Local Inequality and Project Choice: Theory and Evidence from Ecuador

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

collection.link.5
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9
collection.name.5
Policy Research Working Papers
dc.contributor.author
Araujo, M. Caridad
dc.contributor.author
Ferreira, Francisco H.G.
dc.contributor.author
Lanjouw, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Özler, Berk
dc.date.accessioned
2012-06-26T20:41:47Z
dc.date.available
2012-06-26T20:41:47Z
dc.date.issued
2006-08
dc.date.lastModified
2021-04-23T14:02:41Z
dc.description.abstract
This paper provides evidence consistent with elite capture of Social Fund investment projects in Ecuador. Exploiting a unique combination of data-sets on village-level income distributions, Social Fund project administration, and province level electoral results, the authors test a simple model of project choice when local political power is unequally distributed. In accordance with the predictions of the model, poorer villages are more likely to receive projects that provide excludable (private) goods to the poor, such as latrines. Controlling for poverty, more unequal communities are less likely to receive such projects. Consistent with the hypothesis of elite capture, these results are sensitive to the specific measure of inequality used in the empirical analysis, and are strongest for expenditure shares at the top of the distribution.
en
dc.identifier
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/08/7014478/local-inequality-project-choice-theory-evidence-ecuador
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9289
dc.language
English
dc.language.iso
en_US
dc.publisher
World Bank, Washington, DC
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3997
dc.rights
CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holder
World Bank
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subject
ACCESS TO SERVICES
dc.subject
AGRICULTURE
dc.subject
ANTI-POVERTY
dc.subject
BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE
dc.subject
BENEFICIARIES
dc.subject
BENEFICIARY ASSESSMENTS
dc.subject
CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject
COMMUNITY GROUPS
dc.subject
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
dc.subject
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
dc.subject
CORRUPTION
dc.subject
DECENTRALIZATION
dc.subject
DEMAND-DRIVEN APPROACH
dc.subject
DEMOCRACY
dc.subject
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
dc.subject
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
dc.subject
ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
dc.subject
ECONOMIC STATUS
dc.subject
EQUILIBRIUM
dc.subject
ESTIMATES OF POVERTY
dc.subject
FOOD FOR EDUCATION
dc.subject
GEOGRAPHIC TARGETING
dc.subject
GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
HIGHER INEQUALITY
dc.subject
HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION
dc.subject
HOUSEHOLD LEVEL
dc.subject
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
dc.subject
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
dc.subject
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
dc.subject
INCOME
dc.subject
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
dc.subject
INCOME INEQUALITY
dc.subject
INCOME LEVELS
dc.subject
INCOME TRANSFERS
dc.subject
INDICATOR OF POVERTY
dc.subject
INEQUALITY
dc.subject
INFORMATION SYSTEM
dc.subject
IRRIGATION
dc.subject
LAND INEQUALITY
dc.subject
LARGE POPULATIONS
dc.subject
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subject
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
dc.subject
LORENZ CURVE
dc.subject
MACROECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT
dc.subject
NATIONAL LEVEL
dc.subject
NGO
dc.subject
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
dc.subject
NUTRITION
dc.subject
PARTICIPATORY
dc.subject
POLICY RESEARCH
dc.subject
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER
dc.subject
POLITICAL POWER
dc.subject
POLITICAL PROCESS
dc.subject
POLITICAL SUPPORT
dc.subject
POOR
dc.subject
POOR AGENTS
dc.subject
POOR COMMUNITIES
dc.subject
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
dc.subject
POOR INDIVIDUALS
dc.subject
POOR PEOPLE
dc.subject
POPULATION CENSUS
dc.subject
POVERTY INCIDENCE
dc.subject
POVERTY LINE
dc.subject
POVERTY MAP
dc.subject
POVERTY PROGRAMS
dc.subject
POVERTY REDUCTION
dc.subject
PRODUCTION FUNCTION
dc.subject
PROGRESS
dc.subject
PROJECT MONITORING
dc.subject
PUBLIC GOOD
dc.subject
PUBLIC SPENDING
dc.subject
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
dc.subject
RESPECT
dc.subject
RICHER PEOPLE
dc.subject
RURAL
dc.subject
RURAL ECONOMY
dc.subject
RURAL POVERTY
dc.subject
RURAL POVERTY RATES
dc.subject
RURAL SECTOR
dc.subject
SANITATION
dc.subject
SCHOOL BUILDINGS
dc.subject
SOCIAL FUND PROJECTS
dc.subject
SOCIAL FUNDS
dc.subject
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE
dc.subject
SOCIAL SERVICES
dc.subject
SOCIAL WELFARE
dc.subject
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
dc.subject
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
dc.subject
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMS
dc.subject
TARGETING
dc.subject
URBAN AREAS
dc.subject
UTILITY FUNCTION
dc.subject
VALUATION
dc.subject
VOTERS
dc.subject
WEALTH
dc.title
Local Inequality and Project Choice: Theory and Evidence from Ecuador
en
okr.doctype
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
okr.doctype
Publications & Research
okr.docurl
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/08/7014478/local-inequality-project-choice-theory-evidence-ecuador
okr.globalpractice
Macroeconomics and Fiscal Management
okr.globalpractice
Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience
okr.globalpractice
Poverty
okr.globalpractice
Health, Nutrition, and Population
okr.googlescholar.linkpresent
yes
okr.identifier.doi
10.1596/1813-9450-3997
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum
000016406_20060825123420
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum
7014478
okr.identifier.report
WPS3997
okr.language.supported
en
okr.pdfurl
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2006/08/25/000016406_20060825123420/Rendered/PDF/wps3997.pdf
en
okr.region.administrative
Latin America & Caribbean
okr.region.country
Ecuador
okr.topic
Economic Theory and Research
okr.topic
Services and Transfers to Poor
okr.topic
Health, Nutrition and Population :: Population Policies
okr.topic
Poverty Reduction :: Rural Poverty Reduction
okr.topic
Poverty Monitoring and Analysis
okr.topic
Macroeconomics and Economic Growth
okr.topic
Health, Nutrition and Population
okr.topic
Rural Development
okr.unit
Development Research Group (DECRG)
okr.volume
1 of 1

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación



Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)