Publication: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in the Power Sector : Case Studies from India
dc.contributor.author | World Bank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-30T19:00:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-30T19:00:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | The study extends the previous work from the "India : Environmental Issues in the Power Sector" report, by applying a global overlay, that is, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts, and GHG mitigation analysis, as well as estimating the incremental costs of GHG reduction, for the two case studies, Andhra Pradesh (AP) and Bihar. The study analyzes economic, financial, and technical issues, though not necessarily environmental impacts, to then "overlay" these analyses, with a systematic process for assessing the implications of GHG business-as-usual (BAU), and reform, so as to design a new scenario, i.e., the GHG mitigation scenario. Following a revision of its scope, and methodology, the study focuses on load forecasts, based on the two case studies' projected unconstrained energy, and power demand over a twenty year planning for the BAU, and reform scenarios, broken down by consumer category: domestic, commercial, low tension/high tension industry, and agriculture. Both case studies relied heavily on a least-cost power system expansion planning software (A/SPLAN), which employs a dynamic programming algorithm. Conclusions suggest that BAU implications cannot be applied as a meaningful baseline scenario for GHG mitigation analysis in these two case studies. While emissions are lower under BAU, than under reform, the expected energy served is also substantially less: massive expected failures in electricity supply under BAU conditions would not be acceptable, thus the reform scenario was selected as a baseline reference point for GHG reduction analysis. | en |
dc.identifier | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/02/1346343/greenhouse-gas-mitigation-power-sector-case-studies-india | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10986/20302 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Washington, DC | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP);no. ESM 237 / 01 | |
dc.rights | CC BY 3.0 IGO | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ | |
dc.subject | ALTERNATIVE USES | |
dc.subject | ASH | |
dc.subject | ATMOSPHERIC EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | BED COMBUSTION | |
dc.subject | BIOMASS | |
dc.subject | CALORIFIC VALUE | |
dc.subject | CARBON | |
dc.subject | CARBON DIOXIDE | |
dc.subject | CARBON EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | CARBON TRADING | |
dc.subject | CH4 | |
dc.subject | CLIMATE | |
dc.subject | CLIMATE CHANGE | |
dc.subject | CO2 | |
dc.subject | COAL | |
dc.subject | COAL | |
dc.subject | COAL BURNING | |
dc.subject | COAL MINING | |
dc.subject | COAL PLANT | |
dc.subject | COAL TECHNOLOGIES | |
dc.subject | COAL WASHING | |
dc.subject | COGENERATION | |
dc.subject | COLORS | |
dc.subject | COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMPS | |
dc.subject | CYCLE GAS | |
dc.subject | CYCLE GAS PLANTS | |
dc.subject | DECISION MAKING | |
dc.subject | DOMESTIC COAL | |
dc.subject | ECONOMISTS | |
dc.subject | ELASTICITIES | |
dc.subject | ELECTRIC POWER | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICITY | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICITY DEMAND | |
dc.subject | ELECTRICITY PRICES | |
dc.subject | EMISSION | |
dc.subject | EMISSION REDUCTION | |
dc.subject | EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | EMISSIONS FACTORS | |
dc.subject | ENERGY CONSERVATION | |
dc.subject | ENERGY DEVELOPMENT | |
dc.subject | ENERGY EFFICIENCY | |
dc.subject | ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES | |
dc.subject | ENERGY MANAGEMENT | |
dc.subject | ENERGY PRACTICES | |
dc.subject | ENERGY PRICING | |
dc.subject | ENERGY SAVINGS | |
dc.subject | ENERGY SECTOR | |
dc.subject | ENTITLEMENTS | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES | |
dc.subject | ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS | |
dc.subject | EXCHANGE RATE | |
dc.subject | FUEL | |
dc.subject | FUEL OIL | |
dc.subject | GAS | |
dc.subject | GAS | |
dc.subject | GAS PLANTS | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY | |
dc.subject | GLOBAL WARMING | |
dc.subject | GREENHOUSE | |
dc.subject | GREENHOUSE GAS | |
dc.subject | GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION | |
dc.subject | GRID | |
dc.subject | GRID SUPPLY | |
dc.subject | HEAVY INDUSTRY | |
dc.subject | HYDRO POWER | |
dc.subject | IMPORTS | |
dc.subject | INCOME | |
dc.subject | INFLATION | |
dc.subject | JOINT IMPLEMENTATION | |
dc.subject | LIQUID FUELS | |
dc.subject | LIVING CONDITIONS | |
dc.subject | LNG | |
dc.subject | METHANE | |
dc.subject | METHANE EMISSIONS | |
dc.subject | MINI- HYDRO | |
dc.subject | MINI-HYDRO | |
dc.subject | NITROGEN | |
dc.subject | NITROUS OXIDE | |
dc.subject | NUCLEAR PLANTS | |
dc.subject | NUCLEAR POWER | |
dc.subject | OXIDES | |
dc.subject | PARTICULATE MATTER | |
dc.subject | PETROLEUM PRODUCTS | |
dc.subject | PHOTOVOLTAICS | |
dc.subject | POLLUTION | |
dc.subject | POVERTY ALLEVIATION | |
dc.subject | POWER DISTRIBUTION | |
dc.subject | POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | POWER GENERATION | |
dc.subject | POWER PLANTS | |
dc.subject | POWER SECTOR REFORM | |
dc.subject | POWER STATIONS | |
dc.subject | POWER SUPPLIES | |
dc.subject | POWER SYSTEM | |
dc.subject | POWER SYSTEMS | |
dc.subject | PRESENT VALUE | |
dc.subject | PRICE ELASTICITIES | |
dc.subject | PRICE ELASTICITY | |
dc.subject | RENEWABLE ENERGY | |
dc.subject | SO2 | |
dc.subject | SODIUM | |
dc.subject | SOLAR ENERGY | |
dc.subject | SUGAR INDUSTRY | |
dc.subject | SULPHUR | |
dc.subject | SUPPLY CURVES | |
dc.subject | SUSTAINABLE ENERGY | |
dc.subject | THERMAL POWER | |
dc.subject | TOTAL EMISSIONS | |
dc.title | Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in the Power Sector : Case Studies from India | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
okr.crosscuttingsolutionarea | Climate Change | |
okr.date.disclosure | 2001-02-28 | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research::ESMAP Paper | |
okr.doctype | Publications & Research | |
okr.docurl | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/02/1346343/greenhouse-gas-mitigation-power-sector-case-studies-india | |
okr.globalpractice | Environment and Natural Resources | |
okr.globalpractice | Energy and Extractives | |
okr.guid | 206961468752375527 | |
okr.identifier.externaldocumentum | 000094946_0106150505146 | |
okr.identifier.internaldocumentum | 1346343 | |
okr.identifier.report | ESM237 | |
okr.language.supported | en | |
okr.pdfurl | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/06/29/000094946_0106150505146/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf | en |
okr.region.administrative | South Asia | |
okr.region.country | India | |
okr.sector | Energy and mining :: Power | |
okr.sector | Energy and mining :: General energy sector | |
okr.theme | Environment and natural resources management :: Climate change | |
okr.topic | Power and Energy Conversion | |
okr.topic | Energy::Energy and Environment | |
okr.topic | Environment::Carbon Policy and Trading | |
okr.topic | Environmental Economics and Policies | |
okr.topic | Environment::Montreal Protocol | |
okr.unit | Information Management | |
okr.volume | 1 |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1