Book

Uganda Country Assistance Evaluation, 2001-2007 : Joint IEG/OPEV Country Assistance Evaluation

Show simple item record

collection.link.25
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2132
collection.name.25
IEG Independent Evaluations & Annual Reviews
dc.contributor.author
Independent Evaluation Group
dc.contributor.author
Africa Development Bank
dc.date.accessioned
2015-10-08T18:12:34Z
dc.date.available
2015-10-08T18:12:34Z
dc.date.issued
2009
dc.description.abstract
The World Bank’s assistance strategies showed strong client orientation and were aligned with Uganda’s poverty reduction strategy. The programs were substantially effective in decentralization, public sector reform, growth and economic transformation, education, and water and sanitation. However, more could have been done to help counter the perception of increasing corruption, improve power supply, reduce transport costs, enhance agricultural productivity, and help with family planning and reproductive health. The AfDB’s assistance was also relevant and aligned with the government’s development goals. Its support substantially achieved its objectives for decentralization, public sector finance, growth and economic transformation, improved competitiveness, agriculture, and water and sanitation, as well as education and health. However, there were some shortcomings in the assistance provided for power and roads and in reducing corruption. This report evaluates World Bank and African Development Bank assistance to Uganda during 2001-07. The motivation to undertake a joint evaluation was the shift to a common strategic framework, the Uganda Joint Assistance Strategy (UJAS), to guide the formulation and delivery of their programs. Under a common strategic framework joint evaluation is, in principal, more cost effective than the equivalent separate evaluations, since at least some aspects of the evaluation can be done together. This also helps to reduce government transaction costs. The evaluation discusses the outcome of the support of each bank, rates each independently, noting that the two banks are of different size, capacity, and institutional setting. In addition, the two banks have programs that were not implemented jointly but in parallel, although they regularly engaged with one another as development partners. The outcome ratings for the two institutions are therefore not comparable and should not be used to imply that one institution did ‘better’ than the other.
en
dc.identifier
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/10/25126425/uganda-country-assistance-evaluation-2001-2007
dc.identifier.isbn
978-1-60244-141-5
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22742
dc.language
English
dc.language.iso
en_US
dc.publisher
Washington, DC: World Bank
dc.rights
CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holder
World Bank
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subject
TARIFFS
dc.subject
RISKS
dc.subject
FISH
dc.subject
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
dc.subject
ECONOMIC GROWTH
dc.subject
PEOPLE
dc.subject
VACCINATION
dc.subject
POLICY ENVIRONMENT
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
dc.subject
CARBON DIOXIDE
dc.subject
FOREST MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
CARBON
dc.subject
PREVENTION
dc.subject
LAWS
dc.subject
EXPECTATIONS
dc.subject
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION
dc.subject
SOCIAL RESEARCH
dc.subject
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
dc.subject
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
dc.subject
LABOR FORCE
dc.subject
EMISSIONS
dc.subject
HEALTH CARE
dc.subject
REVENUES
dc.subject
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
dc.subject
SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
INCENTIVES
dc.subject
HEALTH
dc.subject
CRIME
dc.subject
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT
dc.subject
CONDITIONALITY
dc.subject
PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.subject
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
dc.subject
AUDITS
dc.subject
LIFE EXPECTANCY
dc.subject
RESOURCE USE
dc.subject
KNOWLEDGE
dc.subject
PRESENT VALUE
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
dc.subject
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
IRON
dc.subject
CROWDING OUT
dc.subject
OIL
dc.subject
IMMUNIZATION
dc.subject
PATIENT
dc.subject
PATIENTS
dc.subject
INTERVENTION
dc.subject
POPULATION GROWTH
dc.subject
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
dc.subject
CAPITAL FORMATION
dc.subject
OPTIONS
dc.subject
NURSES
dc.subject
QUOTAS
dc.subject
OBSERVATION
dc.subject
VIOLENCE
dc.subject
DEBT
dc.subject
MARKETING
dc.subject
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
dc.subject
FORESTRY
dc.subject
ECONOMIC POLICIES
dc.subject
NATURAL RESOURCES
dc.subject
MENTAL HEALTH
dc.subject
MORTALITY
dc.subject
SUBSIDIES
dc.subject
SOCIAL SUPPORT
dc.subject
EFFICIENCY
dc.subject
FISHING
dc.subject
TAX REFORMS
dc.subject
LAND USE
dc.subject
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
dc.subject
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
dc.subject
RESOURCES
dc.subject
UNEMPLOYMENT
dc.subject
EQUITY
dc.subject
POTENTIAL INVESTORS
dc.subject
ECONOMIC IMPACT
dc.subject
DIPHTHERIA
dc.subject
RURAL COMMUNITIES
dc.subject
RESEARCH CENTERS
dc.subject
WORKERS
dc.subject
AGED
dc.subject
SOCIAL SERVICES
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
VALUES
dc.subject
IMMUNODEFICIENCY
dc.subject
HEALTH POLICY
dc.subject
CREDIT
dc.subject
PURCHASING POWER
dc.subject
DIVISION OF LABOR
dc.subject
DEFORESTATION
dc.subject
CPI
dc.subject
DEMAND
dc.subject
HEALTH OUTCOMES
dc.subject
SUSTAINABLE USE
dc.subject
HYGIENE
dc.subject
NATIONAL INCOME
dc.subject
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
dc.subject
FAMILY PLANNING
dc.subject
EXPENDITURES
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENTS
dc.subject
PROPERTY
dc.subject
TAX RATES
dc.subject
CHILD NUTRITION
dc.subject
MEASUREMENT
dc.subject
REFUGEES
dc.subject
NUTRITION
dc.subject
TRANSACTION COSTS
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENT
dc.subject
SOIL DEGRADATION
dc.subject
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
WORKSHOPS
dc.subject
WEATHER PATTERNS
dc.subject
ECONOMICS
dc.subject
TERMS OF TRADE
dc.subject
QUALITY OF LIFE
dc.subject
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
dc.subject
TAX REVENUE
dc.subject
INTERNET
dc.subject
FISHERIES
dc.subject
WEIGHT
dc.subject
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
TRADE
dc.subject
LAND
dc.subject
CHILDREN
dc.subject
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
dc.subject
COMMERCIAL BANKS
dc.subject
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
dc.subject
FARMS
dc.subject
POPULATION PRESSURES
dc.subject
REVENUE
dc.subject
INSTITUTIONALIZATION
dc.subject
STRATEGY
dc.subject
REGISTRATION
dc.subject
MEDICINES
dc.subject
ENVIRONMENTAL
dc.subject
HOSPITALS
dc.subject
LABOR MARKETS
dc.subject
INTERMEDIARIES
dc.subject
WETLANDS
dc.subject
HEALTH SERVICES
dc.subject
IMPLEMENTATION
dc.subject
CONDOMS
dc.subject
PRICES
dc.subject
ECONOMIES
dc.subject
COMPETITION
dc.title
Uganda Country Assistance Evaluation, 2001-2007
en
dc.title.subtitle
Joint IEG/OPEV Country Assistance Evaluation
en
dc.type
Book
en
okr.date.disclosure
2015-10-07
okr.doctype
Publications & Research
okr.doctype
Publications & Research :: Publication
okr.docurl
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/10/25126425/uganda-country-assistance-evaluation-2001-2007
okr.globalpractice
Governance
okr.googlescholar.linkpresent
yes
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum
090224b08312a954_1_0
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum
25126425
okr.identifier.report
100005
okr.language.supported
en
okr.pdfurl
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/10/07/090224b08312a954/1_0/Rendered/PDF/Uganda000Count0valuation00200102007.pdf
en
okr.region.administrative
Africa
okr.region.country
Uganda
okr.topic
Public Sector Development
okr.topic
Finance and Financial Sector Development :: Access to Finance
okr.topic
Environment :: Environmental Economics & Policies
okr.topic
Finance and Financial Sector Development :: Banks & Banking Reform
okr.topic
Health, Nutrition and Population :: Health Monitoring & Evaluation
okr.unit
IEG HD and Econ Mgmt Department (IEGHE)

Show simple item record



This item appears in the following Collection(s)