Romania Judicial Functional Review

Show simple item record

collection.link.90
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2198
collection.name.90
Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment
dc.contributor.author
World Bank
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-18T21:25:18Z
dc.date.available
2014-12-18T21:25:18Z
dc.date.issued
2013-03
dc.date.lastModified
2021-04-23T14:03:59Z
dc.description.abstract
This review is one of a series of functional reviews commissioned by the Government of Romania (GOR), funded by the European Union, and carried out by the World Bank. It is an element agreed on by the European Union and the Government as part of the post-accession Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) established to assess further need for reform in the judicial system and to suggest reforms that would ensure Romania's full integration into the European Union system. The objective of the review is to analyze the functioning of institutions of the judicial system in Romania with a view to providing analytical and advisory input to the Romanian authorities as they formulate an action program to improve the performance of the judicial system. The present report covers a large part of Romania's judicial system, a term used here with broad scope. In accord with the terms of reference (appendix one), in addition to the courts, the review covers the Ministry of Justice, focusing on those functions most directly related to the judiciary and to the Public Ministry (PM), the PM itself, and a range of independent legal professionals whose work complements and in some cases replaces that of judges and prosecutors. Within the judiciary, aside from the ordinary courts, the review also addressed the operations of the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Judicial Inspectorate, and the High Court of Cassation and Justice, all of which operate quasi-independently. They have their own budgets and administrative structures, although are still governed by laws on staffing set by Parliament and staffing levels approved by the cabinet. Within the PM, the team also looked at the quasi-independent National Anti-Corruption Directorate.
en
dc.identifier
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20808
dc.language
English
dc.language.iso
en_US
dc.publisher
Washington, DC
dc.rights
CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subject
ABUSE
dc.subject
ABUSES
dc.subject
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
dc.subject
ACCESSION
dc.subject
ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject
ACRONYMS
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
dc.subject
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
dc.subject
ANNUAL REPORTS
dc.subject
ANTI-CORRUPTION
dc.subject
ANTICORRUPTION
dc.subject
APPELLATE COURTS
dc.subject
ARBITRATION
dc.subject
ARRANGEMENTS
dc.subject
ATTORNEYS
dc.subject
BAILIFFS
dc.subject
BAR ASSOCIATIONS
dc.subject
BENCHMARKS
dc.subject
BRIBE
dc.subject
BRIBES
dc.subject
BUSINESS PROCESS
dc.subject
CAPABILITIES
dc.subject
CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
dc.subject
CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE
dc.subject
CLASSIFICATION
dc.subject
COLLAPSE
dc.subject
COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
dc.subject
COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
dc.subject
COMPENSATION
dc.subject
COMPLAINT
dc.subject
COMPLAINTS
dc.subject
CONFIDENCE
dc.subject
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
dc.subject
CONTENTS
dc.subject
CONVICTIONS
dc.subject
CORRUPT
dc.subject
COURT
dc.subject
COURT PROCEEDINGS
dc.subject
COURT RECORDS
dc.subject
COURTS
dc.subject
CRIME
dc.subject
CRIMES
dc.subject
CRIMINAL
dc.subject
CRIMINAL CASES
dc.subject
CRIMINAL PROCEDURES
dc.subject
DATA WAREHOUSE
dc.subject
DETENTION
dc.subject
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
dc.subject
DISTRICT COURTS
dc.subject
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
DOCUMENTS
dc.subject
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
dc.subject
ELECTRONIC FILING
dc.subject
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
dc.subject
ENTRIES
dc.subject
ENTRY
dc.subject
EU
dc.subject
FAIR TRIAL
dc.subject
FILINGS
dc.subject
FINANCIAL RESOURCE
dc.subject
FINANCIAL RESOURCES
dc.subject
GENERAL PUBLIC
dc.subject
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
dc.subject
HARDWARE
dc.subject
HUMAN RESOURCE
dc.subject
HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY
dc.subject
HUMAN RESOURCES
dc.subject
HUMAN RIGHTS
dc.subject
ICT
dc.subject
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
dc.subject
INFORMATION INTEGRATION
dc.subject
INFORMATION SERVICES
dc.subject
INFORMATION SYSTEM
dc.subject
INITIATIVE
dc.subject
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
dc.subject
INTEROPERABILITY
dc.subject
INVENTORY
dc.subject
INVESTIGATION
dc.subject
INVESTIGATIONS
dc.subject
JUDGE
dc.subject
JUDGES
dc.subject
JUDGMENTS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
dc.subject
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
dc.subject
JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS
dc.subject
JUDICIAL REFORM
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SERVICE
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SERVICES
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
dc.subject
JUDICIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
dc.subject
JUDICIARY
dc.subject
JURISDICTION
dc.subject
JUSTICE
dc.subject
LAWS
dc.subject
LAWYER
dc.subject
LAWYERS
dc.subject
LEGAL AID
dc.subject
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subject
LEGAL CHANGES
dc.subject
LEGAL COUNSEL
dc.subject
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
LEGAL INTERPRETATION
dc.subject
LEGAL PROFESSIONALS
dc.subject
LEGAL REFORM
dc.subject
LEGAL SERVICES
dc.subject
LEGAL SYSTEM
dc.subject
LEGALITY
dc.subject
LEGISLATION
dc.subject
LITIGATION
dc.subject
LOGIC
dc.subject
MAGISTRATES
dc.subject
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
dc.subject
MEDIATION
dc.subject
MILITARY COURTS
dc.subject
MINISTER
dc.subject
MINISTERS
dc.subject
NATIONAL INTEGRITY
dc.subject
NOTARIES
dc.subject
ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS
dc.subject
PENSION
dc.subject
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
dc.subject
PRISONS
dc.subject
PRIVATE SECTOR
dc.subject
PRODUCTIVITY
dc.subject
PROSECUTION
dc.subject
PROSECUTOR
dc.subject
PROSECUTORS
dc.subject
PROTOCOLS
dc.subject
REGISTRY
dc.subject
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
dc.subject
REMEDIES
dc.subject
RESULT
dc.subject
RESULTS
dc.subject
SANCTIONS
dc.subject
SEARCH
dc.subject
SECURITY POLICY
dc.subject
SENTENCES
dc.subject
SERVICE DELIVERY
dc.subject
SOCIAL SECURITY
dc.subject
STATE COURTS
dc.subject
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
TARGETS
dc.subject
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
dc.subject
TERRORISM
dc.subject
TIME FRAME
dc.subject
TIME PERIOD
dc.subject
TRANSPARENCY
dc.subject
TRIALS
dc.subject
TRIBUNALS
dc.subject
USER
dc.subject
USER GROUPS
dc.subject
USER TRAINING
dc.subject
USERS
dc.subject
VERIFICATION
dc.subject
VICTIMS
dc.subject
WILL
dc.subject
WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
dc.title
Romania Judicial Functional Review
en
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea
Gender
okr.date.disclosure
2014-10-28
okr.doctype
Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment
okr.docurl
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review
okr.globalpractice
Governance
okr.globalpractice
Transport and ICT
okr.googlescholar.linkpresent
yes
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum
000470435_20141028073910
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum
20329626
okr.identifier.report
79697
okr.language.supported
en
okr.pdfurl
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/10/28/000470435_20141028073910/Rendered/PDF/796970WP0REVIS0Functional0Review0EN.pdf
en
okr.region.administrative
Europe and Central Asia
okr.region.country
Romania
okr.sector
Public Administration, Law, and Justice :: Central government administration
okr.theme
Rule of law :: Law reform
okr.topic
Law and Development :: Judicial System Reform
okr.topic
Information Security and Privacy
okr.topic
Gender :: Gender and Law
okr.topic
Private Sector Development :: E-Business
okr.topic
Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures
okr.topic
Public Sector Development
okr.topic
Information and Communication Technologies

Show simple item record



This item appears in the following Collection(s)