.­ 570. 150.­ 431. 490. .296 USE 7991 150. 632. 560. 400. 270. 301.­ a ­.287 451.­ 742. 1002 ­.007 620. ­.010 900. 600.­ 010. a 012. 040. 900. KBS 7991 710.­ a .444 470. 420. *011. 190. a 922. 770. 100. 1002 400. 320. 900.­ 110. 070.­ 261. a 461. 892. 120. MBS 7991 300.­ a .197 211.­ 811. 770.­ 471. a a a .251 .180 .175 surveys 1002 781. a a a .399 .175 ­.439 .185 .129 .205 .359 .024 2001 FDEL 7991 a and .371 233. 822. 432.­ 940. 041.­ 333.­ 271. 922. 1997 1002 L 990.­ a a 981. 231. 013.­ a 131. 924. a a a .273 .269 .297 TDE indices, 7991 a a .100 392. 020. 501.­ a 811. 130. 220. 660. 681. 13 s 1002 a ­.020 .136 230. 843.­ a .189 240. a a a .316 .291 .508 Surveyd ANC Concentration 7991 a .011 .439 750. ­.136 .230 710. ­.112 251. .225 7: Househol 1002 ­.028 310. 920. 100. 300. 300. a .113 .059 Table A ­.029 ermdti M VIT 7991 ­.030 700. 250. 550.­ a .094 950. .038 710. .042 .sm l.e andeni 1002 ­.028 220. 600. 620. ­.015 400.­ a .058 180. acrony ­.031 ofs lev5.0eth selaB ngi FIC 7991 a a a .131 .178 .159 660. .172 040. a outl att ract ­.021 .182 .021 spel ficanin ontCa sig ear -out n-i M Prey ramhC for4eblat bodimaC t ract okarR ng ract hayC Sdach See:te Statistically No a. Source: .. Distric ontC tume Ang M ontC eunghC gnovri Ki Pearai Government itaB Kam Kruoch Preah spacing account for the most of the remaining statistically significant indices that have relatively large inequality levels in favor of the nonpoor. Eight of these concentration indices are in the two districts that would be contracted-out (Ang Rokar and Memut), and these indicate the highest level of inequality for five of the nine health care indicators. Of the three districts that would be contracted-in, one (Pearaing) has three statistically significant and positive health service indices (vitamin A, trained birth delivery, knowledge of modern birth spacing), and another (Cheung Prey) has one, fully immunized child (FIC). Five of the nine health care services in the districts to be contracted-in do not have statistically significant indices, suggesting that the concentration index is not different from zero, or a wealth-neutral distribution of these services at the baseline. The remaining eight statistically significant indices are spread over the four government districts that would be used for comparisons in the contracting test. These indicate three of the government districts have pro-nonpoor distributions for the use of modern birth spacing. Four of the health care services in these districts do not have statistically significant indices (vitamin A, antenatal care, trained birth practitioner, and facility delivery), suggesting an equitable distribution of these services. Follow-Up Distribution Two-and-a-half years into the contracting test, the distribution of health care services overall appear to have shifted toward a more equitable, or less nonpoor distribution across the nine districts but, with few exceptions, not distributed toward the poor. In 2001, contracted-out districts are found to have pro-poor use of public facilities. More than half of the concentration indices found for three of the four government districts are in favor of the nonpoor, however, and these are spread across all health care services. The remaining government district (Bati) appears to be an exception, with no statistically significant concentration indices in 2001, indicating an equal distribution of services across poor and nonpoor groups. Changes between the Baseline and Follow-Up Surveys Perhaps more important than the static results found for the baseline and mid-term surveys, the direction and magnitude of changes in concentration indices suggest that the provision of health care services in contracted districts has become more equitable or more pro-poor during the two-and-a-half years that contracting test has been in place (figure 2). The direction, magnitude, and statistical significance of changes in the concentration indices between the baseline and mid-term surveys are given in table 8. Of the statistically significant changes in concentration indices, all found for the contracted-out districts show movement toward improving equity in the provision of health care services. Negative values, indicating an increase in a pro-poor distribution (or a decrease in a pro-nonpoor distribution) are found for immunization, trained birth delivery, knowledge of birth-spacing methods, and use of public facilities in contract-out districts. 14 Figure 2: Changes in concentration indices, 1997­2001 0.300 0.200 exdnI noi 0.100 atrt cennoC 0.000 ni eg -0.100 anhC FIC VITA ANC TDEL FDEL MBS KBS USE -0.200 -0.300 Pro-poor Contract-out Contract-int Government Note: See Table 4 for explanations of acronyms. Source: Cambodia Contracting Baseline and Midterm Household Surveys. Table 8: Changes in concentration indices, 1997­2001 District FIC VITA ANC TDEL FDEL MBS KBS USE Contract-out Ang Rokar ­.159 a .003 ­.031 ­.199 a ­.184 .006 .010 ­.142 a Memut ­.156 a .006 ­.303 ­.104 .067 ­.173 ­.419 a ­.333 a Contract-in Cheung Prey ­.154 a ­.024 ­.026 .112 ­.054 .104 ­.084 .062 Kirivong ­.039 .056 ­.212 ­.205 ­.206 ­.107 ­.015 ­.061 Pearaing ­.187 a ­.092 ­.041 .013 .136 .007 ­.116 a .004 Government Bati ­.044 ­.056 .006 .398 .269 ­.012 ­.082 .052 KamChay Mear .079 ­.067 .427 a .251 a .538 ­.088 ­.019 a .421 a Kruoch Chmar ­.101 .096 .139 .203 a .187 .118 ­.038 .247 Preah Sdach ­.052 .018 .282 .111 ­.205 ­.155 .008 .049 a. Statistically significant at the .05 level. Source: Cambodia Contracting Baseline and Midterm Household Surveys. 15 Similarly for contracted-in districts, all of the statistically significant changes in concentration indices show movement toward a more pro-poor distribution of health care services, including immunization and knowledge of modern birth spacing. In contrast, all but one statistically significant change in concentration indices found for the government districts show movement toward a nonpoor distribution of services. All are found for the same three government districts also found to have pro-nonpoor distributions in the 2001 survey. Multivariate Results The multivariate results are consistent with the findings of the bivariate concentration indices. In other words, the contracted districts better targeted the poorest half of the population than the government districts, when controlling for differences in district expenditures and demographic characteristics. District managers in contracted districts appear to be more responsive and effective at organizing, managing, and monitoring service delivery to reach the poor than district managers in government districts, all else equal. For each of the health care services, we include time (2001 survey), being among the poorest half of households, district location (colinear with district expenditures), and mother and child characteristics as categorical (dummy) variables in probit regressions to examine the relative weight of each factor on the likelihood of an individual's receiving the health care service. In addition, we include interaction terms for being from the poorest half of the households, being in a contracted district, and time (2001 survey) to examine more systematically the effect of contracting on the distribution of services. The probit results for the pooled baseline and follow-up survey data are given in Table 9, including estimated (transformed) coefficients, which show the effect on the probability of receiving each service for a discrete change of each dummy variable (omitted category noted) from zero to one (dF/dx) while holding all else constant.10 Underlying coefficients found to be statistically significant at the .01 level are noted. The regression coefficients were obtained using STATA statistical software, with a probit estimation, and the transformed coefficients (dF/dx), or marginal effects, were obtained using the dprobit STATA command. The transformed coefficients indicate the independent effect on the predicted probability from changing each categorical variable relative to the omitted variable. The standard errors of coefficient estimates are corrected for multiple observations in villages using the cluster option. 10The results shown for child immunization were previously reported in Schwartz and Bhushan (2003). 16 USE .198* .038* .124* ­.106* *322. *980. 020. *140. *830. *050. .015 .029 and KBS .558* ­.063* .059* .007 *770. *401. 930.­ 500.­ ­.011 *770. -- .090* .043 .075* .104* .186* .077* .083* .096* .057 .025 baseline SB M pooled .140* ­.050* .066* ­.005 *500. *610. 610.­ 410.­ 040.­ 730.­ -- ­.070* ­.053* ­.006 .030* .070* .116* .115* .126* .079 .061 the in LEDF .057* ­.019 .013 ­.015 *411. *170. *930. *450. 101. *870. -- ­.001 .065* ­.010 .025* .089* ­.006 ­.024 ­.013 ­.022* ­.010 received LEDT .066* .066* ­.054 550. -- services ­.049* *503. *651. *851. *943. *253. .088* .212* .060* .122* .258* ­.033 ­.057 ­.078* ­.095* ­.050 health of CNA .263* ­.009 .145* ­.132* *763. *702. *353. *351. 320. *852. -- .009 .156* .073* .108* .187* .053 .059* .041 .030 ­.022 ility surveys up- probab ATIV 17 .073* ­.011 .107* 800. ­.068* *531. 550. *051. *380. *631. ­.014 .007 ­.020 .040* .063* .086 .115* .156* .113* .099* .008 the follow on CIF .249* ­.072* .085* .009 *561. *582. *941. *472. *921. *544. .108* .279* .069* .118* .185* .019 .031 .056 .037 .001 .032* (dF/dx) effects survey marginal results, 2001,ctristdi ) res)ut res)ut ed ) Probit ract survey ittedmo expendi expendi itted=none) expenditures) 9: survey ht f s cont,f 2001,f (om ach mu Sd ghestih( ittedmo02 (lowest elam Table elbairaV w-upol weald termn (borP 2RoduesP doohielkil Log The most striking results are found for the independent effect of the interaction term for household wealth, location in a contracted district, and time (2001 survey). The statistically significant and positive results suggest that individuals from the poorest half of households in contracted districts in 2001 were more likely to receive health care services. 11 Because the district location variable is perfectly collinear with per capita expenditures in each district, the independent effect of district location captures differences in expenditure levels as well as other district-specific health delivery system management, implementation methods, and supervision. The district location variables are found to be positive and statistically significant independent factors of the likelihood of receiving services relative to the omitted low-performing government district, when controlling for other factors included in the estimation. A child living in Memut, for example, is estimated to have a 0.285 higher probability of being fully immunized than one living in Preah Sdach, the omitted government district. On the other hand, residence in any of the three included government districts is also found to be a statistically significant and positive factor in the probability of FIC relative to the omitted government district, and these effects are seen to be large. A child living in Bati, for example, had a 0.445 higher probability of being fully immunized than one living in Preah Sdach. While the coverage statistics indicated all districts increased FIC coverage, the multivariate results for the pooled sample, when controlling for other factors, appear to give added weight for large increases in FIC (Memut, Krouch Chmar), and for sustained relatively high FIC coverage (Bati, Kirivong). The independent effect of an observation being from the follow-up survey on the likelihood of receiving each of the health care services is positive and statistically significant, and suggests that all individuals, regardless of location and other factors, are more likely to receive these health care services in 2001 than at the time of the baseline survey. These results are consistent with the increases in health care service coverage rates shown in Table 6. The results for the independent effect of wealth in the pooled baseline and follow-up sample suggest that individuals from the poorest half of the population are less likely to receive child immunization, a trained birth attendant and to know and use modern birth- spacing methods but are more likely to use public facilities for illness. In addition, the results found for the interaction term for being an individual from the poorest half of households at the time of the follow-up survey in 2001 suggest that these individuals were less likely to receive vitamin A and antenatal care and to use public facilities. Together, these results suggest that, in all districts being poor was, and still is, associated with a lower likelihood of receiving health care services. The results are consistent with the bivariate concentration indices in table 7, which indicate that few health care services are well targeted to the poor in any of the districts, contracted or not. 11An exception is birth delivery in a health facility found to be positive but not statistically significant. 19 The results found for the control variables for mother and child characteristics suggest that better educated mothers are positively associated with a higher likelihood of a child's chances of receiving health care services, a common finding in the literature. Limitations The study is limited by an inability to identify the differences in underlying motivations, resource allocation decisions, incentives and district manager's service delivery and monitoring methods. These shortcomings may have led to the observed differences in the distribution of health care services favoring the poor in contracted districts compared with government districts. Until further research is conducted, we can only speculate about the reasons. Perhaps the international NGO managers were better trained than their local counterparts in management, implementation, supervision, and monitoring methods to target the poor. Perhaps the NGO district managers expected future personal rewards if they achieved all goals--reaching the poor and coverage increases. Because this was the first large-scale contracting experience for the NGOs, perhaps proven managers were assigned to Cambodia to better ensure success, maintain a good reputation for providing health care services in developing countries, and even possibly be awarded a follow-on contract or contracts in other countries. Perhaps higher guaranteed wages and bonuses paid to health care workers in contracted districts provided more effective motivation to attain contractual goals--and more than compensated for unofficial fees and bonuses collected by government health care workers. These types of questions need further investigation generally and in other more recent large-scale contracting projects such as those in Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Implications The Cambodia contracting test is the first known large-scale test with suitable baseline and follow-up survey data to examine systematically whether NGO contracts are an effective means of providing health care services that reach the poor. This chapter compares contracted districts with noncontracted government districts to see which were successful in targeting health care services to the poorest half of households, an equity goal for all districts included in the test, using data from 1997 baseline and 2001 follow- up household surveys. Bivariate concentration indices and multivariate analysis results are consistent. They suggest that, although all districts increased health care service coverage, the contracted districts outperformed the government districts in targeting services to the poor, even when controlling for other factors, including differences in expenditure levels, starting values, and demographics. It is difficult to generalize to other countries the results of the contracting experience on reaching the poor in Cambodia. The lack of physical infrastructure and the large numbers 20 of entrenched government health care workers in rural areas of Cambodia at the start of the contracting test lent themselves to innovative approaches such as rational redelineation of operational districts and testing new service delivery methods to rapidly rebuild the primary health care system. The circumstances are similar in densely populated urban areas in the four largest cities of Bangladesh and the rural areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan. The results of these large-scale contracting projects could help answer the question of whether experience in Cambodia provides an effective model for other developing countries. 21 22 References Bhushan, Indu, Sheryl Keller, and J. Brad Schwartz. 2002. Achieving the Twin Objectives of Efficiency and Equity: Contracting Health Services in Cambodia. ERD Policy Brief, Number 6. Manila: Asian Development Bank, Economics and Research Department. Filmer, Deon, and Lant Pritchett. 1999. "The Effect of Household Wealth on Educational Attainment: Evidence from 35 countries." Population and Development Review 25(1): 85­120. Kakwani, Nanak, Adam Wagstaff, and Eddy van Doorslaer. 1997. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health: Measurement, Computation, and Statistical Inference." Journal of Econometrics 77 (1): 87­104. Keller, Sheryl, and J. Brad Schwartz. 2001. "Evaluation Report: Contracting for Health Services Pilot Project." Asian Development Bank, Social Sectors Division, Mekong Department. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Unpublished. Loevinsohn, Benjamin. 2000. "Contracting for the Delivery of Primary Health Care in Cambodia: Design and Initial Experience of a Large Pilot-Test." WBI Online Journal. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Newey, W. K., and K. D. West. 1994. "Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation." Review of Economic Studies. 61(4): 631­53. Schwartz, J. Brad. 2001. "Cost-Effectiveness of Contracting Health Care Services in Cambodia." Manila: Asian Development Bank, Social Sectors Division, Mekong Department. Unpublished. Schwartz, J. Brad, and Indu Bhushan. 2003. "Improving Equity in Immunization through Public-Private Partnership in Cambodia." University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Asian Development Bank. Forthcoming. Schwartz, J. Brad, and Benjamin Loevinsohn. 1999. Sustaining Effective Social Programs: Financing Immunization in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Viet Nam. Manila: Asian Development Bank, Education, Health and Population (West) Division. National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health (Cambodia), and ORC Macro. 2000. National Health Survey 1998. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Wagstaff, Adam. 2002. "Inequalities in Health in Developing Countries: Swimming against the Tide?" Working paper. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Wagstaff, Adam, and E. van Doorslaer. 2000. "Measuring and Testing for Inequity in the Delivery of Health Care." Journal of Human Resources. 35(4): 716­33. Wagstaff, Adam, P. Paci, and Eddy van Doorslaer. 1991. "On the Measurement of Inequalities in Health." Social Science and Medicine. (33) 545­57. Wagstaff, Adam, and Naoko Watanabe. 2002. What Difference Does the Choice of SES Make in Health Inequality Measurement? Technical Note. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. World Bank. 2002. Quantitative Techniques for Health Equity Analysis Technical Notes. Technical Note 13. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. 23 About this series... This series is produced by the Health, Nutrition, and Population Family (HNP) of the World Bank's Human Development Network. The papers in this series aim to provide a vehicle for publishing preliminary and unpolished results on HNP topics to encourage discussion and debate. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Citation and the use of material presented in this series should take into account this provisional character. For free copies of papers in this series please contact the individual authors whose name appears on the paper. Enquiries about the series and submissions should be made directly to the Managing Editor Joy de Beyer (jdebeyer@worldbank.org) or HNP Advisory Service (healthpop@worldbank.org, tel 202 473-2256, fax 202 522-3234). For more information, see also www.worldbank.org/ hnppublications. THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC USA 20433 Telephone: 202 477 1234 Facsimile: 202 477 6391 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: feedback@worldbank.org