How Effective Have Poverty and Social Impact Analyses Been?
Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación
| collection.link.180 |
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9411
| |
| collection.name.180 |
IEG Fast Track Brief
| |
| dc.contributor.author |
World Bank
| |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2012-08-13T11:58:21Z
| |
| dc.date.available |
2012-08-13T11:58:21Z
| |
| dc.date.issued |
2009-06
| |
| dc.date.lastModified |
2021-04-23T14:02:51Z
| |
| dc.description.abstract |
The Poverty and Social Impact Analysis
(PSIA) approach, introduced by the World Bank in FY02, aimed
to help the Bank and its client countries anticipate and
address the possible consequences of proposed policy
reforms, especially on the poor and vulnerable, and to
contribute to country capacity for policy analysis.
According to the Bank, by FY07 it had undertaken 156 PSIAs
in 75 countries and 14 sectors. Total Bank and other donor
support to PSIAs over FY04-06 was $15 million. Development
literature has emphasized the importance of understanding
the institutional and political constraints to development,
building domestic ownership of policy reforms, and assessing
the distributional impacts of policy actions. The PSIA
approach has correctly emphasized these aspects. The Bank
has produced a substantial body of guidance on how to
address these aspects, and that guidance has been refined
over time to incorporate lessons learned. Development
literature has emphasized the importance of understanding
the institutional and political constraints to development,
building domestic ownership of policy reforms, and assessing
the distributional impacts of policy actions. The PSIA
approach has correctly emphasized these aspects. The Bank
has produced a substantial body of guidance on how to
address these aspects, and that guidance has been refined
over time to incorporate lessons learned.
| en |
| dc.identifier |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2009/06/12815324/effective-poverty-social-impact-analyses
| |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10539
| |
| dc.language |
English
| |
| dc.publisher |
Washington, DC
| |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
IEG Fast Track Brief
| |
| dc.rights |
CC BY 3.0 IGO
| |
| dc.rights.holder |
World Bank
| |
| dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/
| |
| dc.subject |
ADJUSTMENT PROGRAMS
| |
| dc.subject |
ANALYTICAL WORK
| |
| dc.subject |
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
| |
| dc.subject |
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
| |
| dc.subject |
BENEFICIARIES
| |
| dc.subject |
CAPACITY BUILDING
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY ASSISTANCE
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY CAPACITY
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY POLICIES
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY PROGRAM
| |
| dc.subject |
COUNTRY STAKEHOLDERS
| |
| dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
| |
| dc.subject |
DEVELOPMENT POLICY OPERATIONS
| |
| dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT
| |
| dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF POLICY REFORMS
| |
| dc.subject |
DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS
| |
| dc.subject |
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
| |
| dc.subject |
FLEXIBILITY
| |
| dc.subject |
IMPACT OF ADJUSTMENT
| |
| dc.subject |
IMPACT OF POLICY
| |
| dc.subject |
IMPACTS OF POLICY
| |
| dc.subject |
INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
INVESTMENT LOANS
| |
| dc.subject |
LEARNING
| |
| dc.subject |
MIXED METHODS
| |
| dc.subject |
OPERATIONAL POLICY
| |
| dc.subject |
PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY ACTIONS
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY CHOICES
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY DEBATE
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY DECISIONS
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY DESIGN
| |
| dc.subject |
POLICY REFORMS
| |
| dc.subject |
POLITICAL ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION
| |
| dc.subject |
POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES
| |
| dc.subject |
QUALITATIVE TECHNIQUES
| |
| dc.subject |
REFORM PROGRAMS
| |
| dc.subject |
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE
| |
| dc.subject |
SECTOR WORK
| |
| dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACT
| |
| dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
| |
| dc.subject |
SOCIAL IMPACTS
| |
| dc.subject |
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT
| |
| dc.subject |
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
| |
| dc.subject |
TECHNICAL QUALITY
| |
| dc.title |
How Effective Have Poverty and Social Impact Analyses Been?
| en |
| okr.date.disclosure |
2010-09-29
| |
| okr.doctype |
Publications & Research :: Brief
| |
| okr.doctype |
Publications & Research
| |
| okr.docurl |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2009/06/12815324/effective-poverty-social-impact-analyses
| |
| okr.globalpractice |
Poverty
| |
| okr.globalpractice |
Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience
| |
| okr.globalpractice |
Poverty
| |
| okr.globalpractice |
Finance and Markets
| |
| okr.globalpractice |
Governance
| |
| okr.googlescholar.linkpresent |
yes
| |
| okr.identifier.externaldocumentum |
000334955_20100929033440
| |
| okr.identifier.internaldocumentum |
12815324
| |
| okr.identifier.report |
56817
| |
| okr.language.supported |
en
| |
| okr.pdfurl |
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/09/29/000334955_20100929033440/Rendered/PDF/568170BRI0Box31esk1to1desk106104110.pdf
| en |
| okr.topic |
Social Development :: Poverty and Social Impact Analysis
| |
| okr.topic |
Country Strategy and Performance
| |
| okr.topic |
Banks and Banking Reform
| |
| okr.topic |
Public Sector Corruption and Anticorruption Measures
| |
| okr.topic |
Poverty Monitoring and Analysis
| |
| okr.topic |
Finance and Financial Sector Development
| |
| okr.topic |
Poverty Reduction
| |
| okr.topic |
Public Sector Development
| |
| okr.unit |
Independent Evaluation Grp-IFC (CEXEG)
| |
| okr.volume |
1 of 1
|
Mostrar el registro sencillo de la publicación







Siga a Publicaciones del Banco Mundial en Facebook, Twitter o LinkedIn