Report

Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

collection.link.90
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2198
collection.name.90
Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment
dc.contributor.author
World Bank
dc.date.accessioned
2015-12-08T20:28:14Z
dc.date.available
2015-12-08T20:28:14Z
dc.date.issued
2015-11
dc.date.lastModified
2021-04-23T14:04:13Z
dc.description.abstract
The World Bank published a Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) of the Bulgarian justice sector entitled “Resourcing the Judiciary for Performance and Accountability: A Judicial Public Expenditure and Institutional Review” in 2008. The objective of the present study is to conduct an assessment of the spending and institutional changes in Bulgaria’s judiciary from 2008 onwards. The current report examines the principal trends in resourcing Bulgaria’s judiciary since 2008, while comparing the expenditure and judicial performance with those of other European countries. The report provides a set of conclusion and recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of Bulgaria’s judiciary and the judicial budget process.
en
dc.identifier
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/11/25301298/bulgaria-judicial-performance-caseload-expenditure-review-2008-2014
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23239
dc.language
English
dc.language.iso
en_US
dc.publisher
Washington, DC
dc.rights
CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holder
World Bank
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subject
BENEFIT
dc.subject
COURT
dc.subject
FINANCING
dc.subject
QUALITY OF JUSTICE
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
dc.subject
CRIMINAL
dc.subject
JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
dc.subject
LAWS
dc.subject
GUARANTEES
dc.subject
SALARY
dc.subject
APPELLATE COURTS
dc.subject
GOOD GOVERNANCE
dc.subject
ASSET
dc.subject
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subject
RESTRUCTURING PLAN
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
dc.subject
REORGANIZATION
dc.subject
REGULATORY REFORMS
dc.subject
SALARIES
dc.subject
SUBSIDY
dc.subject
LEGAL ENTITIES
dc.subject
CRIME
dc.subject
CORRUPTION
dc.subject
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
dc.subject
WILL
dc.subject
PAYMENTS
dc.subject
COURT RESTRUCTURING
dc.subject
BUDGET
dc.subject
RESIGNATION
dc.subject
ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
dc.subject
JURISDICTIONS
dc.subject
COURTS
dc.subject
ARBITRATION
dc.subject
JUDICIAL STATISTICS
dc.subject
DISPOSITIONS
dc.subject
PENALTIES
dc.subject
JUDICIAL POSITIONS
dc.subject
TITLE
dc.subject
JUDGE
dc.subject
PROSECUTORS
dc.subject
RESTRUCTURING
dc.subject
JUDICIAL REFORM
dc.subject
MAGISTRATES
dc.subject
COURT HEARING
dc.subject
DOMICILE
dc.subject
EU
dc.subject
CASES
dc.subject
JUDGES
dc.subject
LEGISLATION
dc.subject
SOCIAL SECURITY
dc.subject
RESEARCH
dc.subject
JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES
dc.subject
DISTRICT COURTS
dc.subject
LEGALITY
dc.subject
AUDIT OFFICE
dc.subject
JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subject
RULE OF LAW
dc.subject
SUBSIDIES
dc.subject
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL POWER
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
dc.subject
REGULATIONS
dc.subject
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
dc.subject
JURISDICTION
dc.subject
WAGES
dc.subject
IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES
dc.subject
INSUFFICIENT FUNDS
dc.subject
POLICE
dc.subject
CRIMES
dc.subject
BUDGETS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL COUNCIL
dc.subject
CLAIMS
dc.subject
PERFORMANCE OF JUDICIARY
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SERVICES
dc.subject
RESTRUCTURING PROCESS
dc.subject
OFFENCES
dc.subject
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
dc.subject
AGENCIES
dc.subject
PROPERTY
dc.subject
LEGAL AID
dc.subject
PROPERTIES
dc.subject
ACCOUNTANT
dc.subject
COURT FILING
dc.subject
ASSETS
dc.subject
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
dc.subject
JUDICIAL BRANCH
dc.subject
MILITARY COURTS
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
dc.subject
CLAIMANTS
dc.subject
CAPITAL GOODS
dc.subject
ENFORCEMENT
dc.subject
ECONOMIC STAGNATION
dc.subject
JUSTICE
dc.subject
HUMAN RIGHTS
dc.subject
FAIR TRIAL
dc.subject
EXISTING LAW
dc.subject
DISMISSAL
dc.subject
NATIONAL BANK
dc.subject
COURT PROCESSES
dc.subject
LEGAL PERSONS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS
dc.subject
LEGAL CHANGES
dc.subject
COURT OF APPEAL
dc.subject
JUDICIARY
dc.subject
CRIMINAL CASES
dc.subject
JUDGMENTS
dc.subject
DISPOSITION
dc.subject
JUDICIAL RESOURCES
dc.subject
RESTRUCTURING PROGRAM
dc.subject
LAW
dc.subject
JUSTICE SYSTEM
dc.subject
INVESTIGATORS
dc.subject
COURT SYSTEMS
dc.subject
EXCHANGE RATE
dc.subject
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
JUDICIAL REVIEW
dc.subject
JUDICIAL STAFF
dc.subject
COURT STATISTICS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SECTOR
dc.subject
JUVENILE JUSTICE
dc.subject
GUARANTEE
dc.subject
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION
dc.subject
COURT SYSTEM
dc.subject
JUDICIAL BODIES
dc.subject
ESTATE
dc.title
Bulgaria Judicial Performance, Caseload and Expenditure Review (2008-2014)
en
dc.type
Report
en
okr.date.disclosure
2015-11-11
okr.doctype
Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment
okr.docurl
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/11/25301298/bulgaria-judicial-performance-caseload-expenditure-review-2008-2014
okr.googlescholar.linkpresent
yes
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum
090224b0831ae27b_1_0
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum
25301298
okr.identifier.report
100933
okr.imported
true
okr.language.supported
en
okr.pdfurl
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/11/11/090224b0831ae27b/1_0/Rendered/PDF/Bulgaria000jud0e0review002008020140.pdf
en
okr.region.administrative
Europe and Central Asia
okr.region.country
Bulgaria
okr.sector
Public Administration, Law, and Justice
okr.theme
Public sector governance :: Decentralization
okr.topic
Legal Institutions of the Market Economy
okr.topic
Law and Development
okr.topic
Public Sector Development
okr.topic
Law and Development :: Judicial System Reform
okr.topic
Finance and Financial Sector Development :: Bankruptcy and Resolution of Financial Distress
okr.topic
Gender :: Gender and Law
okr.unit
GOV PSP - ECA (GGO15)

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación



Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)