Publication:
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files in English
English PDF (382.43 KB)
216 downloads
Date
2017-10-24
ISSN
1943-9342
Published
2017-10-24
Author(s)
Puri, Jyotsna
Aladysheva, Anastasia
Iversen, Vegard
Bruck, Tilman
Abstract
Each year billions of US-dollars of humanitarian assistance are mobilised in response to man-made emergencies and natural disasters. Yet, rigorous evidence for how best to intervene remains scant. This dearth reflects that rigorous impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance pose major methodological, practical and ethical challenges. While theory-based impact evaluations can crucially inform humanitarian programming, popular methods, such as orthodox RCTs, are less suitable. Instead, factorial designs and quasi-experimental designs can be ethical and robust, answering questions about how to improve the delivery of assistance. We argue that it helps to be prepared, planning impact evaluations before the onset of emergencies.
Link to Data Set
Report Series
Other publications in this report series
Journal
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Associated URLs
Citations