Turkey : Country Procurement Assessment Report

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación

collection.link.57
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2165
collection.name.57
Country Procurement Assessment
dc.contributor.author
World Bank
dc.date.accessioned
2013-07-01T19:57:55Z
dc.date.available
2013-07-01T19:57:55Z
dc.date.issued
2001-06
dc.date.lastModified
2021-04-23T14:03:15Z
dc.description.abstract
Public procurement legislation in Turkey has not kept pace with the sweeping reforms undertaken in the national procurement systems of many other countries during the same period nor with the development of internationally recognized bodies of procurement legislation, such as those of United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the European Union (EU) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). Following Turkey's acceptance, in December 1999, as a candidate country for accession to the EU, the Government has committed itself to achieving approximation and, eventually, alignment with EU law in many areas, including public procurement. To that end, the MOF and MPWS have already begun the process of drafting a new public procurement law, a draft of which has already been promulgated within Government and on which both the World Bank and the European Commission have offered their comments. Clearly, it is essential that this new draft law should not only make up the ground lost in the 17 years since the GPL was last amended but also bring the Turkish law up to date with recognized models of best practice and achieve an appropriate degree of approximation with the EU Directives. However, it is unlikely that approximation, let alone full alignment, can be achieved with a single reform of the law. Rather, it is recommended that the Government should aim to develop a new public procurement law which meets the standards of transparency, accountability and competitiveness set by the UNCITRAL Model Law but which also balances the need to prepare a path towards increasing harmonization with the EU Procurement Directives. This report also recommends that: 1) The Government should make it a top priority to draft a new national public procurement law and submit it to the Turkish Grand National Assembly by October 2001. This new law should meet the standards of transparency, accountability and competitiveness enshrined in the UNCITRAL Model Law. The new draft law should be developed with appropriate input from Turkey's key development partners, primarily the World Bank and the European Union, and should be discussed and agreed with them. The new law should also be underpinned by detailed implementing regulations, to be developed and issued shortly after the enactment of the new law. 2) The scope of the law should cover all public procurement for which budgetary resources (such as the general and annexed budgets) and extra-budgetary resources are used, including the non-commercialized stat economic enterprises. 3) In drafting and enacting the new public procurement law, the Government should ensure an adequate level of consultation with both the public and private sectors. To achieve this, an inter-ministerial Drafting Committee should be entrusted with responsibility for drafting the new public procurement law and should be supported by specialist international procurement law experts. 4) To complement these measures, the Government should put in train a planned and progressive program of legislative reform in order to move Turkey's public procurement legislation, over the medium term, to alignment with the EU Procurement Directives by the time Turkey accedes to the European Union.
en
dc.identifier
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/3348322/turkey-country-procurement-assessment-report
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14326
dc.language
English
dc.language.iso
en_US
dc.publisher
Washington, DC
dc.rights
CC BY 3.0 IGO
dc.rights.holder
World Bank
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
dc.subject
ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
dc.subject
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
dc.subject
ANTI-CORRUPTION
dc.subject
ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY
dc.subject
AUTHORIZATION
dc.subject
BANKING LAW
dc.subject
BRIBERY
dc.subject
BUDGET LAW
dc.subject
BUDGETARY ALLOCATION
dc.subject
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
dc.subject
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
dc.subject
CIVIL LAW
dc.subject
CIVIL SERVANTS
dc.subject
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
dc.subject
CONSTITUTION
dc.subject
COUNCIL OF MINISTERS
dc.subject
CRIMINAL LAW
dc.subject
CUSTOMS
dc.subject
DECENTRALIZATION
dc.subject
DECREE
dc.subject
DECREES
dc.subject
DISCRETION
dc.subject
ENACTMENT
dc.subject
EXECUTION
dc.subject
FISCAL
dc.subject
FISCAL CONTROL
dc.subject
FRAUD
dc.subject
GOVERNMENT LEVEL
dc.subject
INFORMAL PROCEDURES
dc.subject
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
dc.subject
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW
dc.subject
LAWS
dc.subject
LEGISLATION
dc.subject
LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subject
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
LEGISLATIVE POWER
dc.subject
LEGISLATIVE REFORM
dc.subject
LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS
dc.subject
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
dc.subject
NATIONS
dc.subject
PRIORITIES
dc.subject
PROCUREMENT LAWS
dc.subject
PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS
dc.subject
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
dc.subject
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
dc.subject
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
dc.subject
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
dc.subject
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM
dc.subject
PUBLIC SECTOR
dc.subject
PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT
dc.subject
PUBLIC SPENDING
dc.subject
PUBLIC WORKS
dc.subject
RAILWAYS
dc.subject
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
REPRESENTATIVES
dc.subject
SANCTIONS
dc.subject
SOLICITATION
dc.subject
STATE PLANNING
dc.subject
TRANSPARENCY PROCUREMENT LAWS
dc.subject
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
dc.subject
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
dc.subject
PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES
dc.subject
PROCUREMENT PRACTICES
dc.subject
CORRUPTION
dc.subject
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
dc.subject
RISK ASSESSMENT
dc.subject
COMMERCIAL LAW
dc.subject
BIDDING PROCEDURES
dc.subject
STANDARD BIDDING DOCUMENTS
dc.subject
PREQUALIFICATION
dc.subject
BID SECURITY
dc.subject
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT LAW
dc.subject
LEGISLATIVE REFORM
dc.subject
LIMITED INTERNATIONAL BIDDING
dc.subject
UNCITRAL
dc.subject
PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES
dc.subject
POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY
dc.title
Turkey : Country Procurement Assessment Report
en
okr.date.disclosure
2010-06-12
okr.doctype
Economic & Sector Work :: Country Procurement Assessment (CPAR)
okr.doctype
Economic & Sector Work
okr.docurl
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/06/3348322/turkey-country-procurement-assessment-report
okr.globalpractice
Governance
okr.googlescholar.linkpresent
yes
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum
000160016_20040505172520
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum
3348322
okr.identifier.report
28845
okr.language.supported
en
okr.pdfurl
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/05/05/000160016_20040505172520/Rendered/PDF/288451Turkey0CPAR.pdf
en
okr.region.administrative
Europe and Central Asia
okr.region.country
Turkey
okr.topic
Legal Institutions of the Market Economy
okr.topic
Governance :: National Governance
okr.topic
Law and Development :: Judicial System Reform
okr.topic
Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures
okr.topic
Public Sector Development
okr.unit
Operations Policy and Services (ECSPS)
okr.volume
1 of 1

Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación



Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)